NCT07842198

Brief Summary

The purpose of the CARMic study is to investigate whether a restrictive, microbiome-sparing antibiotic strategy can better preserve the gut microbiota in patients undergoing chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy without compromising infectious safety. This is a randomized, open-label Phase II trial enrolling 150 adults with large B-cell lymphoma or multiple myeloma who are scheduled to receive standard-of-care CAR-T therapy. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either a restrictive antibiotic strategy based on ceftazidime and/or ciprofloxacin or an unrestricted standard-of-care antibiotic strategy. The assigned strategy will apply from randomization until 28 days after CAR-T-cell infusion. Antibiotic treatment may be modified or broadened at any time when clinically indicated. The primary question is whether the restrictive antibiotic strategy results in greater gut microbial diversity 28 days after CAR-T-cell infusion compared with standard-of-care antibiotic treatment. Gut microbial diversity will be assessed in stool samples using the Shannon diversity index. The study will also compare infections, antibiotic exposure, adherence to the assigned strategy, CAR-T-related toxicities, treatment response, relapse, progression-free survival, and overall survival between the two groups. Changes in gut microbiota composition and in blood and stool metabolomic and proteomic profiles will be evaluated over time. Blood and stool samples will be collected at randomization, around the time of CAR-T-cell infusion, 28 days after infusion, and at the end-of-treatment evaluation approximately 3-6 months after infusion.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
150

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
59mo left

Started Mar 2027

Longer than P75 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 20, 2026

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 25, 2026

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2027

Expected
2.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2029

2 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2031

Last Updated

September 25, 2026

Status Verified

September 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

September 20, 2026

Last Update Submit

September 20, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

CAR-T-cell therapyAntibiotic strategyMicrobiome-sparing antibioticsCeftazidimeCiprofloxacinGut microbiomeFebrile neutropeniaShannon diversity indexMetabolomics

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Gut Microbiota Alpha Diversity at Day 28

    Gut microbiota alpha diversity measured by the Shannon diversity index in a stool sample collected at day 28 after CAR-T-cell infusion. The Shannon index quantifies within-sample microbial diversity by incorporating both microbial richness and evenness. The treatment effect will be expressed as the adjusted mean difference in the Shannon diversity index between the restrictive antibiotic strategy and the standard-of-care antibiotic strategy, calculated as restrictive strategy minus standard of care. A positive difference favors the restrictive strategy.

    Day 28 after CAR-T-cell infusion (±3 working days)

Secondary Outcomes (18)

  • Longitudinal Gut Microbiota Alpha Diversity

    From randomization through the end-of-treatment evaluation, approximately 3-6 months after CAR-T-cell infusion

  • Gut Microbiota Beta Diversity

    From randomization through the end-of-treatment evaluation, approximately 3-6 months after CAR-T-cell infusion

  • Relative Abundance of Predefined Beneficial Bacterial Taxa

    From randomization through the end-of-treatment evaluation, approximately 3-6 months after CAR-T-cell infusion

  • Infectious Complications

    Randomization to CAR-T-cell infusion; day 0-28; and day 29-90 after infusion

  • Total Systemic Antibacterial Exposure

    From randomization through day 28 after CAR-T-cell infusion

  • +13 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Restrictive Antibiotic Strategy

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will follow a protocol-defined restrictive antibacterial strategy from randomization until day 28 after CAR-T-cell infusion. Intravenous ceftazidime will be used as initial empirical antibacterial treatment when clinically indicated. Oral ciprofloxacin may be used as step-down therapy following adequate infection control and clinical stabilization or as antibacterial prophylaxis when clinically indicated in the absence of suspected ongoing infection. Antibacterial treatment may be modified or broadened at any time when clinically required.

Drug: ceftazidimeDrug: ciprofloxacin

Standard-of-Care Antibiotic Strategy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants will receive antibacterial prophylaxis and treatment according to unrestricted local standard-of-care practice from randomization until day 28 after CAR-T-cell infusion. Selection, modification, escalation, and duration of antibacterial treatment will be determined by the treating physician according to clinical findings, microbiological results, and local guidelines.

Other: Standard-of-Care Antibiotic Strategy

Interventions

Intravenous ceftazidime will be used as initial empirical antibacterial treatment when clinically indicated during the period from randomization through day 28 after CAR-T-cell infusion. Dosing and renal dose adjustment will follow the applicable product information and local clinical practice. Treatment may be modified or broadened at any time when clinically required.

Restrictive Antibiotic Strategy

Oral ciprofloxacin may be used as protocol-defined step-down therapy after adequate infection control and clinical stabilization or as antibacterial prophylaxis when clinically indicated in the absence of suspected ongoing infection. Ciprofloxacin will not be used as initial empirical monotherapy for suspected infection. Dosing and renal dose adjustment will follow the applicable product information and local clinical practice.

Restrictive Antibiotic Strategy

Participants will receive antibacterial prophylaxis and treatment according to unrestricted local standard-of-care practice. Selection, dosing, modification, escalation, and duration of antibacterial treatment will be determined by the treating physician according to clinical findings, microbiological results, and local guidelines.

Standard-of-Care Antibiotic Strategy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18 years or older. Relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma according to the current World Health Organization classification, or relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma according to the current International Myeloma Working Group classification.
  • Eligible for treatment with a CAR-T-cell product authorized in the European Union and recommended for reimbursement by the Danish Medicines Council.
  • A clinical decision to proceed with CAR-T-cell therapy has been made jointly by the participant and the treating physician.
  • Written informed consent to participate in the trial.

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding. Psychiatric illness or other condition that may interfere with the ability to understand or comply with the trial requirements.
  • Clinical signs of an uncontrolled serious infection. Severe colitis. Previous allergic reaction to cephalosporins or ciprofloxacin. Participants with a known allergy to other beta-lactam antibiotics, including penicillins, may be enrolled provided that they do not have a known allergy to cephalosporins.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Zealand University Hospital

Roskilde, Vælg Venligst Region, 4000, Denmark

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Multiple MyelomaFebrile Neutropenia

Interventions

CeftazidimeCiprofloxacin

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms, Plasma CellNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsHemostatic DisordersVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesParaproteinemiasBlood Protein DisordersHematologic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic DiseasesHemorrhagic DisordersLymphoproliferative DisordersImmunoproliferative DisordersImmune System DiseasesNeutropeniaAgranulocytosisLeukopeniaCytopeniaLeukocyte Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

CephaloridineCephalosporinsbeta-LactamsLactamsAmidesOrganic ChemicalsThiazinesSulfur CompoundsHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsFluoroquinolones4-QuinolonesQuinolonesQuinolines

Central Study Contacts

Lars M Pedersen, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants are randomized 1:1 to two parallel treatment groups and stratified by disease cohort: large B-cell lymphoma or multiple myeloma.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 20, 2026

First Posted

September 25, 2026

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2031

Last Updated

September 25, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual participant data will not be made publicly available. The study includes sensitive clinical, microbiome, metabolomic, and proteomic data from patients with relatively uncommon hematological malignancies, which may create a risk of re-identification even after removal of direct identifiers. Data may only be processed and transferred in accordance with participant consent, the General Data Protection Regulation, applicable Danish legislation, institutional requirements, and relevant data-transfer agreements. Aggregate and anonymized study results will be reported through the applicable trial registries and scientific publications.

Locations