Federated Learning in Renal Tumor Model
Research on the Application of Federated Learning in the Construction of Deep Learning Models for Renal Tumor Imaging
1 other identifier
observational
3,000
1 country
6
Brief Summary
This is a multicenter, retrospective and prospective diagnostic clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness and safety of CascadeDiagnose Renal Tumor CT, an AI-assisted detection system for renal tumors based on contrast-enhanced multiphase CT imaging. The system employs a cascaded deep learning architecture to perform fully automated analysis of multiphase CT images, covering image quality review, lesion detection and segmentation, benign-malignant differentiation, and risk stratification, with traceable evidence chains and interpretable outputs. The study is conducted across six tertiary hospitals in Guangxi, China, utilizing a distributed "data stays on-site, computation moves across centers" federated learning network, which ensures that original patient data remain within each hospital while encrypted intermediate features are shared for cross-center collaborative analysis. A total of at least 3000 patients with renal tumors will be enrolled (approximately 2600 in the retrospective phase and 400 in the prospective phase). The primary effectiveness outcomes include area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). The primary safety outcomes include false negative rate, false positive rate, and adverse events. The study also incorporates a multi-reader, multi-case (MRMC) design to compare the diagnostic performance of the AI system with radiologists of varying seniority, and to evaluate the system's utility in assisting junior radiologists. The findings of this study are expected to provide high-quality clinical evidence for the regulatory approval of this AI-assisted diagnostic system as a Class III medical device.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Sep 2026
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 19, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 25, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 30, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 30, 2028
September 25, 2026
September 1, 2026
2 years
August 19, 2026
September 21, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Dice Similarity Coefficient for Renal Tumor Segmentation
The primary outcome measure is the Dice Similarity Coefficient for renal tumor segmentation on contrast-enhanced CT, comparing the federated learning model against a centralized training model with a non-inferiority margin of Δ = -0.05. This outcome will be assessed at the end of the model training phase using an independent multi-center test set.
The primary outcome will be measured in October 2027, upon completion of model training, final parameter aggregation, and ensemble model establishment, using the test set from the multi-center retrospective cohort.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Classification Performance Metrics and Heterogeneity Impact Assessment
Assessed at the completion of the model training phase, approximately 18 months after study initiation, following final aggregation and ensemble construction, using the independent multi-center test set, with center-specific and subtype-specific analyses
Study Arms (2)
Malignant renal tumor
Benign renal tumor
Eligibility Criteria
The study population consists of approximately 3,000 patients with pathologically confirmed renal tumors (benign or malignant) who underwent contrast-enhanced CT at ten Guangxi hospitals between January 2019 and June 2026. Cases are consecutively enrolled using a unified time window and strict inclusion/exclusion criteria. Eligible patients must have complete pre-operative contrast-enhanced CT, good image quality, and traceable clinical-pathological data. Exclusions include non-contrast CT only, severe artifacts, prior nephrectomy (except recurrence/residual), and incomplete data. Enrollment targets are 600 cases at the lead site and 300 at each of the nine participating centers.
You may qualify if:
- Patients pathologically confirmed as having renal tumors (either benign or malignant) by surgery or biopsy;
- Underwent contrastenhanced renal CT before surgery or treatment;
- CT images are of good quality and clearly depict the renal lesion contour;
- Complete and traceable clinical and pathological data.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who did not undergo contrastenhanced CT before surgery, or only had noncontrast CT;
- CT images with significant motion artifacts, metal artifacts, or excessive noise that impair lesion assessment;
- Lesions too small (maximum diameter \<1 mm) or not identifiable on imaging;
- Patients who previously underwent partial or radical nephrectomy for renal tumors (except for recurrent/residual lesions);
- Incomplete clinical data or pathological results.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (6)
Guigang People's Hospital
Guigang, Guangxi, 537100, China
Guilin People's Hospital
Guilin, Guangxi, 541002, China
Liuzhou People's Hospital
Liuzhou, Guangxi, 545006, China
Nanning Second People's Hospital
Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, China
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University
Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, China
Wuzhou Red Cross Hospital
Wuzhou, Guangxi, 543002, China
Related Publications (3)
Xi IL, Zhao Y, Wang R, Chang M, Purkayastha S, Chang K, Huang RY, Silva AC, Vallieres M, Habibollahi P, Fan Y, Zou B, Gade TP, Zhang PJ, Soulen MC, Zhang Z, Bai HX, Stavropoulos SW. Deep Learning to Distinguish Benign from Malignant Renal Lesions Based on Routine MR Imaging. Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Apr 15;26(8):1944-1952. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-0374. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
PMID: 31937619BACKGROUNDBex A, Ghanem YA, Albiges L, Bonn S, Campi R, Capitanio U, Dabestani S, Hora M, Klatte T, Kuusk T, Lund L, Marconi L, Palumbo C, Pignot G, Powles T, Schouten N, Tran M, Volpe A, Bedke J. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: The 2025 Update. Eur Urol. 2025 Jun;87(6):683-696. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2025.02.020. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
PMID: 40118739BACKGROUNDSung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
PMID: 33538338BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Min Qin, MD
First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Target Duration
- 2 Years
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Vice president of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 19, 2026
First Posted
September 25, 2026
Study Start
September 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 30, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 30, 2028
Last Updated
September 25, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual Participant Data (IPD) will not be shared in this study. The primary reasons are threefold: (1) strict legal restrictions under China's Data Security Law and Personal Information Protection Law prohibit cross-institutional transfer of raw medical data without explicit consent; (2) as a retrospective study spanning several years, obtaining renewed consent from all participants is practically infeasible; and (3) the core federated learning framework inherently eliminates the need for IPD sharing-only encrypted model parameters are transmitted, while raw CT images and clinical data remain securely stored at each participating center. This design fully protects patient privacy, complies with all regulatory requirements, and ensures the study's collaborative objectives are achieved without ever exposing individual-level data.