Effects of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-Based Counseling in Women Experiencing Intimate Partner Violence
The Effect of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)-Based Counseling on Emotion Regulation Difficulties, Psychological Flexibility, and Decision-Making Styles in Women Seeking Psychiatric Help With a History of Intimate Partner Violence
2 other identifiers
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial was to determine the effects of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)-based counseling on emotion regulation difficulties, psychological flexibility, and decision-making styles in women with a history of intimate partner violence. The study included women who sought care at the Psychiatry Outpatient Clinic of a state hospital, had a history of intimate partner violence, met the eligibility criteria, and volunteered to participate. A total of 60 women were assigned to the experimental group (n=30) or control group (n=30) using stratified block randomization. Data were collected using an Individual Information Form, the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-Short Form, the Psychological Flexibility Scale, and the Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire. Data were collected from both groups at two time points, as pre-test and post-test assessments, between October 2023 and January 2024. Following the pre-test assessments, participants in the experimental group received six sessions of ACT-based counseling, while participants in the control group received no intervention during the study period. After completion of the intervention, post-test assessments were administered to both groups. The study compared the experimental and control groups to evaluate the effects of ACT-based counseling on emotion regulation difficulties, psychological flexibility, and decision-making styles.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 25, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 5, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 29, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 18, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 25, 2026
CompletedSeptember 25, 2026
September 1, 2026
2 months
September 18, 2026
September 24, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Psychological Flexibility
Psychological flexibility was assessed using the Psychological Flexibility Scale, adapted into Turkish by Karakuş and Akbay (2020). The scale consists of 28 items rated on a 7-point Likert scale (1-7), yielding a total score ranging from 28 to 196. Higher total scores indicate greater psychological flexibility. The scale was administered to participants in both the intervention and control groups at baseline and immediately after completion of the 6-week intervention.
Baseline and immediately after completion of the 6-week intervention (1 session per week for 6 weeks)
Decision-Making Self-Esteem and Decision-Making Styles
Decision-making self-esteem and decision-making styles were assessed using the Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire (MDMQ I-II), adapted into Turkish by Deniz (2004). Part I consists of 6 items and assesses decision-making self-esteem, with scores ranging from 0 to 12; higher scores indicate higher decision-making self-esteem. Part II consists of 22 items and assesses four decision-making styles: vigilance (score range: 0-12), buck-passing (0-12), procrastination (0-10), and hypervigilance (0-10). Higher scores on each subscale indicate greater use of the respective decision-making style. The questionnaire was administered to participants in both the intervention and control groups at baseline and immediately after completion of the 6-week intervention.
Baseline and immediately after completion of the 6-week intervention (1 session per week for 6 weeks)
Emotion Regulation Difficulties
Emotion regulation difficulties were assessed using the 16-item Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-Short Form (DERS-SF), adapted into Turkish by Yiğit and Guzey Yiğit (2017). Each item is rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (almost never) to 5 (almost always), yielding a total score ranging from 16 to 80. Higher total scores indicate greater difficulties in emotion regulation. The scale was administered to participants in both the intervention and control groups at baseline and immediately after completion of the 6-week intervention.
Baseline and immediately after completion of the 6-week intervention (1 session per week for 6 weeks)
Study Arms (2)
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm received an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)-based counseling intervention consisting of six sessions conducted at 7-10-day intervals. Each session lasted approximately 30-60 minutes. The first session was conducted individually and face-to-face, while the remaining five sessions were conducted online via video communication.
Control Group
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants in this arm received no intervention during the study period and completed the same outcome assessments as the intervention group.
Interventions
The intervention consisted of six Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)-based counseling sessions conducted at 7-10-day intervals. Each session lasted approximately 30-60 minutes. The first session was conducted individually and face-to-face, while the remaining five sessions were conducted online via video communication. The intervention was designed to address emotion regulation difficulties, psychological flexibility, and decision-making styles.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Being over 18 years of age
- Being literate
- Having a history of spousal violence
- Being followed for anxiety problems related to a history of spousal violence
- Being willing to cooperate and communicate
- Agreeing to fully participate in the 6-week counseling period
You may not qualify if:
- Having a previously diagnosed psychiatric disorder
- Currently receiving another form of psychotherapy
- Having cognitive impairment
- Having a comorbid mental disorder
- Using a language other than Turkish
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ondokuzmayis University
Samsun, Samsun, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Eda GUNGOR, MSc
Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- The independent data analyst was blinded to group allocation during the statistical analysis. Group identities were coded and were not disclosed to the analyst until the analyses were completed.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 18, 2026
First Posted
September 25, 2026
Study Start
October 25, 2023
Primary Completion
January 5, 2024
Study Completion
January 29, 2024
Last Updated
September 25, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data will not be publicly shared due to the sensitive nature of the study population and the need to protect participant confidentiality and privacy.