NCT07836972

Brief Summary

Children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are likely to exhibit behavioral difficulties in the classroom that inhibit learning (Daley \& Birchwood, 2010; DuPaul \& Stoner, 2003; Fabiano et al., 2006; Friedman \& Pfiffner, 2020; Loe \& Feldman, 2007; Raggi \& Chronis, 2006; Rapport, Chung, Shore, \& Isaacs, 2001). These issues make addressing ADHD an area in need of continuous and contemporary support, particularly during early elementary school (Bitsko et al., 2022), in order to prevent the worsening, life-long issues that individuals with ADHD may confront throughout the lifespan. The present application focuses on supports and interventions for students in elementary school, as that is where initial identification and intervention typically occurs (Visser et al., 2014). With the advent of Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) within school settings, a systematic approach to the delivery of universal, targeted, and indicated school mental health and educational supports may be enhanced. The most intensive tier of the MTSS (i.e., Tier 3) is currently the most under-developed. The creation of a positive behavioral support classroom through Tier 3 of the MTSS will assist teachers in improving the positive behavioral support provided to the student with ADHD. Thus, the present investigation will be situated within everyday school procedures for supporting a student with behaviors consistent with ADHD. Participants will be 288 elementary school children recruited from participating school districts within the existing school-based problem solving teams. We will work with grades kindergarten to sixth. Referred children will then all receive a lead-in, Tier 2 intervention to include a daily report card (DRC) intervention. Those who continue to need additional behavior supports in the Spring -- Tier 3 intervention -- will be allocated through random assignment to School as Usual or Academic/Behavior Competency (ACE) classroom in a Hybrid Type 1 design. The ACE classroom is an approach based on decades of research in summer treatment program classrooms (Fabiano et al., 2007; Pelham et al., 2025). Aim 1 evaluates the outcomes of the approach relative to school as usual. Aim 2 evaluates the implementation of the approach and explores components of user implementation that promote fidelity. Aim 3 explores moderators of the intervention outcomes (e.g., comorbid oppositional/aggressive behavior or learning disabilities).

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
544

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
57mo left

Started Jan 2027

Longer than P75 for phase_2

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 17, 2026

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 23, 2026

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2027

Expected
3.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 31, 2030

1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 31, 2031

Last Updated

September 28, 2026

Status Verified

September 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3.7 years

First QC Date

September 17, 2026

Last Update Submit

September 23, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

ADHDschool interventionpositive behavior support

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Count of Child rule violations

    Observation of frequency of rule violations

    Baseline, End of School year 1, Beginning of School year 2, Middle of School year 2, End of School year 2

  • IOWA Connors Rating Scale

    Total Score on Inattentive/Overactive Factor

    Baseline, End of School year 1, Beginning of School year 2, Middle of School year 2, End of School year 2

  • Impairment Rating Scale

    Baseline, End of School year 1, Beginning of School year 2, Middle of School year 2, End of School year 2

Study Arms (2)

School as Usual

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Lead-in Intervention followed by Assignment to School as Usual

Behavioral: School as Usual Classroom Supports

Academic Competency Enhancement (ACE) classroom

EXPERIMENTAL

Lead-in Intervention followed by Assignment to Academic Competency Enhancement (ACE) classroom

Behavioral: Academic Competency Enhancement (ACE) classroom

Interventions

This arm will include school as usual procedures for students.

School as Usual

Children assigned to ACE will enroll in a classroom with a teacher trained to implement contingency management components throughout the school year.

Academic Competency Enhancement (ACE) classroom

Eligibility Criteria

Age4 Years - 12 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Elevated ADHD symptoms and impairment and referred to school-based support team for intervention.
  • Attending grades kindergarten - fifth

You may not qualify if:

  • Special education classification for academics or behavior
  • Behavior concerns at a level that would make lead-in treatment inappropriate/of insufficient intensity

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity

Interventions

Schools

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior DisordersNeurodevelopmental DisordersMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Non-Medical Public and Private Facilities

Study Officials

  • Gregory A. Fabiano, Ph.D.

    Florida International University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Gregory A. Fabiano, Ph.D.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: All participants will receive a lead-in positive behavior support intervention; those who exhibit continued impairment will be randomly assigned to the intervention classroom or school as usual.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 17, 2026

First Posted

September 23, 2026

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2031

Last Updated

September 28, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share
Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF