The Interactive Media and Gender-related Stressors and Strengths Study
IMAGES
2 other identifiers
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Emerging adulthood is a key developmental period with unique challenges, including elevated risk of substance use (including risky drinking, cigarette use, and illicit drug use), eating disorder symptoms, and severe psychological distress and suicidal ideation. This critical developmental period also offers an important opportunity for interventions to prevent adverse mental health outcomes in adulthood, particularly those related to substance use and disordered eating behaviors. Research suggests several relevant potential targets for preventive interventions in this age group. Online media, especially social media (e.g., Instagram), are used by 90% of U.S. young adults, offering unprecedented access to informational and social support for young adults. Yet online media also provide new channels for harmful exposure to stigma (e.g., online harassment) and sociocultural appearance ideals for young adults. Such exposures may cause or exacerbate substance use and adverse mental health outcomes. Existing brief interventions that improve media literacy (i.e., the ability to critically analyze and interpret media) and increase resistance to harmful sociocultural appearance ideals offer promise in supporting young adults to reduce body dissatisfaction and stress and coping behaviors (like substance use and disordered eating behaviors). However, these interventions have not previously accounted for the core role of body dissatisfaction or unique dimensions of social media literacy in young adults' health. Further, existing preventive interventions in this area have primarily been developed and tested with a focus on cisgender young people. To date, there are no gender-inclusive evidence-based interventions to address both social media-based stressors (e.g., harassment, appearance ideals) and resilience factors (e.g., social support) for young adults.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 18, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 23, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2028
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2028
September 23, 2026
September 1, 2026
1.8 years
August 18, 2026
September 17, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Digital toolkit feasibility
A validated scale by Weiner et al., 2017 will be used to assess feasibility. It has 4 items assessing dimensions of feasibility (e.g., "The digital toolkit seems like a good match"), with response options ranging from Completely agree (1) to Completely disagree (5). Scores can range from 4 to 20 and lower scores suggest greater feasibility.
24-48 hours after web-based intervention
Digital toolkit acceptability
A validated scale by Weiner et al., 2017 will be used to assess acceptability. It has 4 items assessing perceived acceptability of the digital toolkit (e.g., "The digital toolkit was appealing to me"), with response options ranging from Completely agree (1) to Completely disagree (5). Scores can range from 4 to 20 and lower scores suggest greater acceptability.
24-48 hours after web-based intervention
Digital toolkit appropriateness
2 relevant items from a Intervention Appropriateness Measure (Weiner et al., 2017) e.g., ("The digital toolkit seems easy to use"). Response options range from Completely agree (1) to Completely disagree (5). Scores can range from 2 to 10 and lower scores suggest greater appropriateness.
24-48 hours after web-based intervention
Digital toolkit satisfaction
The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (Larson, 1979) which is a validated 8-item scale will be used to assess . Response options are tailored to specific items, with higher scores always indicating greater satisfaction, for example: i. How would you rate the quality of the digital toolkit? Response options: Poor (1) to Excellent (5) ii. If you were to seek help again, would you come back to the toolkit? Response options: No, definitely not (1) to Yes, definitely (4) iii. To what extent has the toolkit met your needs? Response options: Almost all of my needs have been met (4) to None of my needs have been met (1) iv. How satisfied are you with the amount of information you received in the toolkit? Response options: Quite dissatisfied (1) to Very satisfied (4) v. Has the toolkit helped you to deal more effectively with your problems? Response options: Yes, it helped a great deal (4) to No, it seemed to make things worse (1)
24-48 hours after web-based intervention, 3-months after web-based intervention
Other Outcomes (7)
Social media literacy skills
baseline, 24-48 hours after web-based intervention, 3-months after web-based intervention
Social media use intensity
baseline, 3-months after web-based intervention
Appearance ideal internalization
baseline, 24-48 hours after web-based intervention, 3-months after web-based intervention
- +4 more other outcomes
Study Arms (1)
IMAGES Project Digital Toolkit
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will be encouraged to complete the modules on an interactive website with a series of short didactic videos and interactive activities.
Interventions
A brief, web-based psychoeducational intervention with 5 self-guided activities that build social media literacy skills which takes 25-45 minutes to complete.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Reside in United States
- Have access to computer, tablet, or mobile device with internet access
- Have used any social media platform in the past week
You may not qualify if:
- Unable to understand and read English
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Boston Universitylead
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Boston University School of Public Health and online website
Boston, Massachusetts, 02118, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Allegra R Gordon, ScD, MPH
Boston University School of Public Health, Community Health Services
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 18, 2026
First Posted
September 23, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
November 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2028
Last Updated
September 23, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share