Noninvasive High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation Versus Nasal Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation After Extubation in Neonates
NOV-A
Effectiveness of Noninvasive High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation Versus Nasal Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation as Post Extubation Respiratory Support in Neonates Born At ≥ 26 Weeks' Gestation: A Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
172
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn which breathing support works better after removing a newborn's breathing tube. Researchers will study newborns born at 26 weeks of gestation or later. Each newborn will have received breathing support through a tube for at least 24 hours. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (nHFOV) lower the need to replace the breathing tube within 72 hours? What breathing, feeding, or other medical problems occur with each type of support? Researchers will compare nHFOV with nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation (NIMV). nHFOV provides very rapid pressure waves through the nose. NIMV provides regular, timed breaths through the nose. The researchers will compare these methods to see which works better after breathing tube removal. Participants will: Be assigned by chance to receive either nHFOV or NIMV Receive the assigned breathing support immediately after tube removal Have their breathing, oxygen level, and general condition closely monitored Have blood tests at 1, 12, and 24 hours post extubation to assess their breathing Be monitored for breathing pauses, feeding problems, and other medical problems during hospitalization
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 5, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 23, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 3, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 21, 2029
September 23, 2026
September 1, 2026
2 years
September 5, 2026
September 19, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of Participants With Extubation Failure Within 72 Hours
Extubation failure is defined as reintubation and return to invasive mechanical ventilation within 72 hours after planned extubation. Reintubation will be based on at least one prespecified criterion: pH below 7.20 with carbon dioxide above 65 mmHg, need for 60% or more oxygen to maintain the target oxygen saturation, an episode requiring bag mask ventilation, severe respiratory distress or a Silverman Anderson score of 7 or higher or cardiorespiratory arrest requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The outcome will be reported as the number and percentage of participants with extubation failure in each group.
Within 72 hours after planned extubation
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Proportion of Participants With Clinically Significant Apnea
Within 72 hours after planned extubation
Proportion of Participants With Feeding Intolerance
Within 72 hours after planned extubation
Post-extubation blood pH
At 1, 12, and 24 hours after planned extubation
Post-extubation partial pressure of carbon dioxide
At 1, 12, and 24 hours after planned extubation
Post-extubation SpO₂/FiO₂ ratio
At 1, 12, and 24 hours after planned extubation
Other Outcomes (13)
Time to Extubation Failure
From planned extubation through 72 hours after extubation
Proportion of Participants With Air Leak Syndrome
Up to 7 days after planned extubation or until discontinuation of the assigned nHFOV or NIMV support, whichever occurs first
Proportion of Participants With Nasal Injury During the Assigned Intervention
Up to 7 days after planned extubation or until discontinuation of the assigned nHFOV or NIMV support, whichever occurs first
- +10 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Noninvasive High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation (nHFOV)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants assigned to this arm will receive noninvasive high frequency oscillatory ventilation immediately after their first planned extubation. Respiratory support will be delivered through binasal prongs or a nasal mask. Initial mean airway pressure will be 10-12 cm H₂O, amplitude will be 15-25 cm H₂O, frequency will be 8-12 Hz, and the inspiratory to expiratory ratio will be 1:1. Settings may be adjusted according to the participant's clinical condition. Oxygen will be adjusted to maintain oxygen saturation between 90% and 95%.
Nasal Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation (NIMV)
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants assigned to this arm will receive nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation immediately after their first planned extubation. Respiratory support will be delivered through binasal prongs or a nasal mask. Positive end expiratory pressure will be 8-12 cm H₂O, peak inspiratory pressure will be 18-24 cm H₂O, the initial breathing rate will be 30 breaths per minute, and inspiratory time will be 0.5 seconds. The breathing rate may be increased in steps of 5 to a maximum of 50 breaths per minute according to the participant's clinical condition. Oxygen will be adjusted to maintain oxygen saturation between 90% and 95%. Synchronization will not be used.
Interventions
NIMV will begin immediately after planned extubation and will be delivered through binasal prongs or a nasal mask. Positive end expiratory pressure will be 8-12 cm H₂O, and peak inspiratory pressure will be 18-24 cm H₂O. The initial breathing rate will be 30 breaths per minute and may be increased in steps of 5 to a maximum of 50 breaths per minute according to carbon dioxide levels and clinical assessment. Inspiratory time will be 0.5 seconds. Oxygen will be adjusted to maintain oxygen saturation between 90% and 95%. Synchronization will not be used.
nHFOV will begin immediately after planned extubation and will be delivered through binasal prongs or a nasal mask. Initial mean airway pressure will be 10-12 cm H₂O and may be increased in 1 cm H₂O steps to a maximum of 20 cm H₂O. Initial amplitude will be 15-25 cm H₂O and may be increased in 5 cm H₂O steps to a maximum of 35 cm H₂O. Frequency will be 8-12 Hz, and the inspiratory to expiratory ratio will be 1:1. Oxygen will be adjusted to maintain oxygen saturation between 90% and 95%. Settings will be adjusted according to the participant's clinical condition.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Gestational age at birth ≥26 weeks (inborn or outborn)
- Postmenstrual age \<44 weeks at enrollment according to NICU AKUH admission criteria
- Intubation for respiratory distress or respiratory failure
- Intubated for ≥24 hours
- Undergoing first planned extubation
- Meets prespecified extubation readiness criteria
- Written informed consent from a parent or legal guardian
You may not qualify if:
- Birth weight \<500 g
- Major congenital anomaly affecting cardiac or respiratory function
- Upper airway anomaly
- Neuromuscular disorder affecting respiration
- Requirement for surgical intervention during the study period
- Grade IV intraventricular hemorrhage diagnosed before randomization
- Intubation solely for an elective procedure in an otherwise healthy neonate previously breathing room air
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi Stadium Road, P.O.Box 3500 Karachi 74800, Pakistan
Karachi, Sindh, 74800, Pakistan
Related Publications (4)
Mei Z, Ming L, Wu Z, Zhu Y. Use of NHFOV vs. NIPPV for the respiratory support of preterm newborns after extubation: A meta-analysis. Front Pediatr. 2023 Jan 11;10:1063387. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.1063387. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 36714640BACKGROUNDZhu X, Qi H, Feng Z, Shi Y, De Luca D; Nasal Oscillation Post-Extubation (NASONE) Study Group. Noninvasive High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation vs Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure vs Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation as Postextubation Support for Preterm Neonates in China: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2022 Jun 1;176(6):551-559. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.0710.
PMID: 35467744BACKGROUNDSeth S, Saha B, Saha AK, Mukherjee S, Hazra A. Nasal HFOV versus nasal IPPV as a post-extubation respiratory support in preterm infants-a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Pediatr. 2021 Oct;180(10):3151-3160. doi: 10.1007/s00431-021-04084-1. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
PMID: 33890156BACKGROUNDLi Y, Wei Q, Zhao D, Mo Y, Yao L, Li L, Tan W, Pan X, Yao J, Dai W, Zhong D. Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in preterm infants after extubation: a randomized, controlled trial. J Int Med Res. 2021 Feb;49(2):300060520984915. doi: 10.1177/0300060520984915.
PMID: 33641473BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ali S Hussain, FCPS Paediatrics, Neonatology
Aga Khan University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- The independent biostatistician conducting the primary analysis will be masked to the intervention identities. The study groups will be coded as Group A and Group B until the primary analysis is completed. This explains why the trial is registered as open-label while the statistical analysis remains masked.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor of Paediatrics
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 5, 2026
First Posted
September 23, 2026
Study Start
October 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 3, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 21, 2029
Last Updated
September 23, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There is no current plan to share individual participant data with external researchers. Participants are newborn infants, and the study will collect sensitive clinical information. The consent and data protection procedures do not provide for unrestricted public release of participant level data. Study findings will be reported in aggregate form through scientific presentations, trial registries, and peer-reviewed publications. Any future request for de-identified participant data would require review and approval by the study investigators, Aga Khan University Ethics Review Committee, and relevant institutional data governance authorities.