Application of Alloplastic Bone Graft With Polycaprolactone (PCL) Membrane and ECM-Collagen Membrane on Secondary Socket Healing in Third Molar Surgery.
PCL ECM
A Comparative Study on the Application of Alloplastic Bone Graft With Polycaprolactone (PCL) Membrane and ECM-Collagen Membrane on Secondary Socket Healing in Third Molar Surgery.
2 other identifiers
interventional
18
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study compared two membrane materials: 1. polycaprolactone (PCL) and 2. Extracellular matrix collagen membrane (ECM) as alternative. This is to see how well they prevent bone and gum damage after lower wisdom tooth removal. In this split-mouth trial, participants had both lower wisdom teeth removed, with one socket receiving PCL membrane and the other receiving ECM membrane after socket filled with EthOss (an alloplastic bone graft). Over a 24-week follow-up period, researchers tracked patient clinically on their comfort, gum healing, and new bone growth using X-rays.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started May 2025
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 2, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 11, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 22, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2027
September 22, 2026
September 1, 2026
1.7 years
September 11, 2026
September 16, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Periodontal health assessment on lower second molar (1)
1\. Modified Plaque Score (from Score 0: No plaque present. Score 1: No visible plaque, but a periodontal probe skimmed across the tooth surface reveals soft plaque biofilm on the tip. Score 2: Visible plaque that can be easily seen with the naked eye without using a probe., modified bleeding score and gingival recession, periodontal pocketing depth)-- the lower the score, the better the periodontal health.
baseline on day of surgery, 12 weeks and 24 weeks after surgery
Periodontal health assessment on lower second molar (2)
Modified Bleeding Score (Score 0: No bleeding observed after probing. Score 1: Bleeding is present.)-- the lower the score, the better the periodontal health
baseline on day of surgery, 12 weeks and 24 weeks after surgery
Periodontal health assessment on lower second molar (3)
Periodontal Pocketing Depth (PPD) (measurement in milimeter, 1-3mm indicate healthy sulcus while \>5mm indicate periodontal disesase)-- the lower the score, the better the periodontal health.
baseline on day of surgery, 12 weeks and 24 weeks after surgery
Periodontal health assessment on lower second molar (4)
Gingival Recession- measurement in mm for gingival margin below the cementoenamel junction. - the lower the score, the better the periodontal health.
baseline on day of surgery, 12 weeks and 24 weeks after surgery
Periodontal health assessment on lower second molar (5)
The healing index of Landry (Grade 1 poor to Grade 5 excellent)
baseline on day of surgery, 12 weeks and 24 weeks after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (2)
The width of keratinized tissue
baseline on day of surgery, 12 weeks and 24 weeks after surgery
Bone gain at distal of lower second molar
radiograph taken prior to surgery and 24 weeks after surgery
Study Arms (2)
PCL membrane
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis is a split-mouth, randomized, within-subject clinical trial using a crossover assignment model. Each participant serves as their own control, receiving both Intervention 1. PCL membrane and Intervention 2. ECM collagen membrane after socket filled with Ethoss alloplast material simultaneously on either sides of the lower third molar
ECM collagen membrane
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis is a split-mouth, randomized, within-subject clinical trial using a crossover assignment model. Each participant serves as their own control, receiving both Intervention 1. PCL membrane and Intervention 2. ECM collagen membrane after socket filled with Ethoss alloplast material simultaneously on either sides of the lower third molar
Interventions
This is a split-mouth, randomized, within-subject clinical trial using a crossover assignment model. Each participant serves as their own control, receiving both Intervention 1. PCL membrane and Intervention 2.ECM collagen membrane simultaneously on opposite sides of the lower third molar after socket filled up with alloplast.
This is a split-mouth, randomized, within-subject clinical trial using a crossover assignment model. Each participant serves as their own control, receiving both Intervention 1. PCL membrane and Intervention 2.ECM collagen membrane simultaneously on opposite sides of the lower third molar after socket filled up with alloplast.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient who requires surgical removal of bilateral impacted M3.
- Patient with impacted bilateral M3 which are sound.
- Impacted bilateral M3 classified as Class I or II with Level A or B according to Pell and Gregory's classification.
- Presence of disease-free mandibular second molar (M2) adjacent to the M3 to be extracted
- Patient aged 18 to 35 years old who are medically fit
You may not qualify if:
- Impacted M3 associated with:
- Fracture of angle of mandible.
- Radiological evidence of cyst or tumour.
- Incomplete root formation.
- Acute pulpitis or severe pericoronitis that is not under controlled.
- Gross dental caries.
- Retained roots of mandibular third molar with history of removal or coronectomy of unerupted/impacted M3.
- Patients with periodontal disease
- Patients with absence of lower second molars.
- Medically compromised patients
- Pregnant women.
- Patient on oral contraceptives.
- Current or previous bisphosphonate therapy or history of radiotherapy to the jaws.
- Active smokers
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Malayalead
- Osteopore Internationalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Malaya
Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia
Related Publications (1)
Aimetti, M., Romano, F., Pigella, E., Pranzini, F., & Debernaerdi, C. (2005). Treatment of Wide, Shallow, and Predominantly 1-Wall Intrabony Defects With a Bioabsorbable Membrane: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Journal of Periodontology, 76(8), 1354-1361. Bohner, M., Santoni, B. L. G., & Dobelin, N. (2020). Beta-tricalcium phosphate for bone substitution: Synthesis and properties. Acta Biomater, 113, 23-41. Canullo, L., Rossi-Fedele, G., Camodeca, F., Menini, M., & Pesce, P. (2021). A Pilot Retrospective Study on the Effect of Bone Grafting after Wisdom Teeth Extraction. Materials (Basel), 14(11https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14112844). Chen, G., Sato, T., Ohgushi, H., Ushida, T., Tateishi, T., & Tanaka, J. (2005). Culturing of skin fibroblasts in a thin PLGA-collagen hybrid mesh. Biomaterials, 26(15), 2559-2566. De Angelis, N., Pesce, P., Poedjiastoeti, W., Suwandi, T., Tjandrawinata, R., Bagnasco, F., & Menini, M. (2024). 3D-Printable Biopolymers for Socket Preservation Technique: Soft Tissues Response: A Pilot Randomised Clinical Study. Dent J (Basel), 12(10). Retrieved Oct 7, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39452449 Dodson, T. B. (2004). Management of Mandibular Third Molar Extraction Sites to Prevent Periodontal Defects. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 62(10), 1213-1224. Fairbairn, P., Kilner, S., O'Hooley, D., Fish, A., & Kurtzman, G. M. (2023). Sinus Augmentation for Implant Placement Utilizing a Novel Synthetic Graft Material with Delayed Immediate Socket Grafting: A 2-Year Case Study. J. Clin. Med, 12(1). Goh, B. T., Teh, L. Y., Tan, D. B., Zhang, Z., & Teoh, S. H. (2015). Novel 3D polycaprolactone scaffold for ridge preservation--a pilot randomised controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res, 26(3), 271-277. Retrieved Mar, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25263527 Jambhekar, S., Kernen, F., & Bidra, A. S. (2015). Clinical and histologic outcomes of socket grafting after flapless tooth extraction:
BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Wei Cheong Ngeow, PhD
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Malaya, Malaysia
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rou Enn Ng, BDS
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Malaya, Malaysia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor Dr
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 11, 2026
First Posted
September 22, 2026
Study Start
May 2, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 30, 2027
Last Updated
September 22, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared to protect participant confidentiality and privacy. The informed consent approved by the Ethics Committee/Institutional Review Board (IRB) did not include explicit authorization from participants for secondary data sharing or broad external repository deposition. Furthermore, due to the granular nature of the clinical data collected, full de-identification cannot be guaranteed without risk of re-identification. Aggregate data, summary statistics, and primary outcomes will instead be made available through peer-reviewed publications.