Perioperative Nursing Workload, Missed Care, and Near-Miss Events
1 other identifier
observational
330
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This prospective, single-center observational study examines the relationship between perioperative nursing workload and safety-critical perioperative nursing care in the operating rooms of Agri Training and Research Hospital. Guided by the Donabedian structure-process-outcome framework, the study will directly observe eligible surgical procedures to record objective, procedure-level workload indicators (interruptions, task-switching, concurrent duties, procedure duration, shift timing, and equipment/supply shortages) together with the observed perioperative nurse's self-reported workload using the Turkish NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX), and a structured observation of nine safety-critical perioperative nursing care tasks (identification/procedure/site verification, allergy and critical preoperative information verification, positioning and pressure-injury prevention, normothermia, surgical counts, specimen/label verification, equipment and implant readiness, handoff, and documentation). Any delayed or omitted safety-critical care items, and any near-miss or process-deviation events identified and corrected before patient harm, will also be recorded using standardized forms. The study does not involve patients as direct research participants; only the perioperative work environment and voluntarily participating nurses are observed, and routine clinical care, staffing assignments, and surgical decisions will not be modified. The primary aim is to determine whether higher perioperative nursing workload is associated with a higher rate of missed/delayed safety-critical nursing care at the procedure level; secondary aims examine the association between missed safety-critical care and near-miss/process-deviation events, and, if sufficient events occur, whether missed safety-critical care mediates part of the relationship between workload and near-miss/process-deviation events.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Oct 2026
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 16, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 22, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2026
September 24, 2026
September 1, 2026
2 months
September 16, 2026
September 21, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Missed Safety-Critical Perioperative Nursing Care Index
Proportion of applicable safety-critical perioperative nursing care items (patient/procedure/surgical-site verification, allergy and critical preoperative information verification, positioning and pressure-injury prevention, normothermia, surgical count, specimen/label verification, equipment/implant readiness, safe handoff, and required documentation) scored as delayed/partial or not done, divided by the total number of applicable safety-critical items for that procedure, as directly observed using the Safety-Critical Perioperative Nursing Care Observation Form.
Assessed once per surgical procedure during the intraoperative period (from procedure start to end), for procedures observed over approximately 8-12 weeks between October 2026 and December 2026
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Occurrence of Near-Miss/Process-Deviation Events
Assessed once per surgical procedure during the intraoperative period, for procedures observed over approximately 8-12 weeks between October 2026 and December 2026
Total Objective Workload Events per Procedure
Assessed once per surgical procedure during the intraoperative period, for procedures observed over approximately 8-12 weeks between October 2026 and December 2026
Perceived and Objective Perioperative Nursing Workload
Assessed once per surgical procedure, shortly after procedure completion, for procedures observed over approximately 8-12 weeks between October 2026 and December 2026
Study Arms (1)
Perioperative Nurses and Observed Surgical Procedures
Perioperative nurses working in the operating rooms of Agri Training and Research Hospital who voluntarily consent to participate, together with the eligible elective/planned surgical procedures in which a participating nurse is actively on duty during the study period. Each eligible procedure is directly observed by a researcher using a standardized objective workload observation form and a structured safety-critical perioperative nursing care observation form; near-miss/process-deviation events are logged using a standardized form; and the observed nurse completes the Turkish NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) shortly after the procedure. No experimental intervention, diagnostic test, or change to routine clinical care is assigned; participants are observed under usual perioperative practice.
Interventions
No experimental intervention is administered. Eligible surgical procedures are directly observed by a researcher using a standardized Procedure and Objective Workload Observation Form and a structured Safety-Critical Perioperative Nursing Care Observation Form, and any near-miss/process-deviation events are recorded on a standardized log form. The observed perioperative nurse additionally completes the Turkish adaptation of the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) shortly after the procedure to assess self-reported workload. Routine clinical care, staffing assignments, and surgical decision-making are not modified by these observation and assessment procedures.
Eligibility Criteria
Perioperative (operating room) nurses working at Agri Training and Research Hospital, and the elective/planned surgical procedures in which participating nurses are actively on duty during the study period, meeting the eligibility criteria above. Patients undergoing the observed procedures are not direct research participants.
You may qualify if:
- Actively on duty as a perioperative (operating room) nurse at Agri Training and Research Hospital
- At least 3 months of operating room experience
- Voluntary agreement to participate and to complete the post-procedure NASA-TLX form
You may not qualify if:
- Extended leave or medical report resulting in inactive duty during the data collection period
- Withdrawal from the study
- Failure to complete the post-procedure workload assessment form
- Performed in the operating rooms of Agri Training and Research Hospital
- Involves a participating perioperative nurse who is actively on duty
- Elective or planned surgical procedure
- At least a portion of the safety-critical care items are directly observable
- Emergency/resuscitative circumstances that would affect the clinical flow being observed
- Procedures in which observation could not be completed
- Observation records missing core variables
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Volkan Gokmenlead
Study Sites (1)
Agri Training and Research Hospital
Ağrı, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (14)
Association of periOperative Registered Nurses (AORN). Guidelines for Perioperative Practice. Current edition. Denver, CO: AORN.
BACKGROUNDWheelock A, Suliman A, Wharton R, Babu ED, Hull L, Vincent C, Sevdalis N, Arora S. The Impact of Operating Room Distractions on Stress, Workload, and Teamwork. Ann Surg. 2015 Jun;261(6):1079-84. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001051.
PMID: 26291954BACKGROUNDHealey AN, Sevdalis N, Vincent CA. Measuring intra-operative interference from distraction and interruption observed in the operating theatre. Ergonomics. 2006 Apr 15-May 15;49(5-6):589-604. doi: 10.1080/00140130600568899.
PMID: 16717011BACKGROUNDEl-Jardali F, Lagace M. Making hospital care safer and better: the structure-process connection leading to adverse events. Healthc Q. 2005;8(2):40-8. doi: 10.12927/hcq..17048.
PMID: 15828566BACKGROUNDPalese A. Missed Nursing Care Entering Its Academic Maturity: A Call for Conceptual Renewal and Research Innovation. J Adv Nurs. 2026 Jul;82 Suppl 2:S180-S184. doi: 10.1111/jan.70517. Epub 2026 Jan 30. No abstract available.
PMID: 41618524BACKGROUNDLiu Q, Lu Y, Zhai S, Dai C, Kan C, Chen C. Workflow Interruptions, Perceived Workload and Missed Nursing: Their Impact on Nurses' Health Status-A Structural Equation Model. J Adv Nurs. 2026 Jan;82(1):311-320. doi: 10.1111/jan.16855. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
PMID: 39991959BACKGROUNDRostami K, Pourdel B, Hosseini SA, Rajabi E, Alizadeh A. Sleep quality, quality of work life, and missed perioperative nursing care among operating room technologists: a multicenter cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs. 2026 Jul 21. doi: 10.1186/s12912-026-05044-6. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 42477678BACKGROUNDGe W, Zhu T, Li M, Zhu X, Wang H. Missed nursing care in the operating room: a qualitative analysis of nurses' perspectives. BMC Nurs. 2026 Apr 21;25(1):503. doi: 10.1186/s12912-026-04672-2.
PMID: 42015199BACKGROUNDKalisch B, McLaughlin M, Marsh V, Nguyen L, Talsma A. The Development and Testing of the MISSCARE Survey OR. J Nurs Meas. 2021 Dec 1;29(3):541-555. doi: 10.1891/JNM-D-19-00039. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
PMID: 34518391BACKGROUNDGillespie BM, Harbeck E, Chaboyer W. The frequency and reasons for missed nursing care in Australian perioperative nurses: A national survey. J Clin Nurs. 2025 Mar;34(3):883-893. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17082. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
PMID: 38380764BACKGROUNDJones TL, Hamilton P, Murry N. Unfinished nursing care, missed care, and implicitly rationed care: State of the science review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Jun;52(6):1121-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.02.012. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
PMID: 25794946BACKGROUNDKalisch BJ, Landstrom GL, Hinshaw AS. Missed nursing care: a concept analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2009 Jul;65(7):1509-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05027.x. Epub 2009 May 9.
PMID: 19456994BACKGROUNDHart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human Mental Workload (pp. 139-183). North-Holland.
BACKGROUNDSonmez B, Oguz Z, Kutlu L, Yildirim A. Determination of nurses' mental workloads using subjective methods. J Clin Nurs. 2017 Feb;26(3-4):514-523. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13476. Epub 2016 Aug 15.
PMID: 27434614BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Burcu Demir Gokmen, PhD
Agri Ibrahim Cecen University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Volkan Gokmen, PhD
Agri Ibrahim Cecen University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 16, 2026
First Posted
September 22, 2026
Study Start
October 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Last Updated
September 24, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No plan to share individual participant data is currently in place. The dataset consists of de-identified, procedure-level observation and workload records without patient identifiers; data sharing beyond the study team is not currently planned given the small single-center sample and the observational nature of the data.