NCT07831954

Brief Summary

This multicenter, open-label, superiority randomized controlled trial will evaluate whether delaying planned induction from 40 weeks to 41 weeks improves delivery outcomes in women with A1 gestational diabetes mellitus (A1 GDM). The study is designed to enroll 1,500 eligible women (750 per group), all of whom are planned for vaginal delivery. Eligible participants are women aged 18-40 years with singleton pregnancy and who are primiparous. GDM will be diagnosed using OGTT at 24-28 weeks, and participants must meet criteria for A1 GDM, meaning blood glucose is controlled with diet and exercise only (no insulin or other glucose-lowering medications during pregnancy). After providing written informed consent, participants will be randomized 1:1 to one of two pre-specified induction strategies. Control group (planned induction at 40 weeks): Participants will have planned induction at 40+0 weeks (time window 39+6 to 40+0). If spontaneous labor occurs before or during the window, obstetric management will follow routine clinical practice. If labor has not started by the end of the window, induction will be performed according to the protocol. Intervention group (expectant management until 41 weeks): Participants will be managed expectantly until 41+0 weeks with planned induction in the 41+0 to 41+1 weeks window. If spontaneous labor occurs before or during the window, routine obstetric management will be used. If labor has not started by the end of the window, induction will be performed according to the protocol. Participants will be followed from randomization until delivery and hospital discharge, with selected outcomes followed up to postpartum day 42. The primary outcome is the cesarean delivery rate. Secondary outcomes include maternal outcomes such as postpartum hemorrhage and other obstetric complications, neonatal/perinatal outcomes including perinatal death, and need for respiratory support, as well as selected health-economic and patient-reported outcomes. All participating centers will apply standardized procedures for screening, monitoring, induction methods, and data collection. An independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) and a blinded Clinical Endpoint Committee will monitor safety and validate the primary outcome. The trial is expected to be completed within approximately 18 months after initiation of recruitment, and the results will provide high-quality evidence to inform timing of delivery for women with A1 GDM in China.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,500

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
27mo left

Started Oct 2026

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 14, 2026

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 21, 2026

Completed
10 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2026

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 30, 2028

Expected
8 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2028

Last Updated

September 22, 2026

Status Verified

August 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

September 14, 2026

Last Update Submit

September 19, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

A1 Gestational Diabetes MellitusTiming of DeliveryInduction of LaborExpectant ManagementRandomized Controlled Trial

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Cesarean delivery rate

    The proportion of randomized participants who undergo cesarean delivery from randomization until delivery, calculated as: number of participants undergoing cesarean delivery / number of randomized participants × 100%. Cesarean delivery includes elective cesarean delivery, intrapartum cesarean delivery, non-elective cesarean delivery before labor onset for medical indications, including emergency cesarean delivery, and other cesarean deliveries performed for medical indications. This outcome will be derived from the "mode of delivery" field in the case report form. Cesarean delivery indications include failed induction of labor, dystocia or abnormal labor progression, nonreassuring fetal status, and other medical indications, as specified in the case report form.

    From date of randomization until delivery, assessed up to 42 days postpartum

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Postpartum blood loss

    From delivery through 24 hours postpartum

  • Macrosomia rate

    At birth

  • Perinatal mortality

    From date of randomization until 28 days after birth

  • Neonatal respiratory support

    From date of birth until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 42 days postpartum

  • Other secondary maternal outcomes

    From date of randomization until 42 days postpartum, as applicable.

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Experimental Arm

EXPERIMENTAL

Pregnant women in this arm will receive expectant management until 41+0 weeks (time window: 41+0-41+1 weeks). Routine obstetric care will be provided if spontaneous labor occurs. Labor induction will be conducted for those without spontaneous labor.

Behavioral: Timing of Planned Delivery

Control Arm

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Pregnant women in this arm will receive planned labor induction at 40+0 weeks (time window: 39+6-40+0 weeks). Routine obstetric care will be provided if spontaneous labor occurs. Labor induction will be conducted for those without spontaneous labor.

Behavioral: Timing of Planned Delivery

Interventions

Assignment to a planned delivery timing strategy: induction of labor at 40+0 weeks (allowable window: 39+6 to 40+0 weeks) or expectant management until induction at 41+0 weeks (allowable window: 41+0 to 41+1 weeks), unless spontaneous labor occurs earlier; spontaneous labor is managed according to routine obstetric care.

Control ArmExperimental Arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 40 Years
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsParticipants' eligibility is based on biological sex because pregnancy and childbirth-related outcomes are assessed.
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Aged 18-40 years;
  • Singleton pregnancy;
  • Nulliparous;
  • Diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) by oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at 24-28 weeks of gestation;
  • At screening/enrollment, classified as A1 GDM, defined as good glycemic control after exercise counseling and nutritional management. Both of the following criteria must be met: (1) No use of insulin or other glucose-lowering medications during pregnancy up to screening/enrollment, verified through medication orders in the hospital information system (HIS); and (2) The clinician assesses overall glycemic control during pregnancy as meeting target and explicitly documents A1 GDM in the outpatient medical record.
  • Provides written informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Maternal factors: signs of labor; prelabor rupture of membranes; history of cesarean delivery or uterine surgery (e.g., myomectomy); clinically assessed pelvic contraction (e.g., pelvic outlet diameter ≤7.5 cm); cervical cerclage during the current pregnancy; planned cesarean delivery or any known contraindication to vaginal delivery; or severe pregnancy-related complications or comorbidities considered by the investigator to preclude tolerance of vaginal delivery, such as severe heart disease complicating pregnancy, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, psychiatric disorders/cognitive impairment, autoimmune diseases, or severe anemia.
  • Fetal factors: non-cephalic presentation; intrauterine fetal demise; fetal distress; fetal structural malformations or chromosomal abnormalities; fetal growth restriction (ultrasound-estimated fetal weight below the 10th percentile); or large-for-gestational-age fetus (ultrasound-estimated fetal weight above the 90th percentile).
  • Amniotic fluid factors: oligohydramnios, defined as an amniotic fluid index (AFI) ≤5 cm or a maximum vertical pocket (MVP) ≤2 cm; or polyhydramnios, defined as an AFI ≥25 cm or an MVP ≥8 cm.
  • Placental factors: placenta previa, placenta accreta spectrum, vasa previa, or similar conditions.
  • Medication-related contraindications: contraindications to induction agents such as misoprostol or oxytocin, including asthma, glaucoma, a scarred uterus, or drug allergy/hypersensitivity.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Peking University Third Hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100083, China

Location

Related Publications (15)

  • ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 190: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;131(2):e49-e64. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002501.

  • Simjak P, Krejci H, Hornova M, Mraz M, Parizek A, Krsek M, Haluzik M, Anderlova K. Establishing the Optimal Time for Induction of Labor in Women with Diet-Controlled Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Single-Center Observational Study. J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 29;11(21):6410. doi: 10.3390/jcm11216410.

  • Melamed N, Ray JG, Geary M, Bedard D, Yang C, Sprague A, Murray-Davis B, Barrett J, Berger H. Induction of labor before 40 weeks is associated with lower rate of cesarean delivery in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Mar;214(3):364.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.12.021.

  • Vitner D, Hiersch L, Ashwal E, Shmueli A, Yogev Y, Aviram A. Induction of labor versus expectant management for gestational diabetes mellitus at term. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019 Jul;300(1):79-86. doi: 10.1007/s00404-019-05171-3. Epub 2019 May 7.

  • Hong J, Atkinson J, Roddy Mitchell A, Tong S, Walker SP, Middleton A, Lindquist A, Hastie R. Comparison of Maternal Labor-Related Complications and Neonatal Outcomes Following Elective Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks of Gestation vs Expectant Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2313162. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.13162.

  • Papalia N, D'Souza RD, Hobson SR. Optimal timing of labour induction in contemporary clinical practice. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Mar;79:18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.002. Epub 2021 Dec 16.

  • Boulvain M, Senat MV, Perrotin F, Winer N, Beucher G, Subtil D, Bretelle F, Azria E, Hejaiej D, Vendittelli F, Capelle M, Langer B, Matis R, Connan L, Gillard P, Kirkpatrick C, Ceysens G, Faron G, Irion O, Rozenberg P; Groupe de Recherche en Obstetrique et Gynecologie (GROG). Induction of labour versus expectant management for large-for-date fetuses: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015 Jun 27;385(9987):2600-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61904-8. Epub 2015 Apr 8.

  • McElduff A, Cheung NW, McIntyre HD, Lagstrom JA, Oats JJ, Ross GP, Simmons D, Walters BN, Wein P; Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society. The Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society consensus guidelines for the management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes in relation to pregnancy. Med J Aust. 2005 Oct 3;183(7):373-7.

  • Kitzmiller JL, Block JM, Brown FM, Catalano PM, Conway DL, Coustan DR, Gunderson EP, Herman WH, Hoffman LD, Inturrisi M, Jovanovic LB, Kjos SI, Knopp RH, Montoro MN, Ogata ES, Paramsothy P, Reader DM, Rosenn BM, Thomas AM, Kirkman MS. Managing preexisting diabetes for pregnancy: summary of evidence and consensus recommendations for care. Diabetes Care. 2008 May;31(5):1060-79. doi: 10.2337/dc08-9020. No abstract available.

  • Hoffman L, Nolan C, Wilson JD, Oats JJ, Simmons D. Gestational diabetes mellitus--management guidelines. The Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society. Med J Aust. 1998 Jul 20;169(2):93-7. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1998.tb140192.x. No abstract available.

  • Greuter MJ, van Emmerik NM, Wouters MG, van Tulder MW. Quality of guidelines on the management of diabetes in pregnancy: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Jun 28;12:58. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-58.

  • ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists. Number 60, March 2005. Pregestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Mar;105(3):675-85. doi: 10.1097/00006250-200503000-00049. No abstract available.

  • Alejandro EU, Mamerto TP, Chung G, Villavieja A, Gaus NL, Morgan E, Pineda-Cortel MRB. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Harbinger of the Vicious Cycle of Diabetes. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Jul 15;21(14):5003. doi: 10.3390/ijms21145003.

  • Popova PV, Pustozerov EA, Tkachuk AS, Grineva EN. Improving nutrition for the prevention of gestational diabetes: Current status and perspectives. World J Diabetes. 2021 Sep 15;12(9):1494-1506. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v12.i9.1494.

  • Kautzky-Willer A, Winhofer Y, Kiss H, Falcone V, Berger A, Lechleitner M, Weitgasser R, Harreiter J. [Gestational diabetes mellitus (Update 2023)]. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2023 Jan;135(Suppl 1):115-128. doi: 10.1007/s00508-023-02181-9. Epub 2023 Apr 20. German.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetes, Gestational

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pregnancy ComplicationsFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesDiabetes MellitusGlucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System Diseases

Central Study Contacts

Yuan Wei, PhD, MD

CONTACT

Tianchen Wu, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 14, 2026

First Posted

September 21, 2026

Study Start

October 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Last Updated

September 22, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations