Erector Spinae Plane Block vs Retrolaminar Block for Analgesia After VATS
Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane Block and Retrolaminar Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
54
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study compared the postoperative analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block and retrolaminar block in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Adult patients were randomly assigned to receive either an ESP block or a retrolaminar block after induction of general anesthesia. Postoperative pain intensity was assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at predefined time points. Postoperative analgesic requirements and intraoperative opioid consumption were also evaluated.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable postoperative-pain
Started Apr 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable postoperative-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 14, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 21, 2026
CompletedSeptember 21, 2026
September 1, 2026
2 months
September 14, 2026
September 18, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Postoperative Pain Intensity Assessed Using the 11-Point Numeric Rating Scale
Postoperative pain intensity was assessed using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale, ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity and therefore a worse outcome. Pain scores were recorded at 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery.
1, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Postoperative Analgesic Requirement
Within the first 24 hours after surgery
Intraoperative Remifentanil Consumption
From induction of anesthesia until the end of surgery
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV)
Within the first 24 hours after surgery
Number of Block Attempts
During block performance procedure
Study Arms (2)
Erector Spinae Plane Block Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants assigned to this group received an ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block after induction of general anesthesia. The block was performed as part of the perioperative analgesia protocol for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.
Retrolaminar Block Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants assigned to this group received an ultrasound-guided retrolaminar block after induction of general anesthesia. The block was performed as part of the perioperative analgesia protocol for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.
Interventions
An ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block was performed after induction of general anesthesia. The block was administered as a regional analgesic technique in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.
An ultrasound-guided retrolaminar block was performed after induction of general anesthesia. The block was administered as a regional analgesic technique in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 18 and 81 years
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II
- Scheduled to undergo video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)
- Provided written informed consent to participate in the study
You may not qualify if:
- ASA physical status III or higher
- Decompensated organ failure
- Pregnancy
- Known allergy or hypersensitivity to local anesthetics
- Withdrawal of consent or request to discontinue participation in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Hacettepe Universitylead
- Gulhane Training and Research Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Gülhane Training and Research Hospital
Ankara, Eti̇mesgut, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The investigator responsible for postoperative pain assessment using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) was blinded to group allocation. The clinician responsible for determining the need for rescue analgesia was also unaware of the assigned block technique. The anesthesiologist performing the block was not blinded due to the nature of the intervention
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Anesthesiology and Reanimation Resident
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 14, 2026
First Posted
September 21, 2026
Study Start
April 1, 2023
Primary Completion
May 31, 2023
Study Completion
June 1, 2023
Last Updated
September 21, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share