Neurobiology of Pain in Burn Survivors
1 other identifier
interventional
92
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Many burn survivors experience persistent, disabling pain that is strongly influenced by pain catastrophizing, a pattern of negative cognitive and emotional responses to pain involving feelings of helplessness, rumination, and magnification of symptoms. The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate whether an 6-week, remotely delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy program reduces pain interference (disruption to daily life) and pain catastrophizing more effectively than an 6-week pain education. Researchers also aim to identify the neurobiological mechanisms through which non-pharmacologic pain management works using functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging brain scans.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2027
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 11, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 17, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2027
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2031
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2031
September 22, 2026
September 1, 2026
4.4 years
September 11, 2026
September 17, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
fMRI Measure
Participants will undergo functional MRI scan sessions, including resting-state fMRI and task-based BOLD fMRI. Task-based fMRI utilizes a block-design contrasting 6 Pain Catastrophizing Scale statements (covering helplessness, magnification, and rumination) against 6 lexically matched neutral control statements.
Baseline and 6 weeks (post-intervention).
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), and 24 weeks (follow-up).
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), and 24 weeks (follow-up)
Other Outcomes (5)
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29)
Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), and 24 weeks (follow-up).
Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) Battery
Baseline, and 6 weeks (post-intervention).
Coping Strategies Questionnaire
Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), and 24 weeks (follow-up)
- +2 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive an 6-week course of remotely delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy via secure video conferencing (1 weekly session, approximately 60 minutes each). The intervention focuses on a pain self-management paradigm, cognitive restructuring, and skill-building exercises (e.g., relaxation, thought-stopping, distraction) along with in-vivo and home practice to target and reduce maladaptive pain-related cognitions.
Pain Education
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants receive an 6-week course of remotely delivered Pain Education via secure video conferencing (1 weekly session, approximately 60 minutes each). Sessions cover general pain-related topics (e.g., Gate-Control Theory, acute vs. chronic pain, working with health care providers) without incorporating active coping skills training, handouts, or at-home practice.
Interventions
An 6-week, remotely delivered behavioral intervention administered weekly via secure video conferencing by a trained psychologist (approximately 60 minutes per session). It utilizes active, structured techniques (such as relaxation, thought-stopping, distraction, and cognitive restructuring) along with in-vivo and home practice to target and reduce maladaptive pain-related cognitions (i.e., pain catastrophizing).
An 6-week, remotely delivered educational control intervention administered weekly via secure video conferencing by a trained psychologist (approximately 60 minutes per session). Matched for therapist contact time with the Cognitive Behavioral Therapy group, sessions cover standard pain-related topics (e.g., Gate-Control Theory, types of chronic pain, working with healthcare providers) without active skill-building components, handouts, or at-home practice.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Previously hospitalized for burn injury
- Age 18 to 65 years
- Able to provide written informed consent and fluent in English
- Living in a community setting
- Six (6) months or more post-burn injury
- Burn-related pain rated as ≥4 (on a scale of 0-10) over the past week, co-localized with the site of the burn injury
You may not qualify if:
- Comorbid acute pain condition.
- Comorbid chronic pain condition that is rated by the participant as more painful than the burn injury pain.
- Living in an institution or medical facility.
- Pregnant or nursing.
- Any psychiatric condition precluding study participation, such as a disorder involving psychosis (e.g., schizophrenia), unmanaged bipolar disorder, or a severe personality disorder.
- History of anxiety disorders or significant anxiety symptoms interfering with imaging procedures (e.g., panic).
- Contraindication to MRI (e.g., implanted ferrous metal).
- History of significant head injury (e.g., with substantial loss of consciousness).
- Psychiatric hospitalization in the past 6 months.
- Currently participating in therapeutic clinical research trials.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (32)
MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Hoffman JM, West SG, Sheets V. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychol Methods. 2002 Mar;7(1):83-104. doi: 10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.83.
PMID: 11928892BACKGROUNDMcLaren DG, Ries ML, Xu G, Johnson SC. A generalized form of context-dependent psychophysiological interactions (gPPI): a comparison to standard approaches. Neuroimage. 2012 Jul 16;61(4):1277-86. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.068. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
PMID: 22484411BACKGROUNDGorgolewski KJ, Auer T, Calhoun VD, Craddock RC, Das S, Duff EP, Flandin G, Ghosh SS, Glatard T, Halchenko YO, Handwerker DA, Hanke M, Keator D, Li X, Michael Z, Maumet C, Nichols BN, Nichols TE, Pellman J, Poline JB, Rokem A, Schaefer G, Sochat V, Triplett W, Turner JA, Varoquaux G, Poldrack RA. The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments. Sci Data. 2016 Jun 21;3:160044. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.44.
PMID: 27326542BACKGROUNDLazaridou A, Kim J, Cahalan CM, Loggia ML, Franceschelli O, Berna C, Schur P, Napadow V, Edwards RR. Effects of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) on Brain Connectivity Supporting Catastrophizing in Fibromyalgia. Clin J Pain. 2017 Mar;33(3):215-221. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000422.
PMID: 27518491BACKGROUNDBen-David BM, van Lieshout PH, Leszcz T. A resource of validated affective and neutral sentences to assess identification of emotion in spoken language after a brain injury. Brain Inj. 2011;25(2):206-20. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2010.536197. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
PMID: 21117915BACKGROUNDPolianskis R, Graven-Nielsen T, Arendt-Nielsen L. Computer-controlled pneumatic pressure algometry--a new technique for quantitative sensory testing. Eur J Pain. 2001;5(3):267-77. doi: 10.1053/eujp.2001.0245.
PMID: 11558982BACKGROUNDPetersen KK, Kilic K, Hertel E, Sejersgaard-Jacobsen TH, Jorgensen MK, Troelsen A, Arendt-Nielsen L, Boye Larsen D. Quantitative sensory testing as an assessment tool to predict the response to standard pain treatment in knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain Rep. 2023 Jun 5;8(4):e1079. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001079. eCollection 2023 Jul-Aug.
PMID: 38699564BACKGROUNDGeorgopoulos V, Akin-Akinyosoye K, Zhang W, McWilliams DF, Hendrick P, Walsh DA. Quantitative sensory testing and predicting outcomes for musculoskeletal pain, disability, and negative affect: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain. 2019 Sep;160(9):1920-1932. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001590.
PMID: 31045746BACKGROUNDHarden RN, Weinland SR, Remble TA, Houle TT, Colio S, Steedman S, Kee WG; American Pain Society Physicians. Medication Quantification Scale Version III: update in medication classes and revised detriment weights by survey of American Pain Society Physicians. J Pain. 2005 Jun;6(6):364-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2005.01.350.
PMID: 15943958BACKGROUNDDevilly GJ, Borkovec TD. Psychometric properties of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2000 Jun;31(2):73-86. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7916(00)00012-4.
PMID: 11132119BACKGROUNDAndrusyna TP, Tang TZ, DeRubeis RJ, Luborsky L. The factor structure of the working alliance inventory in cognitive-behavioral therapy. J Psychother Pract Res. 2001 Summer;10(3):173-8.
PMID: 11402080BACKGROUNDDeyo RA, Katrina Ramsey, Buckley DI, Michaels L, Kobus A, Eckstrom E, Forro V, Morris C. Performance of a Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form in Older Adults with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain. Pain Med. 2016 Feb;17(2):314-24. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnv046.
PMID: 26814279BACKGROUNDRevicki DA, Chen WH, Harnam N, Cook KF, Amtmann D, Callahan LF, Jensen MP, Keefe FJ. Development and psychometric analysis of the PROMIS pain behavior item bank. Pain. 2009 Nov;146(1-2):158-69. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.07.029. Epub 2009 Aug 15.
PMID: 19683873BACKGROUNDYu L, Buysse DJ, Germain A, Moul DE, Stover A, Dodds NE, Johnston KL, Pilkonis PA. Development of short forms from the PROMIS sleep disturbance and Sleep-Related Impairment item banks. Behav Sleep Med. 2011 Dec 28;10(1):6-24. doi: 10.1080/15402002.2012.636266.
PMID: 22250775BACKGROUNDAnderson KO, Dowds BN, Pelletz RE, Edwards TW, Peeters-Asdourian C. Development and initial validation of a scale to measure self-efficacy beliefs in patients with chronic pain. Pain. 1995 Oct;63(1):77-83. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00021-J.
PMID: 8577493BACKGROUNDDworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Katz NP, Kerns RD, Stucki G, Allen RR, Bellamy N, Carr DB, Chandler J, Cowan P, Dionne R, Galer BS, Hertz S, Jadad AR, Kramer LD, Manning DC, Martin S, McCormick CG, McDermott MP, McGrath P, Quessy S, Rappaport BA, Robbins W, Robinson JP, Rothman M, Royal MA, Simon L, Stauffer JW, Stein W, Tollett J, Wernicke J, Witter J; IMMPACT. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2005 Jan;113(1-2):9-19. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.012. No abstract available.
PMID: 15621359BACKGROUNDTan G, Jensen MP, Thornby JI, Shanti BF. Validation of the Brief Pain Inventory for chronic nonmalignant pain. J Pain. 2004 Mar;5(2):133-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2003.12.005.
PMID: 15042521BACKGROUNDJensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM. Changes in beliefs, catastrophizing, and coping are associated with improvement in multidisciplinary pain treatment. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001 Aug;69(4):655-62. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.69.4.655.
PMID: 11550731BACKGROUNDBurns JW, Kubilus A, Bruehl S, Harden RN, Lofland K. Do changes in cognitive factors influence outcome following multidisciplinary treatment for chronic pain? A cross-lagged panel analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003 Feb;71(1):81-91. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.71.1.81.
PMID: 12602428BACKGROUNDEdwards RR, Haythornthwaite JA, Smith MT, Klick B, Katz JN. Catastrophizing and depressive symptoms as prospective predictors of outcomes following total knee replacement. Pain Res Manag. 2009 Jul-Aug;14(4):307-11. doi: 10.1155/2009/273783.
PMID: 19714271BACKGROUNDSevereijns R, van den Hout MA, Vlaeyen JW, Picavet HS. Pain catastrophizing and general health status in a large Dutch community sample. Pain. 2002 Sep;99(1-2):367-76. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00219-1.
PMID: 12237216BACKGROUNDOsman A, Barrios FX, Kopper BA, Hauptmann W, Jones J, O'Neill E. Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. J Behav Med. 1997 Dec;20(6):589-605. doi: 10.1023/a:1025570508954.
PMID: 9429990BACKGROUNDVan Loey NE, Klein-Konig I, de Jong AEE, Hofland HWC, Vandermeulen E, Engelhard IM. Catastrophizing, pain and traumatic stress symptoms following burns: A prospective study. Eur J Pain. 2018 Jul;22(6):1151-1159. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1203. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
PMID: 29436110BACKGROUNDRassu FS, Staguhn E, Ravyts S, Castillo R, Wiechman SA, Kirkhart T, Aaron RV, Acton A, Ware L, Milner SM, Price LA, Fauerbach JA, Haythornthwaite JA, Wegener ST. Efficacy of an online self-management program for chronic burn pain: A randomized controlled trial of the Take Charge of Burn Pain program. Burns. 2025 Mar;51(2):107336. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2024.107336. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
PMID: 39721239BACKGROUNDCukor J, Wyka K, Leahy N, Yurt R, Difede J. The treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder and related psychosocial consequences of burn injury: a pilot study. J Burn Care Res. 2015 Jan-Feb;36(1):184-92. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000177.
PMID: 25407385BACKGROUNDSeehausen A, Ripper S, Germann G, Hartmann B, Wind G, Renneberg B. Efficacy of a burn-specific cognitive-behavioral group training. Burns. 2015 Mar;41(2):308-16. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2014.07.006. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
PMID: 25300755BACKGROUNDLee J, Lazaridou A, Paschali M, Loggia ML, Berry MP, Ellingsen DM, Isenburg K, Anzolin A, Grahl A, Wasan AD, Napadow V, Edwards RR. A Randomized Controlled Neuroimaging Trial of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Fibromyalgia Pain. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024 Jan;76(1):130-140. doi: 10.1002/art.42672. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
PMID: 37727908BACKGROUNDBurns JW, Glenn B, Bruehl S, Harden RN, Lofland K. Cognitive factors influence outcome following multidisciplinary chronic pain treatment: a replication and extension of a cross-lagged panel analysis. Behav Res Ther. 2003 Oct;41(10):1163-82. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(03)00029-9.
PMID: 12971938BACKGROUNDHaythronthwaite JA, Lawrence JW, Fauerbach JA. Brief cognitive interventions for burn pain. Ann Behav Med. 2001 Winter;23(1):42-9. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2301_7.
PMID: 11302355BACKGROUNDEdwards RR, Cahalan C, Mensing G, Smith M, Haythornthwaite JA. Pain, catastrophizing, and depression in the rheumatic diseases. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2011 Apr;7(4):216-24. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2011.2. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
PMID: 21283147BACKGROUNDDauber A, Osgood PF, Breslau AJ, Vernon HL, Carr DB. Chronic persistent pain after severe burns: a survey of 358 burn survivors. Pain Med. 2002 Mar;3(1):6-17. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4637.2002.02004.x.
PMID: 15102213BACKGROUNDKim J, Loggia ML, Edwards RR, Wasan AD, Gollub RL, Napadow V. Sustained deep-tissue pain alters functional brain connectivity. Pain. 2013 Aug;154(8):1343-51. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.04.016. Epub 2013 Apr 11.
PMID: 23718988RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor, Harvard Medical School
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 11, 2026
First Posted
September 17, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
January 1, 2027
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2031
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2031
Last Updated
September 22, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
De-identified individual participant data may be shared with external research collaborators upon request, subject to an IRB-approved Data Use Agreement (DUA).