Pilot Study on the Effectiveness of Novel Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) Securement Dressing in Preventing PICC Dislodgement
1 other identifier
interventional
67
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Evidence regarding clinical effectiveness and acceptability of PICC sleeves remain limited. Few randomised controlled trials have evaluated PICC sleeves in routine hospital practice, and there is limited evidence regarding their feasibility, safety and influence on line condition. This pilot randomised controlled trial aims to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and user experience of a protective PICC sleeve among hospitalised patients with PICCs.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 21, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 10, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 25, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 2, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 14, 2026
CompletedSeptember 14, 2026
September 1, 2025
1.3 years
September 2, 2026
September 8, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Participant Recruitment Rate
Number of participants recruited over the recruitment period
16 months
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Intervention Adherence
From enrolment to 7 days after discharge or upon removal, whichever earlier.
Retention of Study Participants across 3 Time-points
From enrolment to 7 days after discharge or upon removal, whichever earlier.
Completeness of Data Collected
From enrolment to 7 days after discharge or upon removal, whichever earlier.
Number of Adverse Events
From enrolment to 7 days after discharge or upon removal, whichever earlier.
Patient-Reported Dislodgement Risk
From enrolment to 7 days after discharge or upon removal, whichever earlier.
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (8)
Number of Dislodgement Cases
From enrolment to 7 days after discharge or upon removal, whichever earlier.
Dressing Condition
From enrolment to 7 days after discharge or upon removal, whichever earlier.
CHG Gel Condition
From enrolment to 7 days after discharge or upon removal, whichever earlier.
- +5 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
The control group
NO INTERVENTIONThe control group used the standard securement dressing
The Treatment group
EXPERIMENTALThe treatment group received appropriately sized PICC sleeve cover in addition to standard device securement practices.
Interventions
The novel PICC sleeve cover would be applied on the intervention group in addition to standard PICC securement practices.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients receiving PICC placement for various medical conditions
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with known allergies to materials in the PICC sleeve
- Patients contraindicated for PICC placement
- Patients who are aggressive and/or restless
- Patients whose skin condition is unsuitable for CHG gel dressing application (e.g. skin with eczema plaques, bullous pemphigoid)
- Patients who have no mental capacity to give consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Changi General Hospital
Singapore, 529889, Singapore
Related Publications (9)
Karpanen T, Casey A, Whitehouse T, Nightingale P, Das I, Elliott TS. Abstracts from the 3rd International Conference on Prevention and Infection Control (ICPIC 2015). Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2015 Jun 16;4 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):I1-P308. doi: 10.1186/2047-2994-4-s1-i1. No abstract available.
PMID: 28256991BACKGROUNDChan RJ, Northfield S, Larsen E, Mihala G, Ullman A, Hancock P, Marsh N, Gavin N, Wyld D, Allworth A, Russell E, Choudhury MA, Flynn J, Rickard CM. Central venous Access device SeCurement And Dressing Effectiveness for peripherally inserted central catheters in adult acute hospital patients (CASCADE): a pilot randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2017 Oct 4;18(1):458. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2207-x.
PMID: 28978332BACKGROUNDDong H, Zhu Y, Zhang X, Yin X, Liu F. Chest CT tomography vs. intracavitary electrocardiogram guidance in predicting the length of PICC placement. BMC Surg. 2022 May 19;22(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01604-0.
PMID: 35590297BACKGROUNDGrau D, Clarivet B, Lotthe A, Bommart S, Parer S. Complications with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) used in hospitalized patients and outpatients: a prospective cohort study. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2017 Jan 28;6:18. doi: 10.1186/s13756-016-0161-0. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 28149507BACKGROUNDMoureau N, Lamperti M, Kelly LJ, Dawson R, Elbarbary M, van Boxtel AJ, Pittiruti M. Evidence-based consensus on the insertion of central venous access devices: definition of minimal requirements for training. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Mar;110(3):347-56. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes499. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
PMID: 23361124BACKGROUNDO'Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, Dellinger EP, Garland J, Heard SO, Lipsett PA, Masur H, Mermel LA, Pearson ML, Raad II, Randolph AG, Rupp ME, Saint S; Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) (Appendix 1). Summary of recommendations: Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-related Infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2011 May;52(9):1087-99. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir138. No abstract available.
PMID: 21467014BACKGROUNDYu K, Li J, Zhang D, Liu B, Wang K, Liu W, Shi Y, Zhao Y, Liu Y, Guo N, Sun W. Types of peripherally inserted central catheters and the risk of unplanned removals in patients: A prospective cohort study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 Jan;149:104621. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104621. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
PMID: 37922685BACKGROUNDXu B, Zhang J, Hou J, Ma M, Gong Z, Tang S. Nurses' Attitudes and Knowledge of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Maintenance in Primary Hospitals in China: A Cross-Sectional Survey. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020 Jul 28;13:903-913. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S250741. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32801965BACKGROUNDRickard CM, Marsh NM, Webster J, Gavin NC, Chan RJ, McCarthy AL, Mollee P, Ullman AJ, Kleidon T, Chopra V, Zhang L, McGrail MR, Larsen E, Choudhury MA, Keogh S, Alexandrou E, McMillan DJ, Mervin MC, Paterson DL, Cooke M, Ray-Barruel G, Castillo MI, Hallahan A, Corley A, Geoffrey Playford E. Peripherally InSerted CEntral catheter dressing and securement in patients with cancer: the PISCES trial. Protocol for a 2x2 factorial, superiority randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 15;7(6):e015291. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015291.
PMID: 28619777BACKGROUND
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 2, 2026
First Posted
September 14, 2026
Study Start
March 21, 2024
Primary Completion
July 10, 2025
Study Completion
September 25, 2025
Last Updated
September 14, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Legal/Regulatory: Data protection laws, consent limitations, institutional policies Commercial: Proprietary concerns, competitive advantage, patent issues Ethical: Privacy concerns, insufficient original consent, ethics approval scope