NCT07810686

Brief Summary

Prehospital providers interpret 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) under time pressure and without immediate expert support. Missed acute coronary occlusion - occlusion myocardial infarction (OMI) - delays reperfusion, while false positive interpretations trigger unnecessary catheterization laboratory activations. Multimodal large language models (LLMs) available on any smartphone can now analyze a photographed ECG, and prehospital providers have begun using them spontaneously. No randomized trial has evaluated whether this practice improves diagnostic performance. This randomized controlled trial compares the diagnostic performance of prehospital providers interpreting ECG clinical vignettes with and without mandatory assistance from a single, version-locked smartphone large language model. Participants - paramedics, emergency medical technicians, nurses and physicians practicing in prehospital care in French-speaking Switzerland - are randomized 1:1 on a dedicated digital platform and answer 14 clinical vignettes presented in individually randomized order. Each vignette is built around a real, anonymized 12-lead ECG obtained during routine clinical care. The primary outcome is the proportion of vignettes for which the participant correctly identifies the presence or absence of an OMI. Secondary outcomes are sensitivity, specificity, and the accuracy of the prehospital priority decision level.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
144

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
2mo left

Started Sep 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress36%
Sep 2026Nov 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 27, 2026

Completed
6 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 2, 2026

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 9, 2026

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 30, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 30, 2026

Last Updated

September 9, 2026

Status Verified

September 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

August 27, 2026

Last Update Submit

September 4, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

artificial intelligencelarge language modelGPT-4oelectrocardiographyocclusion myocardial infarctionOMIprehospital careparamedicsemergency medical servicesclinical decision supportdiagnostic accuracyclinical vignettesSwitzerlandFrench-speaking Switzerlandprehospital providers

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Proportion of vignettes with correct identification of occlusion myocardial infarction (OMI) status

    For each of the 14 vignettes, the participant answers a binary question: "At this stage of care, is an OMI (acute coronary occlusion) likely? Yes / No". Responses are scored against a reference standard defined a priori, vignette by vignette, by the study cardiologist and locked before data collection. This reference standard is the answer expected of a prehospital provider at the point of care, anchored on coronary angiography wherever angiography is discriminant. For non-ischaemic mimics the expected answer depends on whether the acute presentation allows the condition to be distinguished from a coronary occlusion: it does not for the Takotsubo case (expected answer "yes"), whereas acute pericarditis is usually recognisable (expected answer "no"). This pre-specified departure from a purely angiographic standard is reported as such, and the analysis is repeated in a sensitivity analysis classifying all mimics as non-OMI. The outcome is the proportion of correctly classified vignettes

    Single study session, approximately 90 minutes; 14 vignettes per participant

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Sensitivity of OMI detection

    Single study session, approximately 90 minutes

  • Specificity of OMI detection

    Single study session, approximately 90 minutes

  • Accuracy of the prehospital priority decision level

    Single study session, approximately 90 minutes

Other Outcomes (5)

  • Diagnostic accuracy on the closed-list diagnosis question

    Single study session, approximately 90 minutes

  • Self-reported confidence and calibration

    Single study session, approximately 90 minutes

  • Self-reported influence of the AI on the final answer

    Single study session, approximately 90 minutes

  • +2 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Control: unaided ECG interpretation

NO INTERVENTION

Participants interpret each of the 14 ECG vignettes without any assistance. Smartphones are turned face down and out of reach for the duration of the session. No intervention is administered.

AI-assisted ECG interpretation

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants must consult the study-imposed large language model for every vignette before submitting their answer. The platform locks the submit button until use of the tool is confirmed. Participants remain free not to follow the interpretation produced by the model and may base their final answer on their own clinical reasoning.

Diagnostic Test: Smartphone large language model assistance (GPT-4o, version-locked)

Interventions

The platform transmits the ECG image to a single large language model (OpenAI GPT-4o, API snapshot gpt-4o-2024-08-06), locked for the entire study, together with a standardised prompt identical for all participants and all vignettes: "I am on an urgent prehospital call with a patient who presents this ECG. Analyse it and tell me what you think." Participants cannot modify the prompt, ask follow-up questions or provide additional clinical context. The model version and system fingerprint returned by the API are recorded for every call. The model's interpretation is displayed within the vignette. Use of the tool is mandatory; adherence to its interpretation is not.

Also known as: ChatGPT, gpt-4o-2024-08-06
AI-assisted ECG interpretation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Prehospital care provider practising in French-speaking Switzerland
  • Any level of training: emergency medical technician, paramedic (ES), nurse (ES/HES) in prehospital emergency care, or prehospital emergency physician
  • Electronic informed consent signed before randomization

You may not qualify if:

  • Cardiologist
  • Any person not practising in prehospital care
  • Insufficient command of written French to answer the vignettes reliably
  • Refusal to participate or withdrawal of consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Caserne des pompiers de Morat (Swiss French-speaking prehospital clinical research conference)

Murten/Morat, Canton of Fribourg, 3280, Switzerland

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Acute Coronary SyndromeST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionNon-ST Elevated Myocardial InfarctionMyocardial Infarction

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Myocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesVascular DiseasesInfarctionIschemiaPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNecrosis

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Participants and investigators cannot be masked to allocation, since participants in the intervention arm knowingly use the AI tool. The statistician conducting the primary analysis is masked: groups are coded "Group 1" and "Group 2", and the allocation key is held solely by the principal investigator and released only after database lock and approval of the statistical analysis plan.
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Two parallel groups of prehospital providers, randomized 1:1 at the individual level. Each participant completes a single session comprising 14 ECG clinical vignettes presented in an individually randomized order. The control group interprets the ECGs unaided; the intervention group must consult a study-imposed smartphone large language model for every vignette before submitting an answer.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Maître-adjoint (Lecturer and Deputy Head of School), Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 27, 2026

First Posted

September 9, 2026

Study Start

September 2, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2026

Last Updated

September 9, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Fully anonymised individual participant data - responses to all vignettes, demographic variables and platform-generated technical variables - will be deposited in an open repository (Zenodo or OSF) at the time of publication, in accordance with FAIR principles. The ECG tracings themselves are excluded from this deposit: they originate from routine clinical care at the Geneva University Hospitals, which authorise their use for this study only and do not permit transmission to third parties. Requests concerning the tracings must be addressed to the Geneva University Hospitals.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
From the date of publication, with no end date.
Access Criteria
Open access, no restriction, no request procedure.

Locations