NCT07805889

Brief Summary

Facelift surgery repositions facial soft tissues but does not by itself restore all age-related volume loss. Autologous macrofat can be placed during the same operation to restore volume, yet the amount of grafted tissue that remains and the way the facial subcutaneous layer remodels are not routinely quantified. This study will prospectively standardize injected-volume recording and ultrasound mapping of predefined facial zones. A one-month scan, obtained after the early postoperative period, will serve as the imaging reference for the grafted tissue compartment, and a one-year scan will quantify persistent volume and tissue remodeling.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
400

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
5mo left

Started Jan 2023

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress90%
Jan 2023Mar 2027

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2023

Completed
3.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 1, 2026

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 8, 2026

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 10, 2026

Expected
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2027

Last Updated

September 8, 2026

Status Verified

September 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3.9 years

First QC Date

September 1, 2026

Last Update Submit

September 1, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

faceliftfat graftingultrasoundoutcomespatient satisfaction

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Percentage Retention of Ultrasound-Derived Facial Graft Volume

    For each predefined facial zone, ultrasound-derived grafted-tissue volume at 12 months will be divided by the corresponding volume at postoperative month 1 and multiplied by 100. A participant-level weighted mean will be calculated using the month-1 zone volumes as weights. Higher percentages indicate greater volume persistence.

    Postoperative month 1 and postoperative month 12.

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Ultrasound-Defined Subcutaneous Tissue Remodeling Score

    Baseline, postoperative month 1, and postoperative month 12.

  • Incidence of Fat-Grafting-Related Complications

    From surgery through postoperative month 12.

  • Change in FACE-Q Facial Appearance Score

    Baseline and postoperative month 12.

Interventions

Facelift surgery is performed using the surgeon's standardized technique. Harvested autologous fat is processed as macrofat and injected into predefined facial zones. The injected volume, cannula size, plane, number of passes, and volume per zone will be recorded

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Adults undergoing elective facelift surgery for facial aging in whom autologous facial macrofat grafting is planned as part of the operative protocol.

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18 to 65 years.
  • Scheduled for elective facelift surgery with facial autologous macrofat grafting specified before enrollment.
  • Ability to undergo standardized facial ultrasound at baseline, postoperative month 1, and postoperative month 12.
  • Capacity to provide written informed consent and comply with follow-up visits.

You may not qualify if:

  • Prior facial fat grafting within 24 months before enrollment.
  • Active facial infection, uncontrolled inflammatory skin disease, or open facial wound.
  • Known lipodystrophy or systemic disease expected to substantially alter facial fat distribution during follow-up.
  • Planned major weight-loss intervention or anticipated body-weight change greater than 10% during follow-up.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding at enrollment.
  • Inability to obtain technically adequate baseline ultrasound measurements in the predefined facial zones.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

NS Plastic surgery

Barranquilla, Colombia

RECRUITING

Related Publications (8)

  • Dhooghe NS, Maes S, Depypere B, Claes KEY, Coopman R, Kubat B, Piette MH, Monstrey S. Fat Embolism After Autologous Facial Fat Grafting. Aesthet Surg J. 2022 Feb 15;42(3):231-238. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjab252.

    PMID: 34133713BACKGROUND
  • Jerliu A, Watters A, Harrison L, Hughes CD, Babigian A, Castiglione C. Fat Necrosis After Facial Autologous Fat Grafting: A Systematic Review of Reported Complications and Management Strategies. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2026 Jul 9. doi: 10.1007/s00266-026-06047-z. Online ahead of print.

    PMID: 42423965BACKGROUND
  • Kaur S, Rubin JP, Gusenoff J, Sommers CA, Shamsunder MG, Hume KM, Mehrara BJ. The General Registry of Autologous Fat Transfer: Concept, Design, and Analysis of Fat Grafting Complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Jun 1;149(6):1118e-1129e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009162. Epub 2022 Apr 11.

    PMID: 35404336BACKGROUND
  • Schiraldi L, Sapino G, Meuli J, Maruccia M, Cherubino M, Raffoul W, di Summa PG. Facial Fat Grafting (FFG): Worth the Risk? A Systematic Review of Complications and Critical Appraisal. J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 11;11(16):4708. doi: 10.3390/jcm11164708.

    PMID: 36012947BACKGROUND
  • van Dongen JA, Langeveld M, van de Lande LS, Harmsen MC, Stevens HP, van der Lei B. The Effects of Facial Lipografting on Skin Quality: A Systematic Review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Nov;144(5):784e-797e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006147.

    PMID: 31688753BACKGROUND
  • Ma X, Huang J, Long X, Wang X. Quantifying outcomes of autologous fat transplantation in different facial deformities: A systemic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023 Dec;87:117-130. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.09.007. Epub 2023 Sep 12.

    PMID: 37837945BACKGROUND
  • Strong AL, Rohrich RJ, Tonnard PL, Vargo JD, Cederna PS. Technical Precision with Autologous Fat Grafting for Facial Rejuvenation: A Review of the Evolving Science. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Feb 1;153(2):360-377. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010643. Epub 2023 May 9.

    PMID: 37159906BACKGROUND
  • Xiong S, Yi C, Pu LLQ. An Overview of Principles and New Techniques for Facial Fat Grafting. Clin Plast Surg. 2020 Jan;47(1):7-17. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2019.08.001. Epub 2019 Oct 21.

    PMID: 31739899BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Patient Satisfaction

Interventions

Rhytidoplasty

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Treatment Adherence and ComplianceHealth BehaviorBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cosmetic TechniquesTherapeuticsDermatologic Surgical ProceduresPlastic Surgery ProceduresSurgical Procedures, Operative

Study Officials

  • NORA STANFORD, MD, plastic surgery

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Nora Stanford, MD, Plastic surgeon

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
1 Year
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 1, 2026

First Posted

September 8, 2026

Study Start

January 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 10, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Last Updated

September 8, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

It is a research just leaded by one surgeon, and er are not interested to do it with otherones

Locations