Comparative Effects of Pelvic PNF and HVLA Thrust in Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
HVLA in SIJD
1 other identifier
interventional
62
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study, titled "Comparative Effects of Pelvic PNF and HVLA Thrust on Pain, Mobility, and Flexibility in Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction," is a single-blinded randomized clinical trial (RCT) designed to evaluate and compare the therapeutic efficacy of two widely used but never directly compared manual therapy interventions Pelvic Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) and High-Velocity Low-Amplitude (HVLA) thrust manipulation in individuals diagnosed with sacroiliac joint dysfunction (SIJD), a musculoskeletal condition responsible for a substantial proportion of low back pain cases worldwide yet frequently under-recognized and inconsistently managed in clinical practice. The trial will enroll a total of 62 participants, aged between 18 and 40 years, recruited from the rehabilitation departments of two collaborating institutions in Karachi, Pakistan Creek General Hospital and Dr. Ziauddin Hospital with the sample size derived through G\*Power software at a 95% confidence interval and 80% statistical power, based on a reference study, and inflated by 20% to account for anticipated attrition. Eligible participants will be clinically diagnosed with SIJD by an orthopedic surgeon using a cluster of provocation and motion palpation tests, and must present with a baseline pain intensity greater than 4/10 cm on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) persisting for more than four weeks, while individuals who are pregnant or postpartum, report pain exceeding 8/10 cm on VAS, have diagnosed disc herniation, spinal stenosis, piriformis syndrome, true leg length discrepancy, recent spinal or lower-limb surgery, recent spinal injections or SIJ manual therapy, or active infection, malignancy, or uncontrolled hypertension will be excluded. Following informed written consent, participants will be randomly allocated through a sealed-envelope simple randomization technique into two equal groups of 31: Group A receiving Pelvic PNF, involving diagonal pelvic patterns such as anterior depression and posterior elevation combined with Rhythmic Stabilization and Contract-Relax Stretch techniques, and Group B receiving HVLA thrust manipulation, a controlled high-velocity, low-amplitude manual force applied directly to the sacroiliac joint. Baseline assessments, including demographic data (age, gender, height, weight, BMI, dominant and affected side) and outcome measures, will be conducted by a blinded, trained physiotherapist-assessor to minimize observer bias, with the three primary outcomespain intensity (via VAS), lumbo-pelvic mobility (via the Modified-Modified Schober Test), and posterior-chain flexibility (via the Sit and Reach Test) evaluated at three time points: baseline, six weeks post-intervention, and a twelve-week follow-up to determine the sustainability of treatment effects. The overall trial duration is set at six months following synopsis approval, and data will be analyzed statistically to test the null hypothesis (that HVLA is superior to Pelvic PNF) against the alternative hypothesis (that Pelvic PNF is superior to HVLA). Ethically, the study will proceed only after formal institutional approval, with all participants providing voluntary informed consent after receiving a Patient Information Sheet and adequate time for consideration, ensuring compliance with standard human-subject research protections. By generating the first direct, objectively measured comparison between these two conservative, non-pharmacological interventions, this trial aims to fill a clearly identified gap in the physiotherapy literature and provide clinicians with evidence-based guidance for selecting the more effective treatment approach in managing sacroiliac joint dysfunction, thereby improving conservative care pathways and clinical decision-making in orthopedic and physiotherapy practice.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 4, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 15, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 15, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 15, 2027
September 10, 2026
July 1, 2026
1 month
September 1, 2026
September 7, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (9)
Pain
Pain will be assess using Visual Analog Scale among individuals with SIJD, a 0-10 rating scale. where "0" indicates "no pain" and "10" indicates "worst pain".
Baseline.
Pain
Pain will be assess using Visual Analog Scale among individuals with SIJD, a 0-10 rating scale. where "0" indicates "no pain" and "10" indicates "worst pain".
6 weeks
Pain
Pain will be assess using Visual Analog Scale among individuals with SIJD, a 0-10 rating scale. where "0" indicates "no pain" and "10" indicates "worst pain".
at 12 weeks
Mobility
Mobility will be assess using Modified-Modified Schober Test among individuals with SIJD
Baseline
Mobility
Mobility will be assess using Modified-Modified Schober Test among individuals with SIJD
6 weeks
Mobility
Mobility will be assess using Modified-Modified Schober Test among individuals with SIJD
12 weeks
Flexibility
Flexibility will be assess using the Sit to Reach Test among individuals with SIJD
Baseline
Flexibility
Flexibility will be assess using the Sit to Reach Test among individuals with SIJD
6 weeks
Flexibility
Flexibility will be assess using the Sit to Reach Test among individuals with SIJD
12 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Pelvic PNF
EXPERIMENTALAnterior depression with rhythmic stabilization + posterior elevation with contract-relax stretch (side-lying position), preceded by a hot pack, plus the same SIJ exercises. Dosage: 3 sets × 10-12 reps, 60-sec rest between sets, Frequency: 3 sessions/week, 45 min each, Duration: 6 weeks
HVLA thrust
EXPERIMENTALSingle high-velocity low-amplitude thrust manipulation to the SI joint (supine position), preceded by a 10-min hot pack, plus SIJ exercises (Bridging, Cat-Camel, Piriformis, lumbar stretching, hip isometrics). Dosage: 1 thrust/session, Frequency: 3 sessions/week, 45 min each, Duration: 6 weeks
Interventions
Anterior depression with rhythmic stabilization + posterior elevation with contract-relax stretch (side-lying position), preceded by a hot pack, plus the same SIJ exercises. Dosage: 3 sets × 10-12 reps, 60-sec rest between sets, Frequency: 3 sessions/week, 45 min each, Duration: 6 weeks
Single high-velocity low-amplitude thrust manipulation to the SI joint (supine position), preceded by a 10-min hot pack, plus SIJ exercises (Bridging, Cat-Camel, Piriformis, lumbar stretching, hip isometrics). Dosage: 1 thrust/session, Frequency: 3 sessions/week, 45 min each, Duration: 6 weeks
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinically diagnosed participants with SIJD, referred by Orthopedics through five provocation and motion palpation test with age between 18 to 40 years.
- Baseline Pain \> 4/10cm on VAS.
- Pain Duration \> 4weeks.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy and postpartum females.
- Pain score \>8/10cm on VAS.
- Diagnosed cases of acute disc hernia and spinal stenosis that may cause pain in the lower back and hips, piriformis syndrome.
- True Leg Length Discrepancy or other structural deformities.
- Recent spinal/hip joint/lower limb Surgery \< 3 months..
- Received Spinal Injections or Manual therapy for the sacroiliac joint \< 3months.
- Diagnosed with Active Infection. Malignancy, metabolic disease, uncontrolled hypertension.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (10)
Cohen SP, Chen Y, Neufeld NJ. Sacroiliac joint pain: a comprehensive review of epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment. Expert Rev Neurother. 2013 Jan;13(1):99-116. doi: 10.1586/ern.12.148.
PMID: 23253394RESULTCastro-Sanchez AM, Gil-Martinez E, Fernandez-Sanchez M, Lara-Palomo IC, Nastasia I, de Los Angeles Querol-Zaldivar M, Aguilar-Ferrandiz ME. Manipulative therapy of sacral torsion versus myofascial release in patients clinically diagnosed posterior pelvic pain: a consort compliant randomized controlled trial. Spine J. 2021 Nov;21(11):1890-1899. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.05.002. Epub 2021 May 13.
PMID: 33991702RESULTBuchanan P, Vodapally S, Lee DW, Hagedorn JM, Bovinet C, Strand N, Sayed D, Deer T. Successful Diagnosis of Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction. J Pain Res. 2021 Oct 8;14:3135-3143. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S327351. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34675642RESULTTrager RJ, Baumann AN, Rogers H, Tidd J, Orellana K, Preston G, Baldwin K. Efficacy of manual therapy for sacroiliac joint pain syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Man Manip Ther. 2024 Dec;32(6):561-572. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2024.2316420. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
PMID: 38353102RESULTAmjad F, Mohseni Bandpei MA, Gilani SA, Arooj A. Reliability of modified-modified Schober's test for the assessment of lumbar range of motion. J Pak Med Assoc. 2022 Sep;72(9):1755-1759. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.4071.
PMID: 36280970RESULTAlqhtani RS, Ahmed H, Alshahrani A, Alyami AM, Khan AR, Khan A. Synergistic Benefits of Motor Control Exercises and Balance Training in Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Life (Basel). 2023 Nov 27;13(12):2258. doi: 10.3390/life13122258.
PMID: 38137859RESULTAbdollahi S, Sheikhhoseini R, Rahimi M, Huddleston WE. The sacroiliac dysfunction and pain is associated with history of lower extremity sport related injuries. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2023 Mar 20;15(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13102-023-00648-w.
PMID: 36941717RESULTAgarwal S, Bedekar N, Shyam A, Sancheti P. Comparison between effects of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization and manual myofascial release on pain, range of motion and function in myofascial pain syndrome of upper trapezius - A randomized controlled trial. Hong Kong Physiother J. 2024 Jun;44(1):57-67. doi: 10.1142/S1013702524500069. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
PMID: 38577397RESULTJavadov A, Ketenci A, Aksoy C. The Efficiency of Manual Therapy and Sacroiliac and Lumbar Exercises in Patients with Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction Syndrome. Pain Physician. 2021 May;24(3):223-233.
PMID: 33988941RESULTBeyazit S, Kimyon G, Karazincir S. Assessment of Anatomical Variations in the Sacroiliac Joint Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Retrospective Study of 840 Patients. Diagnostics (Basel). 2026 Mar 28;16(7):1020. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics16071020.
PMID: 41975733RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The outcome assessor will be blinded regarding group assignment.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 1, 2026
First Posted
September 4, 2026
Study Start
September 15, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 15, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 15, 2027
Last Updated
September 10, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share