NCT07798765

Brief Summary

This study compared SRP alone and SRP combined with LANAP in 120 patients with chronic periodontitis. Clinical outcomes and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) were assessed before and 12 weeks after treatment. The study aimed to determine how these treatments affect both periodontal health and patients' quality of life.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
120

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 13, 2024

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 30, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2025

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 26, 2026

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 1, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

September 1, 2026

Status Verified

August 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

August 26, 2026

Last Update Submit

August 29, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

LANAPLASEROHRQoLperiodontal disease

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • gingival index

    Gingival index scores each site on a 0 to 3 scale, with 0 being normal and 3 being severe inflammation. Clinical examination was performed on the six index teeth. Each of the four surfaces of the teeth (buccal, lingual, mesial and distal) is given a score from 0-3. The scores from the four areas of the tooth were added and divided by four in order to give the GI for the tooth. Finally, by adding the scores for the teeth and dividing by the number of teeth examined, the GI for the individual was obtained

    From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks

  • plaque index

    Plaque index was calculated as the percentage of teeth with visible plaque on any surface of the tooth. For this, clinical examination was performed on the six index teeth. Each of the four surfaces of the teeth (buccal, lingual, mesial and distal) is given a score from 0-3. The scores from the four areas of the tooth were added and divided by four in order to give the plaque index for the tooth. Plaque index for the individual was obtained by adding the scores for the teeth and dividing by the number of teeth examined

    From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks

  • periodontal pocket depth

    periodontal pocket depth is the distance between the base of the pocket and gingival margin, measured with a periodontal probe (UNC-15) inserted parallel to the vertical axis of tooth. The measurements were made at four sites per tooth \[mesial, buccal, distal and palatal/lingual\] for all teeth, excluding third molar.

    From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks

  • clinical attachment level

    clinical attachment level is the distance between the base of the pocket and a fixed point on crown such as cementoenamel junction. This was assessed using UNC-15 probe from the cementoenamel junction to the base of the pocket at 4 sites \[mesial, buccal, distal and palatal/lingual\].

    From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • OHIP 14

    From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks

Study Arms (2)

scaling and root planning only

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

participants in comparator group only received scaling and root planning treatment

Procedure: Scaling and root planing plus placebo

scaling and root planning along with laser assisted new attachment procedure

EXPERIMENTAL

test group received scaling and root planning along with laser assisted new attachment procedure

Procedure: SRP with laser assisted new attachment procedure

Interventions

SRP with laser assisted new attachment procedure along with implementation of OHIP 14 to assess oral health related quality of life

Also known as: SRP + LANAP
scaling and root planning along with laser assisted new attachment procedure

participants received scaling and root planning with implementation of OHIP 14

Also known as: SRP
scaling and root planning only

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with at least \>18 teeth.
  • Patients with periodontal pocket depth (PPD) ≥4mm or having ≥3mm clinical attachment loss on at least one of the four surfaces examined.
  • Patients with gingival recession defects.
  • Patients without occlusal problems or who have received an occlusal correction.
  • Patients with no history of periodontal treatment in the last 12 months.
  • Patients who are willing to fill out a questionnaire before and after NSPT.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with cognitive disorders were unable to answer or interpret the questions.
  • Pregnant or lactating women.
  • Patients with systemic diseases, including immunosuppression, cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, and blood disorders.
  • Patients who took antibiotics or immunosuppressants within the last 6 months.
  • Patients with acute illnesses and/or active intraoral lesions.
  • Patient having teeth with grade III mobility.
  • Patients who were chronic smokers or alcoholics.
  • Patients with gingival enlargement or pseudo pockets.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Periodontics

Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, 171001, India

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Periodontal Diseases

Interventions

Tooth ExfoliationRoot Planing

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Mouth DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Dental Physiological PhenomenaDigestive System and Oral Physiological PhenomenaDental ScalingDental ProphylaxisPeriodonticsDentistrySubgingival CurettagePreventive Dentistry

Study Officials

  • Ajay Mahajan, MDS

    HP GDC SHIMLA

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Model Details: This study compared SRP alone with SRP + LANAP in patients with chronic periodontitis.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Dr. Mahenigar, Junior Resident Periodontics

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 26, 2026

First Posted

September 1, 2026

Study Start

February 13, 2024

Primary Completion

January 30, 2025

Study Completion

April 30, 2025

Last Updated

September 1, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Only the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) that directly support the results reported in this publication will be considered for sharing. IPD not related to the published analyses will not be included. Data sharing may be limited because the study dataset contains sensitive participant-level clinical and demographic information, and complete sharing could potentially compromise participant privacy and confidentiality, particularly when combined with other available information. Therefore, any sharing of IPD will be subject to appropriate ethical considerations, institutional approval, and applicable informed-consent and data-protection requirements.

Locations