Pelvic Floor Ultrasound Before Induction of Labour and Labour Outcome
LEVATOR-IOL
Antepartum Three-Dimensional Transperineal Ultrasound Assessment of the Levator Hiatus and Labour Outcome in Women Undergoing Induction of Labour: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study
1 other identifier
observational
140
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pregnancy and vaginal birth are the main causes of pelvic floor disorders such as urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. The levator hiatus - the opening in the pelvic floor muscles through which the baby passes - can be measured on three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound at rest, during pelvic floor contraction and during a Valsalva manoeuvre. Its size and its ability to stretch have been related to how long labour lasts and to how the baby is eventually born, but the evidence comes mostly from women in spontaneous labour, in whom the exact time labour began cannot be established. Women having their labour induced offer a better model, because the time each stage of labour begins is documented. Recently, automated software has made the measurement of the levator hiatus fast and reproducible, which makes it realistic to use in everyday practice. This prospective observational study will enrol 140 women with a singleton pregnancy at 36 weeks or more who are scheduled for induction of labour. Before induction begins, each woman will have a transperineal ultrasound scan of the pelvic floor at rest, on maximum contraction and on maximum Valsalva. The scan does not involve any vaginal probe, radiation or injection, and takes about 15 minutes. The times of each phase of labour, the way the baby is born and the condition of the perineum after birth will be recorded prospectively from the clinical record. The scan will be repeated before hospital discharge and about one month after birth, together with validated pelvic floor symptom questionnaires. The main question is whether the area of the levator hiatus measured on Valsalva before induction is related to the duration of the active, pushing phase of the second stage of labour. The study will also examine the duration of the first stage, the mode of delivery, and how the pelvic floor changes in the first month after an induced birth. Study procedures do not influence clinical care in any way: induction and labour are managed according to standard departmental protocols, and the research ultrasound results are not disclosed to the clinical team.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Oct 2026
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 27, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2028
September 3, 2026
August 1, 2026
2 years
August 27, 2026
September 2, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Duration of the active (pushing) second stage of labour
Time elapsed from the onset of active maternal pushing to delivery of the fetus, recorded in minutes from the clinical record, analysed in relation to the levator hiatal area measured on maximum Valsalva before induction
From the onset of active pushing to delivery, assessed up to 4 hours
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Duration of the active phase of the first stage of labour
From the onset of the active phase to full dilatation, assessed up to 24 hours.
Duration of the passive second stage of labour
From full dilatation to the onset of pushing, assessed up to 4 hours.
Induction-to-delivery interval
From the start of induction to delivery, assessed up to 96 hours.
Mode of delivery a
at delivery
Change in levator hiatal area on Valsalva from before induction to hospital discharge
Before induction (36 weeks of gestation or later) and 24 to 96 hours after delivery
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of automated levator hiatal area measurement
Before induction, with manual analysis performed at least 2 weeks after automated analysis.
Study Arms (1)
Women undergoing induction of labour
Women with a singleton cephalic pregnancy at 36 weeks of gestation or more, admitted for induction of labour with the intention of vaginal birth, assessed by three-dimensional transperineal pelvic floor ultrasound before induction, before hospital discharge and one month after delivery.
Interventions
Transperineal acquisition of 3D/4D pelvic floor volumes at rest, on maximum pelvic floor contraction and on maximum Valsalva manoeuvre, using a transabdominal volumetric probe applied translabially with the woman in the lithotomy position and an empty bladder. Levator hiatal area and diameters are measured offline on the plane of minimal hiatal dimensions using automated segmentation software, with manual tracing as a quality control. No vaginal or rectal probe is used and no ionising radiation is involved. - Other names: TPUS; pelvic floor ultrasound
Eligibility Criteria
Consecutive women with a singleton cephalic pregnancy at 36 weeks of gestation or more admitted to the induction of labour service of a tertiary maternity unit, with the intention of vaginal birth, who consent to research pelvic floor ultrasound before the start of cervical ripening.
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 years or older
- Singleton pregnancy with cephalic presentation
- Gestational age of 36 weeks 0 days or more, dated by first-trimester crown-rump length
- Scheduled for induction of labour with a planned attempt at vaginal delivery, for any clinical indication
- Ultrasound assessment feasible before administration of the first cervical ripening agent
You may not qualify if:
- Known fetal structural or chromosomal anomaly
- Previous caesarean section or previous uterine surgery
- Planned caesarean section or a contraindication to vaginal delivery arising before the ultrasound assessment
- Connective tissue disease, neuropathy or neuromuscular disease affecting the pelvic floor
- Previous pelvic floor or anti-incontinence surgery - Active labour, or ruptured membranes with regular contractions, at the time of the scheduled assessment
- Inability to perform an adequate Valsalva manoeuvre or pelvic floor contraction after standardised instruction
- Inability to provide informed consent or to understand the study questionnaires
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico Umberto I, Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences
Roma, RM, 00161, Italy
Related Publications (5)
Dietz HP, Shek C, Clarke B. Biometry of the pubovisceral muscle and levator hiatus by three-dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jun;25(6):580-5. doi: 10.1002/uog.1899.
PMID: 15883982RESULTIshii K, Futaki S, Uchiyama H, Nagasawa K, Andoh T. Mechanism of inhibition of mammalian DNA topoisomerase I by heparin. Biochem J. 1987 Jan 1;241(1):111-9. doi: 10.1042/bj2410111.
PMID: 3032152RESULTBrunelli E, Del Prete B, Casadio P, Pilu G, Youssef A. The dynamic change of the anteroposterior diameter of the levator hiatus under Valsalva maneuver at term and labor outcome. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020 Nov;39(8):2353-2360. doi: 10.1002/nau.24494. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
PMID: 32865824RESULTYoussef A, Brunelli E, Pilu G, Dietz HP. The maternal pelvic floor and labor outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Nov;3(6S):100452. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100452. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
PMID: 34365028RESULTResta S, De Vito M, Patelli C, Lu JLA, Gabrielli G, Chiodo E, Mappa I, Rizzo G. Validation of an automated software (Smartpelvic) in assessing hiatal area from three dimensional transperineal pelvic volumes of pregnant women: comparison with manual analysis. J Perinat Med. 2023 Nov 9;52(2):165-170. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2023-0323. Print 2024 Feb 26.
PMID: 37938105RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Giuseppe Rizzo
Università Roma Sapienza
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 27, 2026
First Posted
September 1, 2026
Study Start
October 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2028
Last Updated
September 3, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- Beginning 12 months and ending 5 years after publication of the primary results
- Access Criteria
- Requests should be directed to the principal investigator and will require a signed data access agreement and evidence of ethics approval for the proposed secondary analysis.
De-identified individual participant data underlying published results, together with the data dictionary, will be made available to investigators whose proposed use has been approved by an independent review committee