NCT07796321

Brief Summary

The goal of this trial is to learn if one mode of mechanical ventilation (i.e. machine to help with breathing) is better than another in children who need help from a machine to breathe. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • How hard do children need to work to breathe when they are using different types of modes of mechanical ventilation?
  • Evaluate which mode of mechanical ventilation performs better when the patient is clinically awake enough to start breaths

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
25

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
18mo left

Started Sep 2026

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress2%
Sep 2026Mar 2028

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 27, 2026

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 1, 2026

Completed
20 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 21, 2026

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2028

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2028

Last Updated

September 1, 2026

Status Verified

August 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

August 27, 2026

Last Update Submit

August 27, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Mechanical ventilationPaediatricsSynchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV)Pressure control ventilation (PCV)Pressure support ventilation (PSV)Dyssynchrony

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Average effort of breathing

    Muscular pressure or Pmus (calculated from DPes and using the chest wall compliance of the participant and measured by specific software \[FluxReview\]) during the assisted modes. For each patient, the change in Pmus from SIMV to PSV and from SIMV to PCV will be computed. The within-patient difference between these changes will be summarized in terms of median and interquartile range, and assessed using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

    Analyses will be performed on patient-level summaries averaged over the last 25 minutes of each ventilation mode (SIMV, PCV, PSV).

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Dyssynchrony rate quantified by specific software (FluxReview)

    Approximately 90 minutes (30 minutes per mode of mechanical ventilation)

Study Arms (2)

PCV followed by PSV

EXPERIMENTAL

SIMV PC/PS (30 mins) followed by PCV (30 mins) followed by PSV (30 mins)

Device: Pressure Control ModeDevice: Pressure Support Mode

PSV followed by PCV

EXPERIMENTAL

SIMV PC/PS (30 mins) followed by PSV (30 mins) followed by PCV (30 mins)

Device: Pressure Control ModeDevice: Pressure Support Mode

Interventions

In pressure control mode every breath is controlled by the ventilator, including when the breaths are delivered. This mode is typically used when patients are sedated and unable to breathe on their own.

PCV followed by PSVPSV followed by PCV

In pressure support mode every breath is initiated and controlled by the patient. This mode is used when patients are awake enough to take all breaths on their own.

PCV followed by PSVPSV followed by PCV

Eligibility Criteria

AgeUp to 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Consent provided
  • Aged: birth to 18 years of age
  • Invasively mechanically ventilated and expected to remain intubated for ≥ 6 hours, in the ventilator weaning phase.

You may not qualify if:

  • Contraindication for esophageal catheter placement such as esophageal repair (e.g. esophageal surgery or esophageal varices)
  • On Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)
  • Undergoing assessment for brain death or brain death confirmed
  • Patients with a severe systemic disease that poses a constant threat to their life:
  • \<24 hrs post cardiac arrest
  • or more inotropes increasing by \>20% within the last 24 hrs
  • increase in ventilation support or an FiO2 change ≥30% within the last 24 hrs
  • most responsible physician (MRP) determine patient is not eligible for the study intervention

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids)

Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1E8, Canada

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Rodriguez Guerineau L, Nonoyama M, Masy V, Ferreyro BL, Floh A, Brochard L. Evolution of Mechanical Ventilation Practices in Neonatal Cardiac Patients: Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of Three 1-Year Epochs During 2000-2020. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2025 Sep 1;26(9):e1154-e1164. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003799. Epub 2025 Jul 30.

    PMID: 40736370BACKGROUND
  • Brochard L, Rauss A, Benito S, Conti G, Mancebo J, Rekik N, Gasparetto A, Lemaire F. Comparison of three methods of gradual withdrawal from ventilatory support during weaning from mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994 Oct;150(4):896-903. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.150.4.7921460.

    PMID: 7921460BACKGROUND
  • Esteban A, Frutos F, Tobin MJ, Alia I, Solsona JF, Valverdu I, Fernandez R, de la Cal MA, Benito S, Tomas R, et al. A comparison of four methods of weaning patients from mechanical ventilation. Spanish Lung Failure Collaborative Group. N Engl J Med. 1995 Feb 9;332(6):345-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199502093320601.

    PMID: 7823995BACKGROUND
  • Blokpoel RGT, Burgerhof JGM, Markhorst DG, Kneyber MCJ. Trends in Pediatric Patient-Ventilator Asynchrony During Invasive Mechanical Ventilation. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2021 Nov 1;22(11):993-997. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002788.

    PMID: 34054119BACKGROUND
  • Blokpoel RG, Burgerhof JG, Markhorst DG, Kneyber MC. Patient-Ventilator Asynchrony During Assisted Ventilation in Children. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016 May;17(5):e204-11. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000669.

    PMID: 26914624BACKGROUND
  • Blokpoel RGT, Koopman AA, van Dijk J, Kneyber MCJ. Additional work of breathing from trigger errors in mechanically ventilated children. Respir Res. 2020 Nov 10;21(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01561-3.

    PMID: 33172465BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Luciana Rodriguez Guerineau, M.D.

    The Hospital for Sick Children

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Luciana Rodriguez Guerineau, M.D.

CONTACT

Cynthia de Medeiros, M.Sc.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: An esophageal catheter will be inserted and calibrated for measuring esophageal pressure (Pes) swings. When the patients are in the ventilation weaning phase and triggering consistently in SIMV mode, a 30 min recording of respiratory signals will be performed (clinical mode, standard of care) followed by exposure to two modes of assisted ventilation: Pressure Control Ventilation (PCV) or Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV) in a randomized crossover manner for 30 min each.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Staff Physician

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 27, 2026

First Posted

September 1, 2026

Study Start

September 21, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2028

Last Updated

September 1, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations