NCT07793565

Brief Summary

Background: Electrical impedance tomography (EIT)-guided PEEP titration has been shown to improve regional ventilation distribution, increase respiratory system compliance, and reduce mechanical power in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), but its effect on mortality remains unproven. In patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS, prone positioning for 4 hours allows pulmonary ventilation and perfusion to reach a new steady state, with optimization of ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) matching and other pulmonary physiological parameters. However, whether dynamic PEEP titration guided by EIT at this time point can further optimize V/Q matching and other pulmonary physiological parameters compared with conventional methods has not been reported. Objective: To investigate whether EIT-guided PEEP titration performed at 4 hours after prone positioning initiation can further optimize V/Q matching and other pulmonary physiological parameters in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS undergoing prone positioning. Methods: This is a prospective, single-center, randomized, open-label, parallel-controlled physiological study. A total of 40 patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS (Berlin definition, PaO₂/FiO₂ \< 150 mmHg) will be enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the EIT-guided group or the control group. PEEP intervention will be performed at 4 hours after prone positioning initiation (T1) in both groups: the EIT group receives EIT-guided PEEP titration, while the control group receives PEEP set according to the ARDSNet/PEEP-FiO₂ table. The primary outcome is V/Q matching percentage assessed by EIT at 18 hours of prone positioning (T2) and 6 hours after supine repositioning (T3). Secondary outcomes include respiratory mechanics, EIT-derived parameters (regional ventilation distribution, global inhomogeneity index, center of ventilation), oxygenation indices, echocardiographic measures of cardiac function, and clinical outcomes (28-day mortality, ventilator-free days, ICU length of stay, etc.). Conclusion: This study will provide physiological evidence for early EIT-guided PEEP titration in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS undergoing prone positioning, and will lay the foundation for future large-scale clinical trials.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
10mo left

Started Aug 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 20, 2026

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 28, 2026

Completed
3 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 31, 2026

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 20, 2027

Expected
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2027

Last Updated

August 28, 2026

Status Verified

August 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

August 20, 2026

Last Update Submit

August 26, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Ventilation-Perfusion (V/Q) Matching Percentage

    V/Q matching percentage assessed by electrical impedance tomography (EIT) using the EIT Evaluation Tool (SDMI) V2.7.1. V/Q matching reflects the efficiency of pulmonary gas exchange and is calculated from regional ventilation and perfusion distribution maps.

    At 18 hours of prone positioning (T2) and at 6 hours after supine repositioning (T3)

Secondary Outcomes (15)

  • Respiratory System Compliance

    Baseline, T2 (18h prone), and T3 (6h post-supine)

  • Driving Pressure

    At baseline (T0), at 18 hours of prone positioning (T2), and at 6 hours after supine repositioning (T3)

  • EIT-Derived Regional Ventilation Distribution

    At baseline (T0), at 18 hours of prone positioning (T2), and at 6 hours after supine repositioning (T3)

  • RVEDA/LVEDA

    At baseline (T0) and at 6 hours after supine repositioning (T3)

  • RVFAC

    Baseline and 6h post-supine repositioning (T3)

  • +10 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

EIT-Guided PEEP Titration Group

EXPERIMENTAL

PEEP will be titrated using EIT monitoring at 4 hours after prone positioning initiation (T1). The optimal PEEP will be determined at the intersection of the cumulative collapse and overdistension curves, or at the lowest global inhomogeneity index if the intersection occurs between two PEEP levels.

Other: EIT-Guided PEEP Titration Group

ARDSNet/PEEP-FiO₂ Table Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

PEEP will be set according to the ARDSNet/PEEP-FiO₂ table at 4 hours after prone positioning initiation (T1).

Other: ARDSNet/PEEP-FiO₂ Table

Interventions

PEEP titration is performed during mechanical ventilation to optimize respiratory mechanics and ventilation-perfusion matching in patients with ARDS.

EIT-Guided PEEP Titration Group

PEEP will be set according to the ARDSNet/PEEP-FiO₂ table at 4 hours after prone positioning initiation (T1).

ARDSNet/PEEP-FiO₂ Table Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of moderate-to-severe ARDS according to the Berlin definition, with a PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio \< 150 mmHg on optimal mechanical ventilation.
  • Clinical decision has been made to place a central venous catheter (internal jugular or subclavian vein) for clinical management.

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnancy or postpartum state.
  • BMI \> 35 kg/m².
  • Duration of invasive mechanical ventilation \> 48 hours at enrollment.
  • Severe hemodynamic instability (mean arterial pressure \< 65 mmHg on norepinephrine ≥ 0.5 μg/kg/min).
  • Immediate need for veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) at enrollment.
  • Contraindications to prone positioning or EIT monitoring, including but not limited to: facial or cervical trauma; unstable spinal, femoral, pelvic, or rib fractures; recent cardiac surgery; pneumothorax; elevated intracranial pressure; pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; severe chronic lung disease (e.g., severe COPD, asthma, interstitial lung disease); severe cardiac dysfunction (New York Heart Association Class III or IV, acute coronary syndrome, sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia, or cardiogenic shock).
  • Lack of informed consent from legally authorized representative.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, China

Location

Related Publications (9)

  • Sang L, Lin Z, Zhao Z. How often do we need to update PEEP setting during prone positioning in ARDS? Crit Care. 2024 Feb 26;28(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04847-w. No abstract available.

    PMID: 38409024BACKGROUND
  • Servetti A, Battaglini D, Patroniti NA, Al Sharie S, Jouryyeh B, Al-Husinat L, Marini JJ, Rocco PRM. Optimising positive end-expiratory pressure in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a narrative review of approaches to titration. Br J Anaesth. 2026 May;136(5):1472-1481. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2025.12.048. Epub 2026 Jan 27.

    PMID: 41592990BACKGROUND
  • Cornejo R, Papazian L, Martin Delgado MC. Physiological effects of prone positioning during invasive mechanical ventilation: beyond PaO2. Intensive Care Med. 2026 Mar;52(3):574-577. doi: 10.1007/s00134-026-08305-9. Epub 2026 Feb 9. No abstract available.

    PMID: 41661291BACKGROUND
  • Guerin C, Reignier J, Richard JC, Beuret P, Gacouin A, Boulain T, Mercier E, Badet M, Mercat A, Baudin O, Clavel M, Chatellier D, Jaber S, Rosselli S, Mancebo J, Sirodot M, Hilbert G, Bengler C, Richecoeur J, Gainnier M, Bayle F, Bourdin G, Leray V, Girard R, Baboi L, Ayzac L; PROSEVA Study Group. Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 6;368(23):2159-68. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214103. Epub 2013 May 20.

    PMID: 23688302BACKGROUND
  • Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, Fan E, Brochard L, Esteban A, Gattinoni L, van Haren F, Larsson A, McAuley DF, Ranieri M, Rubenfeld G, Thompson BT, Wrigge H, Slutsky AS, Pesenti A; LUNG SAFE Investigators; ESICM Trials Group. Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and Mortality for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries. JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):788-800. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0291.

    PMID: 26903337BACKGROUND
  • Al-Husinat L, Azzam S, Al Sharie S, Araydah M, Battaglini D, Abushehab S, Cortes-Puentes GA, Schultz MJ, Rocco PRM. A narrative review on the future of ARDS: evolving definitions, pathophysiology, and tailored management. Crit Care. 2025 Feb 24;29(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05291-0.

    PMID: 39994815BACKGROUND
  • Wang R, Wang W, Tang X, Qi Z, Li T, Liu Y, Li H, Yan J, Yang H, Lyu W, Li Z, Sun B, Gan G. Association between ventilation-perfusion matching improvement during initial prone positioning and ICU mortality in patients with moderate to severe ARDS: a prospective two-center study. Ann Intensive Care. 2025 May 21;15(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13613-025-01489-1.

  • Songsangvorn N, Xu Y, Lu C, Rotstein O, Brochard L, Slutsky AS, Burns KEA, Zhang H. Electrical impedance tomography-guided positive end-expiratory pressure titration in ARDS: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2024 May;50(5):617-631. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07362-2. Epub 2024 Mar 21.

  • He H, Zhao Z, Becher T, Bellani G, Yoshida T, Amato MBP, Long Y, Frerichs I; REspiratory and Critical Care medicine EIT study (RECCE) group. Recommendations for lung ventilation and perfusion assessment with chest electrical impedance tomography in critically ill adult patients: an international evidence-based and expert Delphi consensus study. EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Oct 17;89:103575. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103575. eCollection 2025 Nov.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesRespiration Disorders

Study Officials

  • Min Xie

    Tongji Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Min Xie, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Jianmin Ling, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director of the Department of Intensive Care Unit

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 20, 2026

First Posted

August 28, 2026

Study Start

August 31, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 20, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Last Updated

August 28, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations