Effects of an AI Chatbot-Assisted Aerobic Exercise Guided by the Transtheoretical Model and Self-determination Theory With Machine Learning Algorithms to Provide Real-time, Personalized Feedback on Health Outcomes in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Study Start
August 14, 2025
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
December 31, 2030
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Study Completion
August 31, 2031
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
This study aims to develop and evaluate an AI-driven Personalized Exercise Feedback Program (AI-PEF) to enhance health outcomes in mTBI patients. Methods: AI-PEF integrates the transtheoretical model and self-determination theory with machine learning algorithms to provide real-time, personalized feedback. A phased randomized controlled trial will be conducted: Phase I,small-Scale Pilot Study (Early Feedback): A single-arm pilot study with 5 patients will be conducted over four weeks to gather feedback on usability, engagement, and content clarity.Phase II assesses the program's impact on functional capacity, sleep quality and depressive symptoms, with 50 participants in a 2-arm randomized trial in 3 months.Phase III will assess the program's impact on functional capacity, sleep quality and depressive symptoms, with 50 participants of waitlist control evaluation in a two-arm randomized trial.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
August 31, 2031
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
May 20, 2025
Actual (reported)August 14, 2025
Actual (reported)August 25, 2026
Actual (reported)December 31, 2030
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
August 31, 2031
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
6-Minute Walk Test
Functional capacity will be evaluated using the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), which measures the distance walked in six minutes as an indicator of functional exercise capacity. A longer walking distance(meter) indicates better functional capacity.
T0-baseline
6-Minute Walk Test
Functional capacity will be evaluated using the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), which measures the distance walked in six minutes as an indicator of functional exercise capacity. A longer walking distance(meter) indicates better functional capacity.
T1(1 month later)
6-Minute Walk Test
Functional capacity will be evaluated using the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), which measures the distance walked in six minutes as an indicator of functional exercise capacity. A longer walking distance(meter) indicates better functional capacity.
T2(2 month later)
6-Minute Walk Test
Functional capacity will be evaluated using the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), which measures the distance walked in six minutes as an indicator of functional exercise capacity. A longer walking distance(meter) indicates better functional capacity.
T3(3 month later)
6-Minute Walk Test
Functional capacity will be evaluated using the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), which measures the distance walked in six minutes as an indicator of functional exercise capacity. A longer walking distance(meter) indicates better functional capacity.
T4(6 month later)
Adherence
Exercise adherence will be defined as the percentage of prescribed sessions completed during the 12-week intervention, based on three 30-minute sessions per week (36 sessions in total). The Garmin Vivosmart 5 will record exercise frequency, duration, and intensity. A session will be considered completed when the participant exercises for at least 30 minutes and reaches Garmin heart rate zone 2 or higher. Adherence will be calculated by summing completed sessions, with a maximum of three sessions counted per week, dividing by 36, and multiplying by 100. Scores range from 0% to 100%, with higher percentages indicating greater adherence. Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) will complement intensity assessment, particularly for older participants or those with heart rate or blood pressure concerns. An RPE of ≥12 indicates moderate intensity, while ≥11 may be encouraged initially, followed by gradual progression as tolerated.
T0-baseline
Adherence
Exercise adherence will be defined as the percentage of prescribed sessions completed during the 12-week intervention, based on three 30-minute sessions per week (36 sessions in total). The Garmin Vivosmart 5 will record exercise frequency, duration, and intensity. A session will be considered completed when the participant exercises for at least 30 minutes and reaches Garmin heart rate zone 2 or higher. Adherence will be calculated by summing completed sessions, with a maximum of three sessions counted per week, dividing by 36, and multiplying by 100. Scores range from 0% to 100%, with higher percentages indicating greater adherence. Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) will complement intensity assessment, particularly for older participants or those with heart rate or blood pressure concerns. An RPE of ≥12 indicates moderate intensity, while ≥11 may be encouraged initially, followed by gradual progression as tolerated.
T1(1 month later)
Adherence
Exercise adherence will be defined as the percentage of prescribed sessions completed during the 12-week intervention, based on three 30-minute sessions per week (36 sessions in total). The Garmin Vivosmart 5 will record exercise frequency, duration, and intensity. A session will be considered completed when the participant exercises for at least 30 minutes and reaches Garmin heart rate zone 2 or higher. Adherence will be calculated by summing completed sessions, with a maximum of three sessions counted per week, dividing by 36, and multiplying by 100. Scores range from 0% to 100%, with higher percentages indicating greater adherence. Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) will complement intensity assessment, particularly for older participants or those with heart rate or blood pressure concerns. An RPE of ≥12 indicates moderate intensity, while ≥11 may be encouraged initially, followed by gradual progression as tolerated.
T2(2 month later)
Adherence
Exercise adherence will be defined as the percentage of prescribed sessions completed during the 12-week intervention, based on three 30-minute sessions per week (36 sessions in total). The Garmin Vivosmart 5 will record exercise frequency, duration, and intensity. A session will be considered completed when the participant exercises for at least 30 minutes and reaches Garmin heart rate zone 2 or higher. Adherence will be calculated by summing completed sessions, with a maximum of three sessions counted per week, dividing by 36, and multiplying by 100. Scores range from 0% to 100%, with higher percentages indicating greater adherence. Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) will complement intensity assessment, particularly for older participants or those with heart rate or blood pressure concerns. An RPE of ≥12 indicates moderate intensity, while ≥11 may be encouraged initially, followed by gradual progression as tolerated.
T3(3 month later)
Adherence
Exercise adherence will be defined as the percentage of prescribed sessions completed during the 12-week intervention, based on three 30-minute sessions per week (36 sessions in total). The Garmin Vivosmart 5 will record exercise frequency, duration, and intensity. A session will be considered completed when the participant exercises for at least 30 minutes and reaches Garmin heart rate zone 2 or higher. Adherence will be calculated by summing completed sessions, with a maximum of three sessions counted per week, dividing by 36, and multiplying by 100. Scores range from 0% to 100%, with higher percentages indicating greater adherence. Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) will complement intensity assessment, particularly for older participants or those with heart rate or blood pressure concerns. An RPE of ≥12 indicates moderate intensity, while ≥11 may be encouraged initially, followed by gradual progression as tolerated.
T4(6 month later)
The Chinese Version of the Sport Motivation Scale-II
The Chinese version of the Sport Motivation Scale-II (CSMS-II) will be used to assess six types of motivation: intrinsic motivation, integrated regulation, identified regulation, introjected regulation, external regulation, and amotivation. The scale consists of 18 items rated on a 7-point Likert scale from 1 to 7. The subscales include intrinsic motivation (items 3, 9, and 17), integrated regulation (items 4, 11, and 14), identified regulation (items 6, 12, and 18), introjected regulation (items 1, 7, and 16), external regulation (items 5, 8, and 15), and amotivation (items 2, 10, and 13). Each subscale is scored separately by calculating the mean of its three items. Each subscale score ranges from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating a stronger level of the corresponding motivational regulation.
T0-baseline
The Chinese Version of the Sport Motivation Scale-II
The Chinese version of the Sport Motivation Scale-II (CSMS-II) will be used to assess six types of motivation: intrinsic motivation, integrated regulation, identified regulation, introjected regulation, external regulation, and amotivation. The scale consists of 18 items rated on a 7-point Likert scale from 1 to 7. The subscales include intrinsic motivation (items 3, 9, and 17), integrated regulation (items 4, 11, and 14), identified regulation (items 6, 12, and 18), introjected regulation (items 1, 7, and 16), external regulation (items 5, 8, and 15), and amotivation (items 2, 10, and 13). Each subscale is scored separately by calculating the mean of its three items. Each subscale score ranges from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating a stronger level of the corresponding motivational regulation.
T1(1 month later)
The Chinese Version of the Sport Motivation Scale-II
The Chinese version of the Sport Motivation Scale-II (CSMS-II) will be used to assess six types of motivation: intrinsic motivation, integrated regulation, identified regulation, introjected regulation, external regulation, and amotivation. The scale consists of 18 items rated on a 7-point Likert scale from 1 to 7. The subscales include intrinsic motivation (items 3, 9, and 17), integrated regulation (items 4, 11, and 14), identified regulation (items 6, 12, and 18), introjected regulation (items 1, 7, and 16), external regulation (items 5, 8, and 15), and amotivation (items 2, 10, and 13). Each subscale is scored separately by calculating the mean of its three items. Each subscale score ranges from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating a stronger level of the corresponding motivational regulation.
T2(2 month later)
The Chinese Version of the Sport Motivation Scale-II
The Chinese version of the Sport Motivation Scale-II (CSMS-II) will be used to assess six types of motivation: intrinsic motivation, integrated regulation, identified regulation, introjected regulation, external regulation, and amotivation. The scale consists of 18 items rated on a 7-point Likert scale from 1 to 7. The subscales include intrinsic motivation (items 3, 9, and 17), integrated regulation (items 4, 11, and 14), identified regulation (items 6, 12, and 18), introjected regulation (items 1, 7, and 16), external regulation (items 5, 8, and 15), and amotivation (items 2, 10, and 13). Each subscale is scored separately by calculating the mean of its three items. Each subscale score ranges from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating a stronger level of the corresponding motivational regulation.
T3(3 month later)
The Chinese Version of the Sport Motivation Scale-II
The Chinese version of the Sport Motivation Scale-II (CSMS-II) will be used to assess six types of motivation: intrinsic motivation, integrated regulation, identified regulation, introjected regulation, external regulation, and amotivation. The scale consists of 18 items rated on a 7-point Likert scale from 1 to 7. The subscales include intrinsic motivation (items 3, 9, and 17), integrated regulation (items 4, 11, and 14), identified regulation (items 6, 12, and 18), introjected regulation (items 1, 7, and 16), external regulation (items 5, 8, and 15), and amotivation (items 2, 10, and 13). Each subscale is scored separately by calculating the mean of its three items. Each subscale score ranges from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating a stronger level of the corresponding motivational regulation.
T4(6 month later)
The mHealth App usability questionnaire
The Mobile App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ) assesses usability across three dimensions: usability and satisfaction, system information arrangement, and system efficiency. A Chinese version of the questionnaire was developed in 2022, with an internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α) of 0.988 and an internal consistency range of 0.845-0.931. The test-retest reliability ranges from 0.828 to 0.918. A total of 21 items, Likert scale scores ranged from 1 (strongly agree) to 7 (strongly disagree), indicating the lower scores the better usability.
T0-baseline
The mHealth App usability questionnaire
The Mobile App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ) assesses usability across three dimensions: usability and satisfaction, system information arrangement, and system efficiency. A Chinese version of the questionnaire was developed in 2022, with an internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α) of 0.988 and an internal consistency range of 0.845-0.931. The test-retest reliability ranges from 0.828 to 0.918. A total of 21 items, Likert scale scores ranged from 1 (strongly agree) to 7 (strongly disagree), indicating the lower scores the better usability.
T1(1 month later)
The mHealth App usability questionnaire
The Mobile App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ) assesses usability across three dimensions: usability and satisfaction, system information arrangement, and system efficiency. A Chinese version of the questionnaire was developed in 2022, with an internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α) of 0.988 and an internal consistency range of 0.845-0.931. The test-retest reliability ranges from 0.828 to 0.918. A total of 21 items, Likert scale scores ranged from 1 (strongly agree) to 7 (strongly disagree), indicating the lower scores the better usability.
T2(2 month later)
The mHealth App usability questionnaire
The Mobile App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ) assesses usability across three dimensions: usability and satisfaction, system information arrangement, and system efficiency. A Chinese version of the questionnaire was developed in 2022, with an internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α) of 0.988 and an internal consistency range of 0.845-0.931. The test-retest reliability ranges from 0.828 to 0.918. A total of 21 items, Likert scale scores ranged from 1 (strongly agree) to 7 (strongly disagree), indicating the lower scores the better usability.
T3(3 month later)
The mHealth App usability questionnaire
The Mobile App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ) assesses usability across three dimensions: usability and satisfaction, system information arrangement, and system efficiency. A Chinese version of the questionnaire was developed in 2022, with an internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α) of 0.988 and an internal consistency range of 0.845-0.931. The test-retest reliability ranges from 0.828 to 0.918. A total of 21 items, Likert scale scores ranged from 1 (strongly agree) to 7 (strongly disagree), indicating the lower scores the better usability.
T4(6 month later)
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
T0-baseline
The Beck Depression Inventory-II
T0-baseline
The Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire
T0(baseline)
The Godin-Shephard Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire
T0( baseline)
The World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale-brief
T0( baseline)
the AI-PEF group, receiving a machine learning-powered personalized exercise program.
the Active control group, receiving general exercise recommendations as part of standard care in a 1:1 ratio.
Participants will follow a 6months walking program with five 30-minute sessions per week, progressively increasing intensity based on heart rate and effort indices. Garmin fitness trackers will monitor adherence and intensity. Remote guidance will support participants via weekly digital health messages on the LINE app, offering personalized feedback, goal reinforcement, and lifestyle recommendations. Participants will also receiThese AI feedback implementations will be tailored to complement the in-person education and will include reminders of the individualized goals set during the remote exercise intervention and consultation . The digital component will also offer a platform for patients to share their progress and seek further guidance during the scheduled in-person consultation. The use of digital AI feedback aligns with the trend of integrating technology into healthcare services, providing a convenient and accessible modality for supporting parents engaging in regular exercise.
Tri-Service General Hospital
Taipei, 11490, Taiwan
First Submitted
May 20, 2025
First Posted
August 25, 2026
Study Start
August 14, 2025
Effects of Communication Training for Mental Health Occupational Therapy Interns
Participants in the active control group will receive standard TBI care, including Garmin-based self-monitoring and routine clinic visits at baseline (T0), 1 months (T1), 2months(T2),and 3 months (T3). These visits will include general health education and recommendations on daily physical activity. No personalized or digital exercise strategies will be provided. Participants completing the 3-month protocol will have the option to access the AI-PEF program. When active control group participants completing the 3-month protocol will have the option to access the AI-PEF program.Then participants will use AI-PEF program to be the waitlist control group after 3 months to 6months, with assessments conducted at 6 months (T4).
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Primary Completion
December 31, 2030
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Study Completion
August 31, 2031
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Last Updated
August 25, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-08
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: