TENS Use for Post-cesarean Pain Management
Continuous 24-Hour Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Post-Cesarean Pain Management: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
196
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of continuous 24-hour Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) as an adjunct to standard postoperative care for pain management following cesarean delivery. Eligible women undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention group, which will receive continuous TENS in addition to standard postoperative analgesia, or the control group, which will receive standard postoperative analgesia alone. The primary outcome is the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score assessed 24 hours after cesarean delivery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2026
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 15, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 20, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2027
September 28, 2026
September 1, 2026
11 months
August 15, 2026
September 23, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) total score
The Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) is a validated 15-item patient-reported questionnaire that assesses postoperative recovery across five domains: pain, physical comfort, physical independence, psychological support, and emotional state. Each item is scored from 0 to 10, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 150, with higher scores indicating better postoperative recovery.
24 hours after cesarean delivery
Secondary Outcomes (15)
Postoperative pain intensity at rest
2-4, 8-10, 24, and 48 hours after cesarean delivery
Postoperative pain intensity during movement
2-4, 8-10, 24, and 48 hours after cesarean delivery
Satisfaction with pain control
24 and 48 hours after cesarean delivery
Total opioid consumption
Within 72 hours after cesarean delivery
Time to first bowel function
Within hospitalization (up to discharge, approximately 72 hours)
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
TENS Group
EXPERIMENTALPatient will receive TENS within 2 hours after surgery in addition to the standard analgesic protocol.
No-TENS Control Group
NO INTERVENTIONPatients will receive the standard analgesic protocol only.
Interventions
Participants randomized to the intervention group will receive TENS in addition to standard postoperative analgesia. TENS will be initiated within 2 hours after cesarean delivery and administered during the first 24 postoperative hours. Participants will be instructed to wear the device continuously during this period. Each TENS stimulation cycle will last 1 hour, using a frequency of 80 Hz, a pulse width of 200 µs, and an intensity of 20-40 mA. Participants will be encouraged to restart the stimulation program at the end of each hourly cycle for up to 24 hours. Stimulation may be temporarily discontinued in the event of discomfort or skin irritation, during mobilization or hygiene activities, or at the participant's request. All participants will additionally receive the institution's standard postoperative care and analgesic regimen following cesarean delivery.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women aged 18-45 years.
- Undergoing CD under spinal anesthesia.
- Hemodynamically stable postoperatively.
- Able to provide informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Undergoing CD under epidural or general anesthesia.
- Skin lesions or infection at electrode placement sites.
- Pacemaker or implanted electrical devices.
- Neurological disorders affecting pain perception.
- Chronic opioid use or chronic pain disorders.
- Allergy or other contraindication to opioids, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, or acetaminophen use.
- Adhesive allergy.
- Midline vertical skin incision (in the current or previous cesarean).
- Intraoperative sterilization.
- Cesarean hysterectomy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Holy Family Hospital
Nazareth, Israel
Related Publications (18)
Kleif J, Waage J, Christensen KB, Gogenur I. Systematic review of the QoR-15 score, a patient- reported outcome measure measuring quality of recovery after surgery and anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Jan;120(1):28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.013. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
PMID: 29397134BACKGROUNDChazapis M, Walker EM, Rooms MA, Kamming D, Moonesinghe SR. Measuring quality of recovery-15 after day case surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Feb;116(2):241-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev413.
PMID: 26787793BACKGROUNDGarmi G, Parasol M, Zafran N, Rudin M, Romano S, Salim R. Efficacy of Single Wound Infiltration With Bupivacaine and Adrenaline During Cesarean Delivery for Reduction of Postoperative Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2242203. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.42203.
PMID: 36378307BACKGROUNDAlbadrani MS, Elhusein AM, Ali Fadlalmola H et al. The Clinical Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Enhancing Recovery after Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Current Women s Health Reviews. 2024;20(5):53-64. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573404820666230731100639.
BACKGROUNDZimpel SA, Torloni MR, Porfirio GJ, Flumignan RL, da Silva EM. Complementary and alternative therapies for post-caesarean pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 1;9(9):CD011216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011216.pub2.
PMID: 32871021BACKGROUNDVance CG, Dailey DL, Rakel BA, Sluka KA. Using TENS for pain control: the state of the evidence. Pain Manag. 2014 May;4(3):197-209. doi: 10.2217/pmt.14.13.
PMID: 24953072BACKGROUNDSmith BH, Lee J, Price C, Baranowski AP. Neuropathic pain: a pathway for care developed by the British Pain Society. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Jul;111(1):73-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet206.
PMID: 23794648BACKGROUNDBjordal JM, Johnson MI, Ljunggreen AE. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) can reduce postoperative analgesic consumption. A meta-analysis with assessment of optimal treatment parameters for postoperative pain. Eur J Pain. 2003;7(2):181-8. doi: 10.1016/S1090-3801(02)00098-8.
PMID: 12600800BACKGROUNDJohnson MI, Walsh DM. Pain: continued uncertainty of TENS' effectiveness for pain relief. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2010 Jun;6(6):314-6. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2010.77. No abstract available.
PMID: 20520646BACKGROUNDSluka KA, Walsh D. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: basic science mechanisms and clinical effectiveness. J Pain. 2003 Apr;4(3):109-21. doi: 10.1054/jpai.2003.434.
PMID: 14622708BACKGROUNDHalawani RK El, Elmokadem EM, Ismael KS et al. Adjuvant therapies for postoperative pain management in cesarean section: A comprehensive review of clinical evidence. Futur J Pharm Sci. 2026;12(1):45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43094-026-00956-1.
BACKGROUNDCarvalho B, Butwick AJ. Postcesarean delivery analgesia. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2017 Mar;31(1):69-79. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2017.01.003. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
PMID: 28625307BACKGROUNDPharmacologic Stepwise Multimodal Approach for Postpartum Pain Management: ACOG Clinical Consensus No. 1. Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Sep 1;138(3):507-517. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004517.
PMID: 34412076BACKGROUNDACOG Committee Opinion No. 742: Postpartum Pain Management. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;132(1):e35-e43. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002683.
PMID: 29781876BACKGROUNDJin J, Peng L, Chen Q, Zhang D, Ren L, Qin P, Min S. Prevalence and risk factors for chronic pain following cesarean section: a prospective study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2016 Oct 18;16(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12871-016-0270-6.
PMID: 27756207BACKGROUNDCiechanowicz S, Joy RR, Kasmirski J, Blake L, Carvalho B, Sultan P. Incidence, Severity, and Interference of Chronic Postsurgical Pain After Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2025 Jun;104:111832. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111832. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
PMID: 40279839BACKGROUNDShtainmetz N, Tesler R, Ash N, Korn L. Implementation of the Robson classification for caesarean sections in Israel: a 10-year cross-sectional study. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2025 Nov 4;14(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13584-025-00726-z.
PMID: 41184971BACKGROUNDDemilew BC, Zurbachew N, Getachew N, Mekete G, Lema DT. Prevalence and Associated Factors of Postoperative Acute Pain for Mothers Who Gave Birth With Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pain Manag Nurs. 2024 Dec;25(6):e452-e464. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.05.010. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
PMID: 39033057BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Raed Salim
The Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar Ilan University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 15, 2026
First Posted
August 20, 2026
Study Start
September 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2027
Last Updated
September 28, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR
- Time Frame
- After publication (starting 6 months after publication).
- Access Criteria
- De-identified IPD will be available to academic or clinical researchers for meta-analyses, and research addressing questions related to the study topic. Requests must include a research protocol, statistical analysis plan, ethics approval, and details of the research team. Requests will be reviewed by the principal investigator. Data will be provided after approval and completion of a data-sharing agreement.
Individual patient data (IPD) that underlie results in a publication