NCT07777224

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if an artificial intelligence (AI) tool that listens to appointments and drafts clinical notes can help clinicians in psychiatric care. Researchers also want to know if the tool changes how patients experience their care. The study includes mental health care providers (physicians, psychologists/psychotherapists, nurses, and social workers) at Psychiatrie St. Gallen and the adult patients they see in their appointments. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does the AI tool lower the time clinicians spend writing notes?
  • Are notes written with the AI tool as good as or better than notes written without it?
  • Do patients notice a difference in their relationship with their clinician when the tool is used? Researchers will compare clinicians who use the AI tool to clinicians who keep writing notes their usual way, before and during the intervention period, to see if writing time, note quality, and the patient-rated therapeutic relationship differ between the two groups. Clinicians will: Join one of two groups. One group starts using the AI tool on August 14, 2026. The other group keeps writing notes the usual way. Both groups will be observed until the end of November 2026, with note quality evaluation completed in December 2026. Clinicians who cannot contribute to all measurements may, with their consent, remain in the study for automated measurement of documentation time only. Patients will:
  • Be invited to fill out a short, anonymous survey about their experience with their clinician.
  • Be asked to agree, in writing, that researchers may review the report from their initial assessment appointment.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
47

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
3mo left

Started Jul 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

8 active sites

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress48%
Jul 2026Dec 2026

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 13, 2026

Completed
24 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 6, 2026

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 20, 2026

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2026

Last Updated

August 20, 2026

Status Verified

August 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

August 6, 2026

Last Update Submit

August 18, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Artificial IntelligencePsychiatryAmbient Scribing

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Time spent on psychiatric documentation

    Mean minutes spent writing clinical notes (progress notes, initial psychiatric assessment reports, and discharge letters), extracted automatically from EHR (ORBIS) audit logs as form-level editing durations, compared pre-intervention vs. during intervention between groups.

    24 Weeks

  • Documentation quality of initial psychiatric asessment reports

    Quality of initial psychiatric assessment reports rated with the Physician Documentation Quality Instrument, 9-item version (PDQI-9). Each of the 9 items is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree) and summed to a total score ranging from 9 (minimum) to 45 (maximum); higher scores indicate better documentation quality. Each report is independently rated by 2 of 8 experienced mental health specialists in a balanced rotating-pair design, blinded to provider identity, group, time point, and site.

    24 Weeks

  • Working Alliance

    Patient-rated working alliance measured with the Working Alliance Inventory-Short Revised, German patient version (WAI-SR). The 12 items are each scored on a 5-point scale (1 to 5) and summed to a total score ranging from 12 (minimum) to 60 (maximum); higher scores indicate a stronger (better) working alliance. Reported anonymously by patients after outpatient consultations. In addition to the two-sided superiority test, non-inferiority is prespecified: a lower bound of the two-sided 95% CI of the difference-in-differences estimate above -3.5 WAI-SR sum-scale points will be interpreted as evidence against a clinically relevant deterioration of the alliance.

    5 weeks pre intervention and 5 weeks during the intervention.

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Time passed from initial psychiatric assessment note creation to its completion

    24 Weeks

  • Guideline-relevant information coverage and density in initial psychiatric assessment reports

    24 Weeks

  • Patient-perceived empathy of mental health care providers during consultations

    5 weeks pre intervention and 5 weeks during the intervention.

  • Documentation quality of ambient scribe-generated initial psychiatric assessment reports (raw AI output)

    15 Weeks

  • Clinician Burnout

    5 weeks in the pre-intervention period and the last Week (Week 15) of the post-intervention period.

Study Arms (2)

Control Group

NO INTERVENTION

The mental health care providers (physicians, psychologists/psychotherapists, nurses, and social workers) in this group document their consultations as usual (typing or conventional dictation), without access to the ambient scribe. Under institutional policy, all clinicians irrespective of study participation may use general-purpose AI tools for administrative and documentation support, provided no patient-identifying data are entered; the control condition is therefore defined as documentation without the ambient scribe, not as documentation without any AI assistance.

AI-Group

EXPERIMENTAL

The mental health care providers in this group use an AI ambient scribe to create their clinical notes from consultations, beginning August 14, 2026.

Device: Artificial Intelligence Ambient Scribe

Interventions

Listener Tool of the SwissGPT application (AlpineAI AG). After the patient's verbal consent, the provider records the consultation audio via mobile phone or laptop. All audio and text data are processed exclusively on AlpineAI's own GPU infrastructure located in Switzerland and are encrypted with individual keys per customer and per data type. Transcription uses the speech-to-text models Whisper 3 Turbo; from the transcript, a draft clinical note is generated by open-weight large language model Mistral Large 3 based on a standardized prompt developed for the institution. The provider transfers the generated draft note unedited into the electronic health record (ORBIS) and performs all review and editing directly in the EHR, so that the effort of correcting AI-generated drafts is captured by the automated documentation-time measurement. Audio recordings and transcripts are automatically deleted after 30 days.

Also known as: Artificial Intelligence
AI-Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Readiness to use an artificial intelligence ambient scribe during patient consultations (intervention group)
  • Regular clinical consultations with adult psychiatric patients
  • Two outcome-specific criteria apply: contribution to the report quality outcomes requires that the provider regularly conducts new-patient intakes and writes initial psychiatric assessment reports; contribution to the patient-reported outcomes requires working in the outpatient setting. Providers who cannot or no longer wish to contribute to any actively collected outcome may, with their consent, remain enrolled for passive documentation-time measurement only; for analysis, such providers stay in the group which was fixed at enrollment..

You may not qualify if:

  • notice of termination of the employment contract given during the data collection period
  • Working in the dementia inpatient clinic
  • Patients are not the observed population, but anonymous ratings of their subjective consultation experience are collected from them, and written consent for the review of initial assessment reports is obtained.
  • \- All adult patients visiting the outpatient clinic during the data collection periods for a consultation with a participating provider
  • Insufficient German proficiency (below level B2)
  • Cognitive impairment precluding informed participation
  • Acute psychosis, acute suicidality, mania, or intoxication
  • Severe emotional distress

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (8)

Psychiatrie St. Gallen

Heerbrugg, Canton of St. Gallen, 9435, Switzerland

Location

Psychiatrie St. Gallen

Pfäfers Dorf, Canton of St. Gallen, 7312, Switzerland

Location

Psychiatrie St. Gallen

Rorschach, Canton of St. Gallen, 9400, Switzerland

Location

Psychiatrie St. Gallen

Sankt Gallen, Canton of St. Gallen, 9000, Switzerland

Location

Psychiatrie St. Gallen

Sargans, Canton of St. Gallen, 7320, Switzerland

Location

Psychiatrie St. Gallen

Uznach, Canton of St. Gallen, 8730, Switzerland

Location

Psychiatrie St. Gallen

Wattwil, Canton of St. Gallen, 9630, Switzerland

Location

Psychiatrie St. Gallen

Wil, Canton of St. Gallen, 9500, Switzerland

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Burnout, Psychological

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Stress, PsychologicalBehavioral SymptomsBehavior

Study Officials

  • Maja Dobelsek, MD

    Universität St. Gallen

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Providers and patients cannot be masked. Outcome assessors for report quality (PDQI-9 specialist raters) are blinded to provider identity, group allocation, time point, and site through removal of all directly identifying information from the reports before rating. Because AI-drafted notes may exhibit recognizable structure, blinding to scribe use cannot be assumed to be complete; as a prespecified manipulation check, raters record a forced-choice guess of scribe use for every report, and guess accuracy will be reported.
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Nonrandomized, open-label controlled trial with parallel assignment at the level of mental health care providers, analyzed within a difference-in-differences (DiD) framework. Outcomes are measured in both groups before and during the intervention period. Providers group assignment is fixed at enrollment.
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Acting Consultant Psychiatrist & Head of the Wattwil Outpatient Clinic

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 6, 2026

First Posted

August 20, 2026

Study Start

July 13, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Last Updated

August 20, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations