Reliability of Expired Allergens in Patch Testing: A Comparative Study With Non-Expired Series
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patch testing remains the gold standard in the diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis. Patches used in testing consist of a wide spectrum of allergens, with variability in the stability of products over time. Due to limited allergen stability, careful storage and preparation is needed to prevent product degradation over time. Expiration dates are provided by manufacturers to ensure stability and reactivity, while minimizing the risk of product degradation contributing to inaccurate testing results. Preparation of patch series can be time intensive and procurement of allergens comes with an associated economic burden. Expired allergens are not routinely used in patch testing, however many clinics have expired allergens accessible. There is paucity of evidence comparing the reactivity of expired vs non-expired patch series. If expired allergens remain effective, this could result in significant cost-savings and accessibility implications for dermatology practice.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Sep 2026
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 7, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 14, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2027
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2027
August 14, 2026
July 1, 2026
1.2 years
July 7, 2026
August 10, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patch Testing Response (Positive/Negative) Concordance Rate (%) Between Non-Expired and Expired Allergens
Each allergen will be graded on response using a standard patch test scale including: irritant reaction \['IR'\], '+/-' for doubtful, '+' for erythema and infiltration, '++' for edematous or vesicular and '+++' for spreading, bullous or ulcerative response that will be graded by the participating Dermatologist. Reactions graded '+', "++", or "+++" are consider a positive result. Concordance rate will be expressed as a percentage (%) between tested allergens that were non-expired and that were expired (i.e. Nickel sulfate hexahydrate was found to have a 92% concordance rate, meaning that in 92% of cases, the Nickel allergen in the non-expired and expired patches were both found to both be either positive or negative while in 8% of cases the response differed per the scale listed above.)
Standard patch test series are applied on Day 0. Participant removal of patches on Day 2 and self photos taken and sent to Dermatologist for virtual reading. Final reading completed in clinic by Dermatologist on Day 4 or 5, recording reaction scores.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Reaction/Morphology Scoring Concordance (%)
Standard patch test series are applied on Day 0. Participant remove patches on Day 2, photos taken and sent to Dermatologist for virtual reading. Final reading completed in clinic by Dermatologist on Day 4 or 5, recording reaction scores, morphology.
Stability Concordance (%) Amongst Mediums
Standard patch test series are applied on Day 0. Participant remove patches on Day 2, photos taken and sent to Dermatologist for virtual reading. Final reading completed in clinic by Dermatologist on Day 4 or 5, recording reaction scores, morphology.
Irritant Reaction Rates (%)
Standard patch test series are applied on Day 0. Participant remove patches on Day 2, photos taken and sent to Dermatologist for virtual reading. Final reading completed in clinic by Dermatologist on Day 4 or 5, recording reaction scores, morphology.
Study Arms (1)
Enrolled Study Participants
OTHERAll enrolled participants will be simultaneously patch tested with both expired and non-expired patches. Therefore, there is no difference in intervention amongst study participants.
Interventions
All enrolled participants will be simultaneously patch tested with both expired and non-expired patches. Therefore, there is no difference in intervention amongst study participants.
All enrolled participants will be simultaneously patch tested with both expired and non-expired patches. Therefore, there is no difference in intervention amongst study participants.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults (age 18 years or older) referred for patch testing.
You may not qualify if:
- Relative or absolute contraindication to patch testing
- Wide spread dermatitis prior to patch placement
- Inability to return to clinic for reading of results
- Patient non-consenting
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Richmond Road Diagnostic Treatment Centre
Calgary, Alberta, T2T 5C7, Canada
Related Publications (9)
Houle MC, DeKoven JG, Atwater AR, Reeder MJ, Warshaw EM, Pratt MD, Belsito DV, Adler BL, Silverberg J, Yu J, Botto N, Mowad CM, Dunnick CA, Taylor JS. North American Contact Dermatitis Group Patch Test Results: 2021-2022. Dermatitis. 2025 Sep-Oct;36(5):464-476. doi: 10.1089/derm.2024.0474. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
PMID: 40274377RESULTSchalock PC, Dunnick CA, Nedorost S, Brod B, Warshaw E, Mowad C, Scheman A; American Contact Dermatitis Society Core Allergen Series Committee. American Contact Dermatitis Society Core Allergen Series: 2020 Update. Dermatitis. 2020 Sep-Oct;31(5):279-282. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000621.
PMID: 32947457RESULTSiegel PD, Fowler JF, Law BF, Warshaw EM, Taylor JS. Concentrations and stability of methyl methacrylate, glutaraldehyde, formaldehyde and nickel sulfate in commercial patch test allergen preparations. Contact Dermatitis. 2014 May;70(5):309-15. doi: 10.1111/cod.12169.
PMID: 24731086RESULTMowitz M, Svedman C, Zimerson E, Bruze M. Fragrance patch tests prepared in advance may give false-negative reactions. Contact Dermatitis. 2014 Nov;71(5):289-94. doi: 10.1111/cod.12300. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
PMID: 25231568RESULTMose KF, Andersen KE, Christensen LP. Stability of selected volatile contact allergens in different patch test chambers under different storage conditions. Contact Dermatitis. 2012 Apr;66(4):172-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.02035.x.
PMID: 22404192RESULTGoon AT, Bruze M, Zimerson E, Sorensen O, Goh CL, Koh DS, Isaksson M. Variation in allergen content over time of acrylates/methacrylates in patch test preparations. Br J Dermatol. 2011 Jan;164(1):116-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.10087.x.
PMID: 21039407RESULTJohansen JD, Aalto-Korte K, Agner T, Andersen KE, Bircher A, Bruze M, Cannavo A, Gimenez-Arnau A, Goncalo M, Goossens A, John SM, Liden C, Lindberg M, Mahler V, Matura M, Rustemeyer T, Serup J, Spiewak R, Thyssen JP, Vigan M, White IR, Wilkinson M, Uter W. European Society of Contact Dermatitis guideline for diagnostic patch testing - recommendations on best practice. Contact Dermatitis. 2015 Oct;73(4):195-221. doi: 10.1111/cod.12432. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
PMID: 26179009RESULTRodrigues Barata AR, Haroun-Diaz E, Conde-Salazar Gomez L. Can expired TRUE Test(R) be used for patch testing? Contact Dermatitis. 2014 Jun;70(6):381-2. doi: 10.1111/cod.12175. No abstract available.
PMID: 24846590RESULTMahajan VK, Chauhan PS, Mehta KS, Sharma A, Chowdhary B, Dhattarwal N, Sharma H, Chandel M, Verma YR. Patch testing with expired Indian patch test kits: Results of a pilot study. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2022 Mar-Apr;88(2):188-195. doi: 10.25259/IJDVL_390_19.
PMID: 33969657RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Laurie Parsons, Medical Doctor
University of Calgary
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- No masking is needed given data is all observational and based on clinical response.
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principle Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 7, 2026
First Posted
August 14, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
September 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Last Updated
August 14, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Aside from eventual publication of study results to help guide practice, we will not be sharing granular study data with other researchers for expansion of the study.