Evaluating iCare COMPASS as a Visual Field Diagnostic Tool
1 other identifier
interventional
28
1 country
1
Brief Summary
this study seeks to compare the Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer and iCare COMPASS for both clinical accuracy and operational advantages.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 7, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 16, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 16, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 11, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 14, 2026
CompletedAugust 14, 2026
August 1, 2026
11 months
August 11, 2026
August 11, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Visual Fields will be assessed via the current standard of care Humphrey SITA-Faster when available. The mean deviation, pattern standard deviation, mean deviation cluster, and fixation plot obtained will be compared with the same measures on the iCare
Testing will be performed with either one or two encounters with the patient or as determined by the patients' clinician.
within 1-3 months post visit
Study Arms (2)
HUMPHREY SITA FASTER VS ICARE COMPASS
ACTIVE COMPARATORSUBJECTS WILL BE RANDOMIZED TO TESTING ON THE HUMPHREY SITA FASTER VISUAL FIELD FIRST, THEN WILL TEST ON THE ICARE COMPASS VISUAL FIELD MACHINE
ICARE COMPASS VS HUMPHREY SITA FASTER
ACTIVE COMPARATORSUBJECTS WILL BE RANDOMIZED TO TEST FIRST ON THE ICARE COMPASS VISUAL FIELD MACHINE, THEN WILL TEST ON THE HUMPHREY SITA FASTER VISUAL FIELD MACHINE
Interventions
This study will be a crossover study. Patients who express interest in taking part in the study will be evaluated using Humphrey SITA-faster, which is the current standard of care for visual perimetry, and the iCare COMPASS in the same visit. Participants will be assigned to one of two groups of alternating testing order with the Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer vs the iCare COMPASS and vice versa. The mean deviation, pattern standard deviation, mean deviation cluster, and fixation plot results will be compared. For analysis, participants will be grouped according to the inclusion criteria.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All consenting patients who arrive for glaucoma management appointments for objective(s) 2.1.1, 2.2.2
- Patient groups arriving for glaucoma management that will be targeted for enrollment include: glaucoma suspect patients, those with cataracts, optic atrophy, macular degeneration, macular pathology, and vascular diseases of the retina
You may not qualify if:
- Those who are unwilling or unable to provide consent
- Those for which English is not their first language
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Eugene and Marilyn Glick Eye Institute
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
MASOOD MOHAMMADI, MD
Indiana University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor of Clinical Ophthalmology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 11, 2026
First Posted
August 14, 2026
Study Start
February 7, 2025
Primary Completion
January 16, 2026
Study Completion
January 16, 2026
Last Updated
August 14, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share