Surgical Treatment for Gingival Recessions After Orthodontic Treatment
Improvement of Surgical Approaches for the Management of Gingival Recessions in Patients After Orthodontic Treatment
1 other identifier
interventional
75
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Modification of the periodontal soft tissue phenotype and coverage of exposed root surfaces in patients who have undergone orthodontic treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Sep 2026
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 9, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 13, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2027
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2027
August 13, 2026
August 1, 2026
1 year
August 9, 2026
August 9, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Complete root coverage (CRC)
Complete defect coverage was calculated as the percentage of patients with defects having complete coverage achieved as the gingival margin at cemento-enamel junction or coronal level.
12 months
Root coverage esthetic score (RES)
Root coverage esthetic score (RES) was used as a scoring system to assess the esthetic outcomes following root coverage procedures on Miller Class I \& II gingival recession defects through the evaluation of clinical cases. Gingival margin level, marginal tissue contour, soft tissue texture, mucogingival junction alignment and gingival color were evaluated without magnification. Zero, 3 and 6 points were used for the evaluation of the position of the gingival margin, whereas a score 0 or 1 point was used for each of the other variables.
12 months
Mean root coverage
Mean root coverage refers to the average amount of exposed tooth root that becomes covered again by gum tissue after periodontal treatment for gum recession, calculated as a percentage or millimeters. It is used to evaluate how successful the treatment is in restoring gum coverage, improving aesthetics, and protecting the root surface.
12 months
Patient satisfaction score
Each patient was questioned about his/her satisfaction with regard to the following patient-centered criteria: Root coverage attained, relief from dentinal hypersensitivity, color of gums, shape and contour of gums, surgical procedure in terms of pain during surgery and the discomfort experienced related to the duration of the procedure and handling by the operator, post surgical phase in terms of the pain, swelling, and postoperative complications; and cost effectiveness in terms of the time and money spent for the treatment. Patient satisfaction was assessed using a three-point rating scale: fully satisfied (3 points); satisfied (2 points); and unsatisfied (1 point).
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Plaque Index
12 months
Gingival Index
12 months
Bleeding on Probing
12 months
Probing Depth
12 months
Clinical Attachment Level
12 months
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Group I: Coronally advanced flap and a de-epithelialized soft tissue graft.
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in Group I who have completed orthodontic treatment will receive a coronally advanced flap and a de-epithelialized soft tissue graft to modify the periodontal soft tissue phenotype and cover exposed root surfaces caused by gingival recession.Evaluation of the effectiveness of coronally advanced flap combined with a de-epithelialized soft tissue graft in the management of multiple gingival recessions (Cairo classification RT1 and RT2 ≥ 2 mm).
Coronally advanced flap and a subepithelial connective tissue graft.
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in Group II will receive a coronally advanced flap and a subepithelial connective tissue graft for the same purpose. Evaluation of the effectiveness of coronally advanced flap combined with a subepithelial connective tissue graft in the management of multiple gingival recessions (Cairo classification RT1 and RT2 ≥ 2 mm).
Coronally advanced flap and Mucoderm soft tissue collagen graft.
EXPERIMENTALPatients in Group III will receive a coronally advanced flap and a Mucoderm soft tissue collagen graft. Evaluation of the effectiveness of coronally advanced flap combined with a Mucoderm soft tissue collagen graft in the management of multiple gingival recessions (Cairo classification RT1 and RT2 ≥ 2 mm). In all three groups, surgical interventions will be performed after completion of orthodontic treatment. Gingival thickness will be evaluated before treatment and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Root coverage, esthetic parameters, and patient satisfaction will be assessed 12 months after treatment.
Interventions
Evaluation of the effectiveness of coronally advanced flap combined with a de-epithelialized soft tissue graft in the management of multiple gingival recessions (Cairo classification RT1 and RT2 ≥ 2 mm).
Evaluation of the effectiveness of coronally advanced flap combined with a subepithelial connective tissue graft in the management of multiple gingival recessions (Cairo classification RT1 and RT2 ≥ 2 mm).
Evaluation of the effectiveness of coronally advanced flap combined with a Mucoderm soft tissue collagen graft in the management of multiple gingival recessions (Cairo classification RT1 and RT2 ≥ 2 mm).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Systemically healthy patients
- RT1 and RT2 gingival recession defects according to the Cairo classification, with recession depth ≥ 2 mm
- Completed orthodontic treatment
- Aged between 18 and 70
You may not qualify if:
- Smokers
- Pregnancy
- Poor adherence to oral hygiene practices
- Refusal to participate in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Aziz Aliyev Azerbaijan State Advanced Training Institute for Doctors
Baku, Azerbaijan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- A total of 75 participants will be randomly allocated to the treatment groups using a computer-generated randomization sequence by an independent individual not involved in the study. Allocation concealment will be ensured through the use of sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes. Each envelope will contain the assigned treatment for a specific participant. Both the participants and the investigator will remain blinded to the group allocation prior to the surgical intervention. The envelope will be opened by the surgeon immediately before the procedure, at which point the assigned technique will be revealed. Outcome assessment will be performed by an independent examiner blinded to the treatment allocation.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Researcher
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 9, 2026
First Posted
August 13, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
September 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2027
Last Updated
August 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-08