NCT07752992

Brief Summary

This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the Conquer Fear Carer Brief, a three-session psychological intervention targeting fear of cancer progression among caregivers of patients with metastatic prostate cancer.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
14

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
18mo left

Started Jun 2026

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress9%
Jun 2026Feb 2028

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 24, 2026

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 15, 2026

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 7, 2026

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2027

Expected
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2028

Last Updated

August 7, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

April 24, 2026

Last Update Submit

August 5, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Fear of Cancer ProgressionCaregiversMetacognitive therapyFeasibilityOnline-delivered psychological therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (7)

  • Intervention feasibility: Treatment dropout rate

    Treatment dropout is defined as attending fewer than two of the three sessions and not completing the post-intervention (Time 2) questionnaire. Feasibility will be indicated by a dropout rate of \<30%.

    Post-treatment approximately 7 weeks after baseline (Time 2)

  • Intervention feasibility: Consent rate

    Consent rate among eligible caregivers screened for participation will be evaluated. Feasibility will be indicated by a consent rate \> 50%.

    Baseline (Time 0)

  • Intervention feasibility: Successfull recruitment

    The number of included participants will be recorded. Feasibility will be indicated by the recruitment of 14 caregivers within the defined study period.

    Baseline (Time 0)

  • Intervention feasibility: Change in fear of cancer progression from pre-intervention (Time 1) to post-intervention (Time 2) and follow-up (Time 3)

    Participant-reported fear of cancer progression will be assessed in the beginning of each session using the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory Short Form (FCRI-SF), adapted to measure fear of cancer progression in caregivers of patients with cancer. The FCRI-SF is a 9-item measure rated on a scale from 0 to 4, with total scores ranging from 0 to 45. Higher scores indicate greater fear of cancer progression. Feasibility will be indicated by stability or decrease throughout the defined time frame.

    Follow-up approximately 22 weeks after baseline (Time 3)

  • Intervention Feasibility: Intervention delivery fidelity

    Therapist adherence to key intervention principles (i.e., delivery of core therapeutic elements as intended) will be rated on a 0-2 scale. A random sample of 20% of sessions will be independently rated based on video recordings.

    Post-treatment approximately 7 weeks after baseline (Time 2)

  • Intervention acceptability: Retrospective satisfaction

    Participant-reported treatment satisfaction will be assessed using the 8-item Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ). Items are rated on a scale from 1 to 4, with total scores ranging from 8 to 32. Higher scores indicate greater treatment satisfaction. Acceptability will be indicated by a mean sum score of ≥20.

    Post-treatment approximately 7 weeks after baseline (Time 2)

  • Intervention acceptability: Negative effects

    Participant-reported negative effects will be assessed using the 20-item Negative Effects Questionnaire (NEQ). First, respondents indicate whether each negative effect occurred during treatment using a yes/no format. Second, they rate the severity of each endorsed negative effect on a scale from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater severity. Third, respondents attribute each negative effect either to "the treatment I received" or to "other circumstances". Acceptability will be indicated by an absence of serious adverse events attributed to the intervention.

    Post-treatment approximately 7 weeks after baseline (Time 2)

Secondary Outcomes (14)

  • Anxiety

    Follow-up approximately 22 weeks after baseline (Time 3)

  • Cancer-specific distress

    Follow-up approximately 22 weeks after baseline (Time 3)

  • Well-being

    Follow-up approximately 22 weeks after baseline (Time 3)

  • Caregiver reaction

    Follow-up approximately 22 weeks after baseline (Time 3)

  • Sleep health

    Follow-up approximately 22 weeks after baseline (Time 3)

  • +9 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Conquer Fear Carer Brief

EXPERIMENTAL

Metacognitive therapy delivered individually over 3 sessions.

Behavioral: Conquer Fear Carer Brief

Interventions

The intervention is delivered online by a psychologist or a master's-level student in psychology over three sessions during a 3-4-week period. The three sessions are structured to enhance participants' abilities in Detached Mindfulness (DM), a cognitive technique used in Metacognitive Therapy that involves perceiving thoughts and feelings as passing events without engaging with them. In Session 1, DM is introduced through dialogue, examples, and exercises. In session 2, Attention Training (AT) is introduced to support participants' ability to engage in DM through dialogue, examples, and exercises. In Session 3, DM and AT are reviewed and discussed depending on participants' needs, and their future application are discussed. Participants apply the introduced techniques at home between sessions through assigned homework.

Conquer Fear Carer Brief

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Self-identified caregiver of a patient with metastatic, non-curable prostate cancer
  • Aged ≥18 years
  • Score in the clinical range (≥22) on the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory Short Form (FCRI-SF)
  • Score in the clinical range (\>15) on the Brief Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ)
  • Sufficient proficiency in Danish
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Stable or no use of antidepressant or anxiolytic medication (i.e., stable dosage for ≥6 weeks)
  • Able to participate in online-delivered therapy via a computer with a video camera

You may not qualify if:

  • Severe psychiatric conditions (e.g., major depression) that would make participation in the intervention inappropriate
  • Currently enrolled in psychotherapy or counseling targeting the same problem
  • Substance abuse or dependence judged to require treatment
  • Suicide risk requiring immediate psychiatric intervention or hospitalization

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University

Aarhus, 8000, Denmark

RECRUITING

Central Study Contacts

Cecilie R Buskbjerg, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: Within-subject repeated-measures design including a pre-intervention waiting period
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Postdoc

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 24, 2026

First Posted

August 7, 2026

Study Start

June 15, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2028

Last Updated

August 7, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared due to the sensitive nature of the data and the associated risk of re-identification, even after de-identification. Data sharing is not consistent with the informed consent provided by participants. Only aggregate data may be made available for research purposes upon reasonable request.

Locations