Electrocautery Versus Scalpel Incision in Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty
ELECT-BLEPH
Comparison of Electrocautery and Scalpel for Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty Incision: A Prospective Randomized Contralateral Comparative Study
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This prospective randomized contralateral comparative study aims to compare electrocautery and scalpel incision techniques in upper eyelid blepharoplasty. Each participant undergoes bilateral upper eyelid blepharoplasty, with one eyelid randomized to electrocautery incision and the contralateral eyelid to scalpel incision. Outcomes include postoperative pain, edema, ecchymosis, scar quality, wound healing, patient satisfaction, and surgeon satisfaction. The study is designed to determine whether electrocautery provides comparable or superior clinical outcomes while maintaining safety and surgical effectiveness.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 15, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 24, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 24, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 2, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 6, 2026
CompletedAugust 6, 2026
August 1, 2026
7 months
August 2, 2026
August 2, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Skin excision time
Time required for skin incision and excision, measured separately for each eyelid from the initial skin incision to completion of planned skin excision using a digital stopwatch. Lower values indicate greater operative efficiency.
During surgery (intraoperative)
Intraoperative bleeding
Intraoperative bleeding was assessed separately for each eyelid by measuring the total number of cotton-tipped applicators used for hemostasis during skin incision and tissue dissection. A lower number indicated less intraoperative bleeding.
During surgery (intraoperative)
Postoperative ecchymosis
Postoperative ecchymosis was assessed from standardized photographs using ImageJ software. The ecchymotic area was measured in square centimeters and graded on a 5-point scale (0 = no ecchymosis; 1 = ≤2 cm²; 2 = \>2-4 cm²; 3 = \>4-6 cm²; 4 = \>6 cm²). Lower scores indicated less postoperative ecchymosis.
Postoperative day 1, week 1, month 1, month 3, and month 6
Postoperative edema
Postoperative eyelid edema was evaluated using a standardized 5-point grading scale (0 = none; 1 = minimal; 2 = edema extending to the iris; 3 = edema covering the iris; 4 = upper and lower eyelids swollen shut). Lower scores indicated less postoperative edema.
Postoperative day 1, week 1, month 1, month 3, and month 6
Scar visibility
Scar visibility was evaluated by masked observers using standardized postoperative photographs and graded on a 4-point ordinal scale (1 = invisible; 2 = mildly visible; 3 = moderately visible; 4 = highly visible). Lower scores indicated better scar appearance.
Postoperative months 1, 3, and 6
Hyperpigmentation and hypopigmentation
Postoperative hypopigmentation and hyperpigmentation were evaluated separately for each eyelid using standardized postoperative photographs and recorded as present or absent by masked observers.
Postoperative months 1, 3, and 6
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Corneal epithelial staining
Postoperative day 1, week 1, month 1, month 3, and month 6
Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)
Postoperative day 1, week 1, month 1, month 3, and month 6
Study Arms (2)
Electrocautery incision
EXPERIMENTALUpper eyelid blepharoplasty performed using electrocautery incision.
Scalpel incision
ACTIVE COMPARATORUpper eyelid blepharoplasty performed using scalpel skin incision.
Interventions
Skin incision performed using electrocautery during upper eyelid blepharoplasty.
Skin incision performed using a scalpel during upper eyelid blepharoplasty.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults aged 18 years or older.
- Diagnosis of upper eyelid dermatochalasis.
- Scheduled to undergo bilateral upper eyelid blepharoplasty.
- Ability to provide written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Previous eyelid surgery.
- History of eyelid trauma.
- Blepharochalasis syndrome.
- Congenital eyelid anomalies.
- Coagulation disorders.
- Concurrent ptosis requiring surgical correction.
- Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent or comply with study follow-up.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Health Sciences Beyoğlu Eye Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants were masked to the intervention assigned to each eyelid. Postoperative outcomes were evaluated independently by two masked ophthalmic surgeons using standardized photographs. In case of disagreement, a third independent masked investigator determined the final score. The operating surgeon was not masked.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Ophthalmologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 2, 2026
First Posted
August 6, 2026
Study Start
September 15, 2025
Primary Completion
April 24, 2026
Study Completion
April 24, 2026
Last Updated
August 6, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share