NCT07749846

Brief Summary

This prospective randomized contralateral comparative study aims to compare electrocautery and scalpel incision techniques in upper eyelid blepharoplasty. Each participant undergoes bilateral upper eyelid blepharoplasty, with one eyelid randomized to electrocautery incision and the contralateral eyelid to scalpel incision. Outcomes include postoperative pain, edema, ecchymosis, scar quality, wound healing, patient satisfaction, and surgeon satisfaction. The study is designed to determine whether electrocautery provides comparable or superior clinical outcomes while maintaining safety and surgical effectiveness.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 15, 2025

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 24, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 24, 2026

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 2, 2026

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 6, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

August 6, 2026

Status Verified

August 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

August 2, 2026

Last Update Submit

August 2, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Upper eyelid blepharoplastyElectrocauteryScalpelRandomized controlled trialEyelid surgeryScar healingWound healingOculoplastic surgeryContralateral study

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Skin excision time

    Time required for skin incision and excision, measured separately for each eyelid from the initial skin incision to completion of planned skin excision using a digital stopwatch. Lower values indicate greater operative efficiency.

    During surgery (intraoperative)

  • Intraoperative bleeding

    Intraoperative bleeding was assessed separately for each eyelid by measuring the total number of cotton-tipped applicators used for hemostasis during skin incision and tissue dissection. A lower number indicated less intraoperative bleeding.

    During surgery (intraoperative)

  • Postoperative ecchymosis

    Postoperative ecchymosis was assessed from standardized photographs using ImageJ software. The ecchymotic area was measured in square centimeters and graded on a 5-point scale (0 = no ecchymosis; 1 = ≤2 cm²; 2 = \>2-4 cm²; 3 = \>4-6 cm²; 4 = \>6 cm²). Lower scores indicated less postoperative ecchymosis.

    Postoperative day 1, week 1, month 1, month 3, and month 6

  • Postoperative edema

    Postoperative eyelid edema was evaluated using a standardized 5-point grading scale (0 = none; 1 = minimal; 2 = edema extending to the iris; 3 = edema covering the iris; 4 = upper and lower eyelids swollen shut). Lower scores indicated less postoperative edema.

    Postoperative day 1, week 1, month 1, month 3, and month 6

  • Scar visibility

    Scar visibility was evaluated by masked observers using standardized postoperative photographs and graded on a 4-point ordinal scale (1 = invisible; 2 = mildly visible; 3 = moderately visible; 4 = highly visible). Lower scores indicated better scar appearance.

    Postoperative months 1, 3, and 6

  • Hyperpigmentation and hypopigmentation

    Postoperative hypopigmentation and hyperpigmentation were evaluated separately for each eyelid using standardized postoperative photographs and recorded as present or absent by masked observers.

    Postoperative months 1, 3, and 6

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Corneal epithelial staining

    Postoperative day 1, week 1, month 1, month 3, and month 6

  • Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)

    Postoperative day 1, week 1, month 1, month 3, and month 6

Study Arms (2)

Electrocautery incision

EXPERIMENTAL

Upper eyelid blepharoplasty performed using electrocautery incision.

Procedure: Electrocautery incision

Scalpel incision

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Upper eyelid blepharoplasty performed using scalpel skin incision.

Procedure: Scalpel incision

Interventions

Skin incision performed using electrocautery during upper eyelid blepharoplasty.

Electrocautery incision

Skin incision performed using a scalpel during upper eyelid blepharoplasty.

Scalpel incision

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults aged 18 years or older.
  • Diagnosis of upper eyelid dermatochalasis.
  • Scheduled to undergo bilateral upper eyelid blepharoplasty.
  • Ability to provide written informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Previous eyelid surgery.
  • History of eyelid trauma.
  • Blepharochalasis syndrome.
  • Congenital eyelid anomalies.
  • Coagulation disorders.
  • Concurrent ptosis requiring surgical correction.
  • Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent or comply with study follow-up.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Health Sciences Beyoğlu Eye Training and Research Hospital

Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cutis Laxa

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Skin Diseases, GeneticGenetic Diseases, InbornCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and AbnormalitiesConnective Tissue DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesSkin Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Participants were masked to the intervention assigned to each eyelid. Postoperative outcomes were evaluated independently by two masked ophthalmic surgeons using standardized photographs. In case of disagreement, a third independent masked investigator determined the final score. The operating surgeon was not masked.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Each participant underwent bilateral upper eyelid blepharoplasty. One eyelid was randomized to electrocautery incision and the contralateral eyelid to scalpel incision, allowing each participant to serve as his or her own control.
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Ophthalmologist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 2, 2026

First Posted

August 6, 2026

Study Start

September 15, 2025

Primary Completion

April 24, 2026

Study Completion

April 24, 2026

Last Updated

August 6, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations