NCT07749274

Brief Summary

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have revolutionized perioperative management by implementing evidence-based, patient-centered strategies that improve clinical outcomes, shorten hospital length of stay, and reduce healthcare costs. In cardiac surgery, ERAS has facilitated the adoption of fast-track cardiac anesthesia (FTCA), which aims to achieve early extubation within 6-8 hours after surgery while maintaining patient safety. Compared with conventional high-dose opioid anesthesia, FTCA has been associated with shorter intensive care unit (ICU) stays, earlier mobilization, faster recovery, and comparable rates of mortality and major postoperative complications. Despite these advantages, opioids remain the cornerstone of perioperative analgesia in cardiac surgery. Their use is associated with respiratory depression, delayed extubation, postoperative nausea and vomiting, ileus, urinary retention, delirium, opioid-induced hyperalgesia, and increased healthcare costs, highlighting the need for opioid-sparing anesthetic strategies. Dexmedetomidine, a highly selective α2-adrenergic agonist, provides sedation, analgesia, and sympatholysis without clinically significant respiratory depression. In cardiac surgery, it improves hemodynamic stability, reduces perioperative opioid requirements, preserves spontaneous ventilation, and may decrease postoperative delirium, making it particularly suitable for fast-track extubation protocols. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has emerged as a safe and effective regional analgesic technique. Compared with thoracic epidural and paravertebral blocks, ESPB offers a lower risk of complications, is technically straightforward, and provides effective bilateral analgesia for cardiac surgery. Randomized studies have demonstrated substantial reductions in intraoperative opioid consumption, improved postoperative pain control, and prolonged opioid-free analgesia. Minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS), characterized by reduced surgical trauma and faster recovery compared with conventional sternotomy, provides an ideal setting to evaluate opioid-sparing anesthetic strategies. Combining dexmedetomidine with ultrasound-guided bilateral ESPB may optimize perioperative analgesia, facilitate early extubation, reduce opioid-related adverse effects, and enhance postoperative recovery, supporting ERAS principles in contemporary cardiac surgery.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
26mo left

Started Sep 2026

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 1, 2026

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 6, 2026

Completed
26 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2026

Expected
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2028

2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2028

Last Updated

August 6, 2026

Status Verified

August 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

August 1, 2026

Last Update Submit

August 1, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Time to Tracheal Extubation

    Time from arrival in the cardiothoracic intensive care unit (ICU) (connection to the ICU ventilator) until successful removal of the endotracheal tube. Successful extubation is defined as no requirement for reintubation

    From ICU admission until successful extubation (within 48 hours postoperatively)

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Total Intraoperative Opioid Consumption

    During surgery

  • Postoperative Opioid Consumption

    2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after extubation.

Study Arms (2)

Fast-Track Anesthesia (Dexmedetomidine + ESPB)

EXPERIMENTAL

participants receive a fast-track anesthesia protocol consisting of intravenous dexmedetomidine combined with ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block (ESPB), with opioid-sparing intraoperative anesthesia and standardized perioperative care.

Drug: DexmedetomidineProcedure: Ultrasound-Guided Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB)

conventional Opioid-Based Anesthesia

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants receive conventional general anesthesia using fentanyl-based opioid analgesia according to the institutional standard protocol, together with standardized perioperative and postoperative care.

Drug: Fentanyl

Interventions

Intravenous dexmedetomidine administered as part of a fast-track anesthesia protocol. Patients receive a loading dose of 0.5-1.0 µg/kg over 10 minutes before intubation, followed by an intraoperative infusion of 0.2-0.7 µg/kg/h, adjusted according to hemodynamic response. During cardiopulmonary bypass, the infusion is reduced to 0.2 µg/kg/h. Rescue fentanyl (0.5 µg/kg IV) is permitted only if predefined hemodynamic criteria are met.

Fast-Track Anesthesia (Dexmedetomidine + ESPB)

Ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block performed after induction of anesthesia and before surgical incision. A total of 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine is injected into the erector spinae plane on each side at the T5 level using an in-plane ultrasound-guided technique. The procedure is performed as part of an opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia strategy.

Fast-Track Anesthesia (Dexmedetomidine + ESPB)

Conventional opioid-based general anesthesia using intravenous fentanyl. A dose of 5 µg/kg is administered during induction followed by an intraoperative infusion of 1-3 µg/kg/h, titrated according to hemodynamic parameters and institutional practice. Standardized perioperative management is otherwise identical to the experimental group.

conventional Opioid-Based Anesthesia

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18-65 years.
  • Scheduled for elective minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS), including:
  • Minimally invasive mitral valve repair or replacement. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement. Atrial septal defect (ASD) closure. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥45%. EuroSCORE II \<4%. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II or III. Body mass index (BMI) 18-35 kg/m². Ability to understand the study procedures and provide written informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Emergency cardiac surgery. BMI \<18 or \>35 kg/m². Severe pulmonary disease (COPD requiring home oxygen therapy or FEV1 \<50% predicted).
  • Obstructive sleep apnea or anticipated difficult airway. Preoperative intubation, cardiogenic shock, or need for preoperative inotropic/vasopressor support.
  • Known allergy or contraindication to dexmedetomidine, fentanyl, bupivacaine, propofol, or other study medications.
  • Severe hepatic impairment or renal failure requiring dialysis (creatinine clearance \<30 mL/min).
  • Chronic opioid use (\>3 months) or chronic pain requiring long-term analgesics. Contraindications to erector spinae plane block (coagulopathy, platelet count \<100,000/µL, INR \>1.5, anticoagulant therapy, infection at the injection site, or patient refusal).
  • Baseline bradycardia (heart rate \<50 beats/min) or second-/third-degree atrioventricular block without a functioning pacemaker.
  • Known substance abuse disorder

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Assiut university hospital

Asyut, Ass, 71515, Egypt

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

DexmedetomidineFentanyl

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ImidazolesAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsPiperidines

Central Study Contacts

Abu Elhasan A Rezk, M.B.B.Ch.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
Masking Details
Participants and outcome assessors will be blinded to treatment allocation. Randomization will be performed using a concealed allocation sequence. In the intervention group, patients will receive ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block (ESPB) with dexmedetomidine-based fast-track anesthesia. To maintain participant blinding, patients in the control group will receive a sham subcutaneous saline injection after induction. The anesthesiologist performing the block and administering anesthesia will not be blinded because of the nature of the interventions. Data analysis will be performed using coded treatment assignments whenever feasible.
Purpose
SCREENING
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This is a prospective, single-center, randomized, parallel-group, patient- and outcome-assessor-blinded superiority trial. Eligible patients undergoing elective minimally invasive cardiac surgery will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either a fast-track anesthesia protocol consisting of dexmedetomidine combined with ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block (ESPB) or conventional opioid-based general anesthesia. Apart from the anesthetic intervention, all participants will receive standardized perioperative care, including surgical management, cardiopulmonary bypass protocols, postoperative analgesia, and fast-track extubation criteria. The study will compare the effects of the two anesthetic strategies on extubation time, perioperative opioid consumption, postoperative pain, ICU and hospital length of stay, and perioperative complications. This description is consistent with your study design.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
assistant lecturer

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 1, 2026

First Posted

August 6, 2026

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2028

Last Updated

August 6, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

de-identified individual participant data (IPD) will be made available upon reasonable request for legitimate scientific research purposes, subject to approval by the principal investigator and the Institutional Review Board (IRB). Data sharing will comply with institutional policies and applicable ethical and legal requirements. No information that could directly or indirectly identify study participants will be shared. Access to the data will be granted only after execution of an appropriate data-sharing agreement to ensure the confidentiality and privacy of participants.

Locations