Comparing Local Anesthetic Injections to Nerve Blocks for Pain Control After Total Knee Replacement
LIA-PNB-TKA
Comparison of Intraarticular Application of Local Anesthetics Versus Peripheral Regional Anesthesia in Patients With Total Arthroplasty of the Knee (K-TEP)
1 other identifier
interventional
78
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Why are we doing this study? People who have knee replacement surgery often feel pain afterward. Doctors use different methods to control this pain. One method is an injection of numbing medicine directly into the knee during surgery, called local infiltration analgesia (LIA). Another method uses a thin tube (catheter) placed near nerves in the leg to continuously deliver numbing medicine, called a nerve block. This study compares these two pain control methods after knee replacement surgery, to find out whether the injection method (LIA) works at least as well as the nerve block method for controlling pain. Who can take part in this study? Adults aged 18 to 90 years who need a first-time (primary) knee replacement because of knee arthritis can take part. Participants must be able to walk before surgery, be in generally stable health, and be able to give informed consent. People with a knee injury (rather than arthritis), people who use a wheelchair, and people unable to give consent were not included. What happens during this study? 78 participants were randomly assigned, like a coin flip, to receive either the injection into the knee (LIA) or the nerve block through a catheter for pain relief after surgery. Both groups also received the same standard pain medicines by mouth or vein as needed. Researchers measured pain levels using a 0-10 pain scale before surgery and at 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours afterward. They also measured knee movement (range of motion), how much extra pain medicine was needed, and how satisfied participants were with their pain control. The study took place at one hospital, the Elisabethinen Hospital in Klagenfurt, Austria, between June 2025 and January 2026.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 31, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 31, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 30, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 4, 2026
CompletedAugust 4, 2026
July 1, 2026
8 months
July 30, 2026
July 30, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Postoperative Pain Intensity at 48 Hours (VAS Score)
Pain intensity measured with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), assessed at rest, at night, and during mobilization 48 hours after total knee arthroplasty. This measure was used to test non-inferiority of LIA versus peripheral regional (femoral/sciatic nerve block) anesthesia against a pre-specified non-inferiority margin.
8 hours postoperatively
Postoperative Pain Intensity at 48 Hours (VAS Score)
Pain intensity measured with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), assessed at rest, at night, and during mobilization 48 hours after total knee arthroplasty. This measure was used to test non-inferiority of LIA versus peripheral regional (femoral/sciatic nerve block) anesthesia against a pre-specified non-inferiority margin.
48 hours postoperatively
Study Arms (2)
Local Infiltration Analgesia (LIA)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received intraoperative periarticular local infiltration analgesia consisting of 200 mL ropivacaine (2 mg/mL, first 50 mL discarded), 30 mg ketorolac, and 0.5 mg epinephrine, injected during total knee arthroplasty. All participants additionally received the standardized postoperative oral/intravenous analgesic regimen (diclofenac, hydromorphone, metamizole, paracetamol as needed).
Peripheral Regional Anesthesia (Femoral and Sciatic Nerve Block)
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants received continuous femoral and sciatic nerve block via perineural catheters. An initial local anesthetic bolus was followed by continuous ropivacaine 0.2% infusion for 48 hours postoperatively (5 mL/h for the first 24 hours, then reduced to 3 mL/h), with patient-controlled boluses available. The same standardized postoperative oral/intravenous analgesic regimen as the LIA group was administered.
Interventions
Continuous peripheral regional anesthesia via ultrasound-guided femoral and sciatic nerve catheters, placed intraoperatively. Under general anesthesia, each catheter received an initial bolus of 15 mL mepivacaine 1.5% plus 10 mL ropivacaine 0.375%; under spinal anesthesia, an initial 15 mL normal saline (0.9%) test bolus confirmed catheter position, followed by 10 mL ropivacaine 0.375% once sensory block began to wear off. A continuous perineural infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% was then maintained via infusion pump for 48 hours postoperatively: 5 mL/h for the first 24 hours, reduced to 3 mL/h thereafter. Patients could additionally self-administer a 5 mL bolus every 30 minutes as needed. Catheters and the infusion pump were removed at 48 hours postoperatively.
Periarticular local infiltration analgesia administered intraoperatively during total knee arthroplasty, comprising 150 mL ropivacaine 2 mg/mL (from a 200 mL preparation, first 50 mL discarded), 30 mg ketorolac (1 mL of 30 mg/mL solution), and 0.5 mg epinephrine hydrochloride (0.5 mL of 1 mg/mL solution). The combined solution was injected periarticularly by the operating surgeon as a single intraoperative dose during wound closure. Total ropivacaine dose did not exceed the maximum recommended dose of 300 mg. No repeat dosing was administered postoperatively for this arm.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 to 90 years Primary or secondary knee osteoarthritis (gonarthrosis) Scheduled for elective primary total knee arthroplasty (cruciate-retaining implant) Ambulatory prior to surgery (able to walk unassisted) American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III Able to provide written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Post-traumatic knee arthropathy (trauma-related indication for surgery) Wheelchair use / inability to ambulate preoperatively ASA physical status IV or higher Lack of capacity to provide informed consent (e.g., legal guardianship/procurator required) Planned unicompartmental (hemi-) knee arthroplasty or revision surgery Known allergy or contraindication to the study medications (ropivacaine, ketorolac, or epinephrine)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Christopher Malelead
- Elisabethinen Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Elisabethinen Krankenhaus Klagenfurt
Klagenfurt, Carinthia, 9020, Austria
Related Publications (4)
Hu B, Lin T, Yan SG, Tong SL, Yu JH, Xu JJ, Ying YM. Local Infiltration Analgesia Versus Regional Blockade for Postoperative Analgesia in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Pain Physician. 2016 May;19(4):205-14.
PMID: 27228509RESULTKerr DR, Kohan L. Local infiltration analgesia: a technique for the control of acute postoperative pain following knee and hip surgery: a case study of 325 patients. Acta Orthop. 2008 Apr;79(2):174-83. doi: 10.1080/17453670710014950.
PMID: 18484242RESULTMyles PS, Myles DB, Galagher W, Boyd D, Chew C, MacDonald N, Dennis A. Measuring acute postoperative pain using the visual analog scale: the minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Mar 1;118(3):424-429. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew466.
PMID: 28186223RESULTOlsen MF, Bjerre E, Hansen MD, Hilden J, Landler NE, Tendal B, Hrobjartsson A. Pain relief that matters to patients: systematic review of empirical studies assessing the minimum clinically important difference in acute pain. BMC Med. 2017 Feb 20;15(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0775-3.
PMID: 28215182RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr. Christopher Male ,Doctoral Candidate, Department of Sustainable Health Research, Medical University of Graz
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 30, 2026
First Posted
August 4, 2026
Study Start
June 1, 2025
Primary Completion
January 31, 2026
Study Completion
January 31, 2026
Last Updated
August 4, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data are not planned to be shared beyond the study team. In accordance with the data protection provisions of the study protocol, collected data are stored pseudonymized (no patient names) in a restricted-access institutional spreadsheet. No data-sharing infrastructure, repository, or governance process has been established for this single-center academic dissertation study.