Nebulized Lidocaine And Ketamine Before Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy
2 other identifiers
interventional
134
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The current study is looked for the comparison between nebulized lidocaine and ketamine, nebulized lidocaine, and usual lidocaine spray in the oral and nasal cavities before flexible bronchoscopy. The investigators are looking for different outcomes including mainly cough suppression during the procedure, patient tolerance and discomfort, operator and patients' satisfaction, and safety of the use of these medications especially regarding nebulized ketamine.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Sep 2024
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 14, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 3, 2026
CompletedAugust 3, 2026
July 1, 2026
6 months
July 14, 2026
July 31, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Safety of adding ketamine to lidocaine
The investigators aimed to record the systemic side effects of combined nebulization of ketamine and lidocaine especially regarding heamodynamic stability (measurement of blood pressure) just after giving the nebulization and over 2 hours.
2 hours
Efficacy of nebulized ketamine to lidocaine
The investigators aimed to measure the efficacy of combined lidocaine and ketamine vs. lidocaine alone as premedication of FOB regarding suppressing cough during the procedure using the cough score. The cough score, a simple assessment tool based on patient experience, was used to grade airway irritation from 0 (none) to 4 (severe).
2 hours
Local complication of ketamine and lidocaine
After use of the medications, local side effects were records and assessed using the verbal rating scale (VRS), a method for assessing pain, in which patients were asked to describe their pain on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).
2 hours
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Sedation effect of nebulized ketamine
2 hours
Comfort of the patient during FOB
2 hours
Patient tolerance during FOB
2 hours
Study Arms (3)
interventional A Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis group of patient were given nebulized lidacaine and ketamine before FOB.
Interventional B Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis group of patient were given nebulized lidacaine only before FOB.
Control group
PLACEBO COMPARATORThis group of patient were given lidacaine spray to the oral and nasal cavity before FOB.
Interventions
This group received nebulization of lidocaine (dose of 60 mg) and ketamine (dose of 150 mg) each in separate nebulization before FOB as premedication. The patients were followed up before (just after nebulization), during and after FOB regarding hemodynamic satbility (as measured by blood pressure), heart rate and oxygen saturation.
This group received nebulization of lidocaine (dose of 60 mg) only before FOB as premedication. The patients were followed up before, during and after FOB regarding hemodynamic satbility (measured by blood pressure), heart rate and O2 saturation.
This group received lidocaine spray (2%) alone for the oral and nasal cavities before FOB as premedication. The patients were followed up before, during and after FOB regarding hemodynamic satbility (measured by blood pressure), heart rate and O2 saturation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients were assigned for FOB for diagnostic causes as part of their usual care.
- All patients were assigned for FOB for therapeutic causes as part of their usual care.
You may not qualify if:
- unstable angina or recent myocardial infarction,
- hypoxemia that is not corrected by oxygen therapy,
- increased intracranial pressure or recent cerebrovascular stroke,
- uncontrolled uraemia,
- uncontrolled hypertension,
- current viral infections or colds,
- history of allergy to lidocaine or ketamine,
- altered mental status, or
- non-corrected coagulopathy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Alexandria University Faculty of Medicine
Alexandria, Alexandria Governorate, 21526, Egypt
Related Publications (2)
Dreher M, Cornelissen CG, Reddemann MA, Muller A, Hubel C, Muller T. Nebulized versus Standard Local Application of Lidocaine during Flexible Bronchoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Respiration. 2016;92(4):266-273. doi: 10.1159/000449135. Epub 2016 Sep 10.
PMID: 27614989RESULTDhooria S, Chaudhary S, Ram B, Sehgal IS, Muthu V, Prasad KT, Aggarwal AN, Agarwal R. A Randomized Trial of Nebulized Lignocaine, Lignocaine Spray, or Their Combination for Topical Anesthesia During Diagnostic Flexible Bronchoscopy. Chest. 2020 Jan;157(1):198-204. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.06.018. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
PMID: 31299247RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 14, 2026
First Posted
August 3, 2026
Study Start
September 1, 2024
Primary Completion
February 28, 2025
Study Completion
February 28, 2025
Last Updated
August 3, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07