Effectiveness of a Mindfulness-Based Intervention for Pain Management in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis (MPIMS).
MPIMS
1 other identifier
interventional
84
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether a mindfulness-based intervention is effective for reducing pain in adults with multiple sclerosis. It will also assess whether this intervention improves other symptoms commonly associated with pain, such as fatigue, sleep disturbances, anxiety, depression, and quality of life. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does a mindfulness-based intervention reduce pain intensity in people with multiple sclerosis?
- Does the intervention improve fatigue, sleep quality, emotional well-being, quality of life?
- Does the effectiveness of the intervention differ according to the type of pain experienced by participants? Researchers will compare a mindfulness-based intervention with an educational program to determine whether mindfulness provides additional benefits for pain management in people with multiple sclerosis. Participants will:
- Be randomly assigned to either the mindfulness intervention group or the educational control group.
- Complete assessments before the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-month and 3-month follow-up visits.
- If assigned to the mindfulness group, attend eight weekly 2.5-hour group sessions plus one 6-hour retreat, either in person or online.
- If assigned to the control group, attend two 2-hour educational sessions during the study period.
- Complete questionnaires evaluating pain, fatigue, physical function, anxiety, depression, sleep quality, quality of life, and mindfulness throughout the study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable multiple-sclerosis
Started Sep 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable multiple-sclerosis
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 26, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 3, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 2, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2027
August 3, 2026
July 1, 2026
8 months
June 26, 2026
July 30, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Intensity of pain
The intensity of pain will be assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The VAS is a self-reported measure of pain intensity in which participants rate their current pain on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.
Assessments will be performed at baseline, immediately post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention, and 3 months post-intervention.
Dimensions of pain
The dimensions of pain will be assessed using the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ). The SF-MPQ is a 15-item instrument that assesses the qualitative characteristics of pain through 11 sensory and 4 affective descriptors, each rated on a 4-point scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). Total score ranges from 0 to 45, with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity and more severe pain qualities.
Assessments will be performed at baseline, immediately post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention, and 3 months post-intervention.
Impact of pain on daily functioning
The impact of pain on daily functioning will be assessed using the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ). The PSEQ is a 10-item questionnaire designed to evaluate an individual's confidence in performing daily activities despite pain. Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all confident) to 6 (completely confident), yielding a total score from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater pain self-efficacy.
Assessments will be performed at baseline, immediately post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention, and 3 months post-intervention.
Presence of neuropathic pain
The presence of neuropathic pain will be assessed using the Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) questionnaire. The DN4 is a 10-item questionnaire consisting of 7 interview items assessing symptoms characteristic of neuropathic pain and 3 clinical examination items evaluating hypoesthesia to touch, hypoesthesia to pinprick, and pain evoked by brushing. Each item is scored as 0 (absent) or 1 (present), yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 10. A total score of ≥4 is indicative of neuropathic pain.
Assessments will be performed at baseline, immediately post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention, and 3 months post-intervention.
Emotional and cognitive impact of pain
The emotional and cognitive impact of pain will be assessed using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). The PCS is a 13-item self-administered questionnaire that assesses pain catastrophizing by evaluating negative thoughts and emotional responses associated with pain. It comprises three subscales: rumination (4 items), magnification (3 items), and helplessness (6 items). Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time), yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating greater levels of pain catastrophizing.
Assessments will be performed at baseline, immediately post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention, and 3 months post-intervention.
Severity of pain
The severity of pain will be assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF). The BPI-SF is a self-report questionnaire that assesses pain severity, pain interference with daily activities, and pain characteristics. It consists of 9 items. Pain severity is assessed using four items rated on an 11-point numeric rating scale (0 = "no pain" to 10 = "pain as bad as you can imagine"), while pain interference is assessed using seven items rated from 0 ("does not interfere") to 10 ("completely interferes"). Higher scores indicate greater pain severity.
Assessments will be performed at baseline, immediately post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention, and 3 months post-intervention.
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Physical function
Assessments will be performed at baseline, immediately post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention, and 3 months post-intervention.
Fatigue
Assessments will be performed at baseline, immediately post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention, and 3 months post-intervention.
Depressive symptoms
Assessments will be performed at baseline, immediately post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention, and 3 months post-intervention.
Anxiety
Assessments will be performed at baseline, immediately post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention, and 3 months post-intervention.
Sleep disturbance
Assessments will be performed at baseline, immediately post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention, and 3 months post-intervention.
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Mindfulness Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive a Mindfulness intervention specifically designed for pain management in people with multiple sclerosis.
Educational Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will receive an active educational intervention for pain management consisting of two group sessions
Interventions
Group-based mindfulness intervention specifically designed for pain management in people with multiple sclerosis. The program includes pain neuroscience education, cognitive pain management strategies, guided meditation, active visualization techniques, mindfulness-based stretching exercises, and mindful yoga.The intervention consists of eight weekly group sessions lasting 2.5 hours each, followed by a 6-hour mindfulness retreat. Participants may attend the sessions either in person or online.
Educational intervention consists of two 2-hour group sessions on multiple sclerosis and pain management, delivered once every 4 weeks during the 8-week intervention period.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults aged 18 to 80 years.
- Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis with an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score between 1.0 and 7.0.
- Presence of pain.
- Ability to provide written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Severe cognitive impairment.
- Diagnosed psychiatric disorders (e.g., schizophrenia or personality disorders).
- Participation in another non-pharmacological intervention specifically aimed at pain management.
- If receiving stable pain medication, treatment must have been maintained for at least 4 months before enrollment.
- Unwillingness to provide informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hopsital Universitario Virgen Macarena
Seville, Sevilla, 41009, Spain
Related Publications (24)
Cebolla A, García-Palacios A, Soler J, Guillen V, Baños R, Botella C. Propiedades psicométricas de la validación es-pañola del Cuestionario de las Cinco Facetas de Mindful-ness (FFMQ). European Journal of Psychiatry. 2012;26(2):118-126.
BACKGROUNDCebolla A, Luciano JV, DeMarzo MP, Navarro-Gil M, Campayo JG. Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) in patients with fibromyalgia. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Jan 14;11:6. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-6.
PMID: 23317306BACKGROUND23. Macías Fernández JA, Royuela Rico A. La versión española del Índice de Calidad de Sueño de Pittsburgh. Informaciones Psiquiátricas. 1996;(146):465-472.
BACKGROUNDFull KM, Malhotra A, Crist K, Moran K, Kerr J. Assessing psychometric properties of the PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Scale in older adults in independent-living and continuing care retirement communities. Sleep Health. 2019 Feb;5(1):18-22. doi: 10.1016/j.sleh.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Oct 28.
PMID: 30670160BACKGROUNDGarcia-Campayo J, Zamorano E, Ruiz MA, Pardo A, Perez-Paramo M, Lopez-Gomez V, Freire O, Rejas J. Cultural adaptation into Spanish of the generalized anxiety disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale as a screening tool. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Jan 20;8:8. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-8.
PMID: 20089179BACKGROUNDBeswick E, Quigley S, Macdonald P, Patrick S, Colville S, Chandran S, Connick P. The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) as a tool to screen for depression in people with multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional validation study. BMC Psychol. 2022 Nov 28;10(1):281. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00949-8.
PMID: 36443880BACKGROUNDMunguia-Izquierdo D, Segura-Jimenez V, Camiletti-Moiron D, Pulido-Martos M, Alvarez-Gallardo IC, Romero A, Aparicio VA, Carbonell-Baeza A, Delgado-Fernandez M. Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory: Spanish adaptation and psychometric properties for fibromyalgia patients. The Al-Andalus study. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2012 Nov-Dec;30(6 Suppl 74):94-102. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
PMID: 23261007BACKGROUNDGarcia Campayo J, Rodero B, Alda M, Sobradiel N, Montero J, Moreno S. [Validation of the Spanish version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in fibromyalgia]. Med Clin (Barc). 2008 Oct 18;131(13):487-92. doi: 10.1157/13127277. Spanish.
PMID: 19007576BACKGROUNDAta E, Ozsoy-Unubol T, Demir S. Evaluation of Neuropathic Extremity Pain in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2019 Oct 4;58(3):213-216. doi: 10.29399/npa.24802. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34526844BACKGROUNDLazaro C, Caseras X, Whizar-Lugo VM, Wenk R, Baldioceda F, Bernal R, Ovalle A, Torrubia R, Banos JE. Psychometric properties of a Spanish version of the McGill Pain Questionnaire in several Spanish-speaking countries. Clin J Pain. 2001 Dec;17(4):365-74. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200112000-00012.
PMID: 11783818BACKGROUNDEhde DM, Nitsch KP, Smiley JP. Measurement characteristics and clinical utility of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form for individuals with multiple sclerosis. Rehabil Psychol. 2015 Nov;60(4):365-6. doi: 10.1037/rep0000065.
PMID: 26618216BACKGROUNDTreede RD, Rief W, Barke A, Aziz Q, Bennett MI, Benoliel R, Cohen M, Evers S, Finnerup NB, First MB, Giamberardino MA, Kaasa S, Kosek E, Lavand'homme P, Nicholas M, Perrot S, Scholz J, Schug S, Smith BH, Svensson P, Vlaeyen JWS, Wang SJ. A classification of chronic pain for ICD-11. Pain. 2015 Jun;156(6):1003-1007. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000160. No abstract available.
PMID: 25844555BACKGROUNDKos D, Raeymaekers J, Van Remoortel A, D'hooghe MB, Nagels G, D'Haeseleer M, Peeters E, Dams T, Peeters T. Electronic visual analogue scales for pain, fatigue, anxiety and quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis using smartphone and tablet: a reliability and feasibility study. Clin Rehabil. 2017 Sep;31(9):1215-1225. doi: 10.1177/0269215517692641. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
PMID: 28786335BACKGROUNDSenders A, Hanes D, Bourdette D, Carson K, Marshall LM, Shinto L. Impact of mindfulness-based stress reduction for people with multiple sclerosis at 8 weeks and 12 months: A randomized clinical trial. Mult Scler. 2019 Jul;25(8):1178-1188. doi: 10.1177/1352458518786650. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
PMID: 29985095BACKGROUNDHughes CM, Smyth S, Lowe-Strong AS. Reflexology for the treatment of pain in people with multiple sclerosis: a double-blind randomised sham-controlled clinical trial. Mult Scler. 2009 Nov;15(11):1329-38. doi: 10.1177/1352458509345916. Epub 2009 Oct 13.
PMID: 19825891BACKGROUNDSenders A, Borgatti A, Hanes D, Shinto L. Association Between Pain and Mindfulness in Multiple Sclerosis: A Cross-sectional Survey. Int J MS Care. 2018 Jan-Feb;20(1):28-34. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2016-076.
PMID: 29507540BACKGROUNDHadoush H, Alawneh A, Kassab M, Al-Wardat M, Al-Jarrah M. Effectiveness of non-pharmacological rehabilitation interventions in pain management in patients with multiple sclerosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. NeuroRehabilitation. 2022;50(4):347-365. doi: 10.3233/NRE-210328.
PMID: 35180138BACKGROUNDShkodina AD, Bardhan M, Chopra H, Anyagwa OE, Pinchuk VA, Hryn KV, Kryvchun AM, Boiko DI, Suresh V, Verma A, Delva MY. Pharmacological and Non-pharmacological Approaches for the Management of Neuropathic Pain in Multiple Sclerosis. CNS Drugs. 2024 Mar;38(3):205-224. doi: 10.1007/s40263-024-01072-5. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
PMID: 38421578BACKGROUNDAmtmann D, Askew RL, Kim J, Chung H, Ehde DM, Bombardier CH, Kraft GH, Jones SM, Johnson KL. Pain affects depression through anxiety, fatigue, and sleep in multiple sclerosis. Rehabil Psychol. 2015 Feb;60(1):81-90. doi: 10.1037/rep0000027. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
PMID: 25602361BACKGROUNDChitnis T, Vandercappellen J, King M, Brichetto G. Symptom Interconnectivity in Multiple Sclerosis: A Narrative Review of Potential Underlying Biological Disease Processes. Neurol Ther. 2022 Sep;11(3):1043-1070. doi: 10.1007/s40120-022-00368-2. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
PMID: 35680693BACKGROUNDGustavsen S, Olsson A, Sondergaard HB, Andresen SR, Sorensen PS, Sellebjerg F, Oturai A. The association of selected multiple sclerosis symptoms with disability and quality of life: a large Danish self-report survey. BMC Neurol. 2021 Aug 16;21(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s12883-021-02344-z.
PMID: 34399707BACKGROUNDFoley PL, Vesterinen HM, Laird BJ, Sena ES, Colvin LA, Chandran S, MacLeod MR, Fallon MT. Prevalence and natural history of pain in adults with multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain. 2013 May;154(5):632-642. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.12.002. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
PMID: 23318126BACKGROUNDPerez-Carmona N, Fernandez-Jover E, Sempere AP. [Epidemiology of multiple sclerosis in Spain]. Rev Neurol. 2019 Jul 1;69(1):32-38. doi: 10.33588/rn.6901.2018477. Spanish.
PMID: 31236909BACKGROUNDWang Y, Wang J, Feng J. Multiple sclerosis and pregnancy: Pathogenesis, influencing factors, and treatment options. Autoimmun Rev. 2023 Nov;22(11):103449. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2023.103449. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
PMID: 37741528BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Physiotherapist and MSc
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 26, 2026
First Posted
August 3, 2026
Study Start
September 2, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
April 30, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
April 30, 2027
Last Updated
August 3, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share