Analgesic Efficacy of Combined PECS II and PIP Block Versus Thoracic Paravertebral Block Post-Mastectomy
PECS-TPVB
Analgesic Efficacy Comparison of Combined PECS II and Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane (PIP) Block Versus Thoracic Paravertebral Block Post-Mastectomy: An Assessment of Pain Severity, Analgesia Duration, and Recovery Quality
1 other identifier
interventional
72
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Postoperative pain management is crucial for patients undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer. Regional analgesia techniques, such as the Thoracic Paravertebral Block (TPVB), are commonly used to reduce pain and opioid consumption; however, TPVB carries potential risks, including pneumothorax. Interfascial plane blocks, specifically the Pectoral Nerve II (PECS II) block combined with the Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane (PIP) block, have emerged as alternative techniques to provide comprehensive analgesia to both the lateral and anterior chest wall. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate and compare the analgesic efficacy and quality of postoperative recovery between a combination of ultrasound-guided PECS II and PIP blocks versus the standard Thoracic Paravertebral Block (TPVB) in patients undergoing mastectomy with or without axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either the combined PECS II and PIP block or the TPVB following general anesthesia induction. Pain scores, total opioid consumption, time to first analgesic request, quality of recovery using the QoR-15 questionnaire, and potential block-related complications will be monitored and compared over the 24-hour postoperative period.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 29, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 28, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 31, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2026
July 31, 2026
July 1, 2026
5 months
July 28, 2026
July 28, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Postoperative Quality of Recovery Score (QoR-15)
Patient-reported quality of recovery assessed using the 15-item Quality of Recovery questionnaire (QoR-15). The total score ranges from 0 to 150, where higher scores indicate better overall recovery quality post-surgery.
24 hours postoperatively
Postoperative Pain Severity (NRS)
Pain severity evaluated using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Measurements are recorded separately at rest and during active movement (shoulder joint movement / arm elevation).
Postoperative hours 0, 6, 12, and 24
Duration of Analgesia
Time elapsed from the completion of surgery (extubation/arrival at recovery room) to the patient's first request or activation of the Patient-Controlled Analgesia (PCA) morphine device. Measured in minutes/hours.
Up to 24 hours postoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Regional Block Procedure Execution Time
Intraoperative (during regional block administration)
Block-Related Complications
Intraoperative through 24 hours postoperatively
Study Arms (2)
Combined PECS II and PIP Block Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive an ultrasound-guided combination of PECS II block and superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane (PIP) block following general anesthesia induction. The PECS II block includes 15 mL of 0.25% Bupivacaine injected into the pecto-serratus plane and 10 mL of 0.25% Bupivacaine into the interpectoral plane at the T3-T4 level. The superficial PIP block includes 10 mL of 0.25% Bupivacaine injected between the pectoralis major and external intercostal muscles at the T4-T5 level. Total local anesthetic volume is 35 mL.
Thoracic Paravertebral Block Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants receive an ultrasound-guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block (TPVB) in the lateral decubitus position following general anesthesia induction. Injection of 5 mL 0.25% Bupivacaine per level is administered into the paravertebral space at thoracic levels T4 and T6. Total local anesthetic volume is 10 mL.
Interventions
Ultrasound-guided regional nerve block administration consisting of PECS II block (25 mL 0.25% Bupivacaine) and superficial PIP block (10 mL 0.25% Bupivacaine) post-induction of general anesthesia prior to surgical incision.
Ultrasound-guided regional nerve block administration consisting of TPVB with 0.25% Bupivacaine (5 mL at T4 level and 5 mL at T6 level) post-induction of general anesthesia prior to surgical incision.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female patients aged 18 to 60 years.
- Scheduled for breast cancer surgery (mastectomy with or without axillary lymph node dissection \[ALND\]).
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I to III.
- Provided signed written informed consent to participate in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient refusal to participate in the study.
- Known allergy to local anesthetics or study medications (e.g., bupivacaine, ketorolac, morphine).
- Coagulation disorders or coagulopathy.
- Mastectomy procedure with immediate breast reconstruction.
- Pre-existing chronic cancer pain with active usage of strong opioids (e.g., morphine, fentanyl).
- Cognitive impairment or inability to comprehend the pain assessment scale (NRS).
- Pregnancy.
- Active infection at the planned regional block injection site.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Dharmais National Cancer Center Hospital
Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, 11420, Indonesia
Related Publications (7)
Martinez-Vazquez P, Jensen EW. Different perspectives for monitoring nociception during general anesthesia. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2022 Apr;75(2):112-123. doi: 10.4097/kja.22002. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
PMID: 35172074BACKGROUNDLedowski T. Objective monitoring of nociception: a review of current commercial solutions. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Aug;123(2):e312-e321. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.03.024. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
PMID: 31047645BACKGROUNDBarrington MJ, Seah GJ, Gotmaker R, Lim D, Byrne K. Quality of Recovery After Breast Surgery: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Pectoral Nerves Interfascial Plane (Pectoral Nerves II) Block With Surgical Infiltration. Anesth Analg. 2020 Jun;130(6):1559-1567. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004371.
PMID: 31490251BACKGROUNDKleif J, Gogenur I. Severity classification of the quality of recovery-15 score-An observational study. J Surg Res. 2018 May;225:101-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.12.040. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
PMID: 29605019BACKGROUNDKleif J, Waage J, Christensen KB, Gogenur I. Systematic review of the QoR-15 score, a patient- reported outcome measure measuring quality of recovery after surgery and anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Jan;120(1):28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.013. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
PMID: 29397134BACKGROUNDWessels E, Perrie H, Scribante J, Jooma Z. Quality of recovery in the perioperative setting: A narrative review. J Clin Anesth. 2022 Jun;78:110685. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.110685. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
PMID: 35190342BACKGROUNDTeng WN, Lin YS, Sung CS, Tseng LM, Chang WK, Ting CK. Analgesia-nociception index accurately predicts inadequate pectoralis muscle fascia block (PECS) in patients undergoing breast surgery: A prospective observational study. J Formos Med Assoc. 2025 Jan;124(1):38-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2024.02.019. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
PMID: 38448346BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- This trial employs a single-blind masking design in which outcome assessors and clinical staff responsible for postoperative care-including recovery room nurses, ward physicians, and research assistants-are blinded to the treatment allocation. The regional block procedures (combined PECS II + PIP block or Thoracic Paravertebral Block) are performed intraoperatively by designated regional anesthesiologists who are not involved in postoperative outcome assessment or data collection, ensuring an unbiased evaluation of pain scores, quality of recovery, and analgesia duration.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Anesthesiologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 28, 2026
First Posted
July 31, 2026
Study Start
June 29, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
November 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Last Updated
July 31, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data will not be publicly shared to protect patient confidentiality and privacy. Aggregated study results and anonymized data may be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author, subject to institutional ethics committee approval and data sharing agreements.