NCT07732036

Brief Summary

The goal of this pilot clinical trial is to learn if inhalation aromatherapy works to reduce anxiety and pain in patients with venous leg ulcers undergoing conservative sharp wound debridement (CSWD). It will also learn about the feasibility of implementing this intervention in clinical practice. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does inhalation aromatherapy reduce anxiety levels during CSWD procedures, as measured by STAI-S scores? Does inhalation aromatherapy reduce pain intensity during CSWD procedures? Is inhalation aromatherapy feasible and acceptable to implement in a clinical setting? What are the protocol adherence rates and potential areas of missing data? Researchers will compare inhalation aromatherapy using Asian essential oil extracts to standard care to see if aromatherapy works to reduce anxiety and pain during wound debridement. Participants will: Receive either inhalation aromatherapy or standard care during their CSWD procedure Complete State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S) questionnaires before and after the procedure Rate their pain intensity using visual analog scales during the debridement Provide feedback on treatment satisfaction and acceptability Attend clinic visits for wound debridement as part of their standard care This pilot study hypothesizes that inhalation aromatherapy is feasible and acceptable to implement in a clinical setting and may be associated with differences in anxiety and pain intensity during CSWD, compared to standard care

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
20mo left

Started Jun 2026

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress9%
Jun 2026Mar 2028

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 5, 2026

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 17, 2026

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 28, 2026

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 30, 2027

Expected
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 30, 2028

Last Updated

July 28, 2026

Status Verified

July 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

June 17, 2026

Last Update Submit

July 22, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Venous leg ulcersSharp wound debridementAromatherapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Participation Rate

    The number of recruited patients divided by total eligible patients approached, expressed as a percentage.

    Throughout the 12-month data collection period from October 2026 to September 2027.

  • Retention rate

    The number of patients remaining divided by total patients who consented, expressed as a percentage.

    The number of participants completed 3rd clinic visit/15th day, across the 12-month data collection period from October 2026 to September 2027. Clinic visit 1 - 1st Day- week 1, Clinic visit 2 -8th Day- week 2, Clinic visit 3- 15th Day- week 3.

  • Percentage Change in State Anxiety Level During Conservative Sharp Wound Debridement

    Percentage change in STAI-S score at T1 (2nd clinic visit/2nd week/8th day): (pre-CSWD STAI-S minus post-CSWD STAI-S) divided by pre-CSWD STAI-S, multiplied by 100. Unit: percentage change on STAI-S scale. Percentage change in STAI-S score at T2 (3rd clinic visit/3rd week/15th Day), calculated. Unit: percentage change on STAI-S scale. Reported separately to assess sustainability of effect over time.

    Completed at 3rd clinic visit/15th day, across the 12-month data collection period from October 2026 to September 2027. Clinic visit 1 - 1st Day- week 1, Clinic visit 2 -8th Day- week 2, Clinic visit 3- 15th Day- week 3

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Protocol Adherence Rate

    Assessed throughout the 12-month data collection period from October 2026 to September 2027.

  • Attrition Rate and Extent of Missing Data

    Assessed through the 12-month data collection period from October 2026 to September 2027. Clinic visit 1 - 1st Day- week 1, Clinic visit 2 -8th Day- week 2, Clinic visit 3- 15th Day- week 3.

  • Change in Pain Intensity During Conservative Sharp Wound Debridement

    Change in pain intensity measured pre- and post-CSWD at T1 (2nd Clinic visit/8th Day) and T2 (3rd Clinic visit/15th Day) to assess sustainability, using (VAS), scored 0-100mm. Clinic visit 2 -8th Day- week 2, Clinic visit 3 -15th Day -week3.

Study Arms (2)

Inhalation Aromatherapy- Intervention group

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants allocated to the intervention group receive a personal nasal inhalation stick infused with a blend of Asian aromatic plant extracts formulated by a qualified aromatherapist, selected based on known anxiolytic and analgesic pharmacological properties. The final blend is determined through a scent preference evaluation conducted with five VLU patient volunteers prior to the main study. Participants inhale the stick for 5 minutes before entering the clinic room and continue using it throughout the CSWD procedure for up to 10 minutes or until the procedure is completed, inhaling at least twice in each nostril prior to the procedure. Aromatherapy works through positive olfactory effects and direct modulation of the amygdala via the olfactory nerve, potentially reducing anxiety and enhancing comfort during the procedure. Each participant is issued their own inhalation stick for personal use across all study visits to maintain hygiene and ensure consistent dosing.

Other: Inhalation Aromatherapy

Inhalation Placebo-Control group

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Participants allocated to the control group receive a personal nasal inhalation stick identical in appearance, size, and packaging to the intervention stick, containing certified organic jojoba carrier oil with no known anxiolytic properties. Jojoba oil has a barely perceptible, slightly sweet aroma and is widely used in aromatherapy blends. Participants follow an identical inhalation protocol to the intervention group, inhaling for 5 minutes before the procedure and continuing throughout CSWD for up to 10 minutes or until the procedure is completed. This ensures that any non-specific effects of the inhalation ritual, including focused breathing and expectation of benefit, are equally present in both arms, thereby isolating the specific pharmacological effect of the aromatic compounds.

Other: Inhalation Aromatherapy

Interventions

Patients are allocated to either the Inhalation Aromatherapy or Inhalation Placebo group in a 1:1 ratio via randomly permuted block randomization. The randomization sequence is generated by a non-study member using a computer-generated program. Allocation concealment is maintained through the use of sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes to prevent selection . Inhalation aromatherapy intervention an inhalation stick containing a blend of Asian aromatic plant extracts, including Basil, Elemi, and Calamansi, specifically selected for their pharmacological properties in alleviating anxiety, agitation, stress, and pain. Unlike conventional pharmacological interventions, the dose is not fixed but individually determined by the frequency of inhalation, varying based on individual pharmacokinetics and personal response to the aroma. Patients inhale at least twice, once in each nostril, beginning five minutes before the procedure and continuing throughout CSWD for up to ten minutes.

Inhalation Aromatherapy- Intervention groupInhalation Placebo-Control group

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years - 21 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • ≥21 years old
  • Venous leg ulcers requiring conservative sharp wound debridement

You may not qualify if:

  • Known sensitivity or hypersensitivity to essential oils or any components in the Aromatherapy scent formulation
  • Allergic rhinitis, asthma, chronic lung disease or any disease that impairs the sense of smell
  • Airway hypersensitivity to fragrances, paint/gasoline fumes or turpentine
  • Using aromatherapy of any kind
  • Taking any anti-psychotic drugs
  • Incapable of providing verbal/written consent
  • On anti-anxiety medications

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Singapore General Hospital

Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

RECRUITING

Singapore General Hospital

Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

RECRUITING

Related Publications (22)

  • Rohi Ganji M, Jafari F, Rezaeian S, Abdi H, Farzaei MH, Khatony A. The Effect of Inhalation Aromatherapy and Music Therapy on Anxiety in Patients Undergoing Shockwave Lithotripsy: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Jun 29;2022:8015798. doi: 10.1155/2022/8015798. eCollection 2022.

    PMID: 35815287BACKGROUND
  • RETRACTION: The Role of Orthobiologics in Chronic Wound Healing. Int Wound J. 2025 Aug;22(8):e70744. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70744.

    PMID: 40769517BACKGROUND
  • Liu YF, Ni PW, Huang Y, Xie T. Therapeutic strategies for chronic wound infection. Chin J Traumatol. 2022 Jan;25(1):11-16. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2021.07.004. Epub 2021 Jul 6.

    PMID: 34315658BACKGROUND
  • James KA, Stromin JI, Steenkamp N, Combrinck MI. Understanding the relationships between physiological and psychosocial stress, cortisol and cognition. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Mar 6;14:1085950. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1085950. eCollection 2023.

    PMID: 36950689BACKGROUND
  • Thomas DC, Tsu CL, Nain RA, Arsat N, Fun SS, Sahid Nik Lah NA. The role of debridement in wound bed preparation in chronic wound: A narrative review. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Oct 4;71:102876. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102876. eCollection 2021 Nov.

    PMID: 34745599BACKGROUND
  • Cui J, Li M, Wei Y, Li H, He X, Yang Q, Li Z, Duan J, Wu Z, Chen Q, Chen B, Li G, Ming X, Xiong L, Qin D. Inhalation Aromatherapy via Brain-Targeted Nasal Delivery: Natural Volatiles or Essential Oils on Mood Disorders. Front Pharmacol. 2022 Apr 12;13:860043. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.860043. eCollection 2022.

    PMID: 35496310BACKGROUND
  • Fiala CA, Abbott LI, Carter CD, Hillis SL, Wolf JS, Schuster M, Dulski R, Grice EA, Rakel BA, Gardner SE. Severe pain during wound care procedures: A cross-sectional study protocol. J Adv Nurs. 2018 May 7:10.1111/jan.13699. doi: 10.1111/jan.13699. Online ahead of print.

    PMID: 29733454BACKGROUND
  • Matsuzaki K, Upton D. Wound treatment and pain management: a stressful time. Int Wound J. 2013 Dec;10(6):638-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01038.x. Epub 2012 Aug 21.

    PMID: 22905710BACKGROUND
  • Hedigan F, Sheridan H, Sasse A. Benefit of inhalation aromatherapy as a complementary treatment for stress and anxiety in a clinical setting - A systematic review. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2023 Aug;52:101750. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2023.101750. Epub 2023 Apr 5.

    PMID: 37031643BACKGROUND
  • Zhang N, Yao L. Anxiolytic Effect of Essential Oils and Their Constituents: A Review. J Agric Food Chem. 2019 Dec 18;67(50):13790-13808. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b00433. Epub 2019 Jun 13.

    PMID: 31148444BACKGROUND
  • Woo KY. Chronic wound-associated pain, psychological stress, and wound healing. Surg Technol Int. 2012 Dec;22:57-65.

    PMID: 23023574BACKGROUND
  • Brown A. The assessment and treatment of wound pain. Nurs Times. 2015 Nov 18-24;111(47):15-7.

    PMID: 26721090BACKGROUND
  • Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Marucha PT, Malarkey WB, Mercado AM, Glaser R. Slowing of wound healing by psychological stress. Lancet. 1995 Nov 4;346(8984):1194-6. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92899-5.

    PMID: 7475659BACKGROUND
  • McGuire L, Heffner K, Glaser R, Needleman B, Malarkey W, Dickinson S, Lemeshow S, Cook C, Muscarella P, Melvin WS, Ellison EC, Kiecolt-Glaser JK. Pain and wound healing in surgical patients. Ann Behav Med. 2006 Apr;31(2):165-72. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm3102_8.

    PMID: 16542131BACKGROUND
  • Briggs M, Nelson EA, Martyn-St James M. Topical agents or dressings for pain in venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11(11):CD001177. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001177.pub3.

    PMID: 23152206BACKGROUND
  • Gardner SE, Abbott LI, Fiala CA, Rakel BA. Factors associated with high pain intensity during wound care procedures: A model. Wound Repair Regen. 2017 Aug;25(4):558-563. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12553. Epub 2017 Aug 14.

    PMID: 28805960BACKGROUND
  • Rodd-Nielsen E, Harris CL. Conservative sharp wound debridement: an overview of Canadian education, practice, risk, and policy. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2013 Nov-Dec;40(6):594-601. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e3182a9ae8c.

    PMID: 24202223BACKGROUND
  • Sun X, Jiang K, Chen J, Wu L, Lu H, Wang A, Wang J. A systematic review of maggot debridement therapy for chronically infected wounds and ulcers. Int J Infect Dis. 2014 Aug;25:32-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2014.03.1397. Epub 2014 May 16.

    PMID: 24841930BACKGROUND
  • Tian X, Liang XM, Song GM, Zhao Y, Yang XL. Maggot debridement therapy for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a meta-analysis. J Wound Care. 2013 Sep;22(9):462-9. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2013.22.9.462.

    PMID: 24005780BACKGROUND
  • Malone M, Bjarnsholt T, McBain AJ, James GA, Stoodley P, Leaper D, Tachi M, Schultz G, Swanson T, Wolcott RD. The prevalence of biofilms in chronic wounds: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published data. J Wound Care. 2017 Jan 2;26(1):20-25. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.1.20.

    PMID: 28103163BACKGROUND
  • Schultz GS, Sibbald RG, Falanga V, Ayello EA, Dowsett C, Harding K, Romanelli M, Stacey MC, Teot L, Vanscheidt W. Wound bed preparation: a systematic approach to wound management. Wound Repair Regen. 2003 Mar;11 Suppl 1:S1-28. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-475x.11.s2.1.x.

    PMID: 12654015BACKGROUND
  • Anghel EL, DeFazio MV, Barker JC, Janis JE, Attinger CE. Current Concepts in Debridement: Science and Strategies. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Sep;138(3 Suppl):82S-93S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002651.

    PMID: 27556779BACKGROUND

Central Study Contacts

Nanthakumahrie Gunasegaran

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
Participants will be allocated to either the Inhalation Aromatherapy intervention group or the Inhalation Placebo control group in a 1:1 ratio using randomly permuted block randomization, ensuring balanced allocation throughout the recruitment period. The randomization sequence will be generated by an independent member not involved in recruitment, intervention delivery, or outcome assessment, keeping the allocation process free from investigator influence. Upon confirmation of eligibility and informed consent, each participant will be assigned according to the pre-generated sequence. Allocation concealment will be maintained until the point of assignment, with block sizes kept undisclosed to further safeguard concealment. This rigorous process strengthens internal validity and supports a fair and unbiased comparison across the planned 40-participant sample. Unblinding will only occur after all data have been collected and locked.
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This study employs a control trial design to evaluate the efficacy of inhalation aromatherapy in reducing procedural anxiety and pain during chronic wound debridement. Participants are randomized into either an intervention group receiving an inhalation stick containing a blend of Asian aromatic plant extracts, or a control group receiving an identical inhalation stick containing only jojoba carrier oil with no known anxiolytic properties. Both groups follow a standardized pain management plan, whereby patients consume their existing oral analgesic prior to the clinic visit. The intervention is administered for five minutes before the procedure and continued for up to ten minutes during the procedure. Feasibility and acceptability are assessed alongside primary outcomes, with acceptability measured via a five-point Likert scale satisfaction survey administered at the final visit.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 17, 2026

First Posted

July 28, 2026

Study Start

June 5, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 30, 2028

Last Updated

July 28, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-07

Locations