Comparative Efficacy of Earplug Usage Instruction
CEEUIn
1 other identifier
interventional
64
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether video-based training or paper-based training is more effective at teaching correct earplug insertion technique, in hospital personnel at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital who work in noise-exposed areas (e.g. laundry and kitchen units), aged 20-60 years. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Undergo a baseline history and ear exam (otoscopy) and complete a demographic questionnaire .
- Have their baseline earplug insertion skill assessed by a blinded observer Be randomly assigned to receive either a 5-minute video-based or paper-based instruction on proper earplug use .
- Practice inserting earplugs and then be reassessed immediately after training
- Return after 1 week for a follow-up assessment to test retention of the skill
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 8, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 11, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 28, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2026
ExpectedJuly 28, 2026
July 1, 2026
22 days
July 11, 2026
July 24, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The primary outcome is earplug insertion skill, defined as the participant's ability to correctly perform earplug insertion ,using the Standardized Foam Earplug Insertion Checklist (SFEIC) .
The primary outcome is earplug insertion skill, defined as the participant's ability to correctly perform earplug insertion. Skill will be assessed using the Standardized Foam Earplug Insertion Checklist (SFEIC) , a standardized 20-point observational checklist (10 points per ear), covering key steps such as hand hygiene, earplug preparation, insertion technique, and fit verification. Each item is scored as correct (1 point) or incorrect (0 points), for a total score ranging from 0 (minimum) to 20 (maximum). Higher scores indicate better (more correct) earplug insertion technique. Participants will be asked to demonstrate earplug insertion, and performance will be evaluated by trained assessors blinded to group allocation.
before the instruction , Immediately after the instruction and at 1 weeks post-intervention
Study Arms (2)
Arm 1 : Video-Based Earplug Instruction
EXPERIMENTALArm 1 * Arm Label: Video-based instruction * Arm Type: Experimental * Arm Description: Participants receive a 3-minute narrated video demonstrating proper earplug insertion technique, followed by practice and assessment.
Arm 2 : Paper-Based Earplug Instruction
ACTIVE COMPARATORArm 2 * Arm Label: Paper-based instruction * Arm Type: Active Comparator * Arm Description: Participants receive a paper-based illustrated infographic with written instructions covering identical content to the video, followed by practice and assessment.
Interventions
A 3-minute narrated video demonstrating proper earplug insertion technique, covering hand hygiene, checking earplugs, proper rolling technique, ear canal opening, insertion method, adjustment, and verification of fit. Content is standardized and validated by content experts.
An illustrated step-by-step infographic with brief written instructions covering identical content to the video-based module (hand hygiene, earplug preparation, insertion technique, and fit verification), reviewed and validated by content experts.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Personnel aged 20-60 years old who report regular works in areas perceived as noisy department
- Personnel who works at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, during the year 2026.
- Personel who is willing and able to participate in the study throughout its duration.
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals with active ear infections.
- Individuals with ear canal stenosis that limit to insert the earplug.
- Individuals with visual or auditory impairment that limit to read or see the instruction
- Individuals who have limitation to use their hands to insert the ear plug.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sirinthorn Chanaverojlead
- Chiang Mai Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Department of Otolaryngology Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University
Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand
Related Publications (15)
Yusoff MSB. ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Education in Medicine Journal. 2019;11(2):49-54. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2019.11.2.6
BACKGROUNDTsukada T, Sakakibara H. A trail of individual education for hearing protection with an instrument that measures the noise attenuation effect of wearing earplugs. Ind Health. 2008 Aug;46(4):393-6. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.46.393.
PMID: 18716388BACKGROUNDTakada MM, Rocha CH, Neves-Lobo IF, Moreira RR, Samelli AG. Training in the proper use of earplugs: An objective evaluation. Work. 2020;65(2):401-407. doi: 10.3233/WOR-203092.
PMID: 32007983BACKGROUNDSliwinska-Kowalska M, Davis A. Noise-induced hearing loss. Noise Health. 2012 Nov-Dec;14(61):274-80. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.104893.
PMID: 23257577BACKGROUNDShukla A, Harper M, Pedersen E, Goman A, Suen JJ, Price C, Applebaum J, Hoyer M, Lin FR, Reed NS. Hearing Loss, Loneliness, and Social Isolation: A Systematic Review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 May;162(5):622-633. doi: 10.1177/0194599820910377. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
PMID: 32151193BACKGROUNDSalmani Nodoushan M, Mehrparvar AH, Torab Jahromi M, Safaei S, Mollasadeghi A. Training in using earplugs or using earplugs with a higher than necessary noise reduction rating? A randomized clinical trial. Int J Occup Environ Med. 2014 Oct;5(4):187-93.
PMID: 25270008BACKGROUNDMurphy WJ, Stephenson MR, Byrne DC, Witt B, Duran J. Effects of training on hearing protector attenuation. Noise Health. 2011 Mar-Apr;13(51):132-41. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.77215.
PMID: 21368438BACKGROUNDLiberman MC. Noise-induced and age-related hearing loss: new perspectives and potential therapies. F1000Res. 2017 Jun 16;6:927. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.11310.1. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 28690836BACKGROUNDGong W, Murphy WJ, Meinke DK, Feng HA, Stephenson MR. Evaluating Earplug Performance over a 2-Hour Work Period with a Fit-Test System. Semin Hear. 2023 Jun 1;44(4):470-484. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1769586. eCollection 2023 Nov.
PMID: 37818150BACKGROUNDDaniel E. Noise and hearing loss: a review. J Sch Health. 2007 May;77(5):225-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2007.00197.x.
PMID: 17430434BACKGROUNDChow, S.-C., Shao, J., & Wang, H. (2003). Sample Size Calculations in Clinical Research (2nd ed.). Chapman & Hall/CRC., p. 51.
BACKGROUNDCenters for Disease Control and Prevention [Internet]. Washington, DC: DHHS, CDC. [updated 2024; cited 2025]. Noise and hearing loss prevention; [about 1 screen]. Available from www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/noise/about.html (Accessed 29 January 2025).
BACKGROUNDBrueck, E. (n.d.).Hearing protection. OSHwiki. Retrieved January 29, 2025, from https://oshwiki.osha.europa.eu/en/themes/hearing-protection
BACKGROUND2. Berger, E. H. (2000). Hearing protection devices. In E. H. Berger, L. H. Royster, J. D. Royster, D. P. Driscoll, & M. Layne (Eds.), The Noise Manual (5th ed.). Fairfax, VA: AIHA Press.
BACKGROUNDBasner M, Babisch W, Davis A, Brink M, Clark C, Janssen S, Stansfeld S. Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health. Lancet. 2014 Apr 12;383(9925):1325-1332. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61613-X. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
PMID: 24183105BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
sirinthorn chanaveroj
Department of Otolaryngology , Faculty of medicine Chiang Mai university
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Outcome assessors administering the skill assessment checklist and the data analysts are blinded to group allocation. Due to the nature of the intervention, participants themselves cannot be blinded to which training format (video vs. paper) they receive.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Resident, Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 11, 2026
First Posted
July 28, 2026
Study Start
June 8, 2026
Primary Completion
June 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 31, 2026
Last Updated
July 28, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data will not be shared to protect patient privacy and confidentiality in accordance with the institutional review board approval.