This Exploratory Medical Device Study Evaluated the Arrhythmia Diagnostic Yield of MEMO Patch V2, a Wearable Patch-type Electrocardiographic Monitor, in Adults With Suspected Arrhythmia Who Presented With Symptoms Such as Palpitations or Dizziness, or Who Had Cryptogenic Ischemic Stroke or Transient
A Multicenter, Non-randomized, Controlled, Open-label Pilot Clinical Trial to Compare and Evaluate the Arrhythmia Diagnostic Performance of MEMO Patch V2 and 24-Hour Ambulatory Electrocardiography in Patients With Suspected Arrhythmia Presenting With Palpitations or Dizziness
1 other identifier
interventional
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This exploratory medical device study evaluated the arrhythmia diagnostic yield of MEMO Patch V2, a wearable patch-type electrocardiographic monitor, in adults with suspected arrhythmia who presented with symptoms such as palpitations or dizziness, or who had cryptogenic ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. The diagnostic yield of MEMO Patch V2 was compared with that of conventional 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiography (Holter monitoring). The study also assessed ECG signal quality, participant compliance, usability and satisfaction, and skin-related adverse events. The findings were intended to provide preliminary data for planning a future large-scale clinical study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 5, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 5, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 20, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 23, 2026
CompletedJuly 23, 2026
July 1, 2026
10 months
July 20, 2026
July 20, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Arrhythmia Detection Rate (%)
The proportion of participants diagnosed with at least one arrhythmia using MEMO Patch V2 was compared with the proportion diagnosed using the 24-hour Holter monitor. Arrhythmias included premature atrial contraction, premature ventricular contraction, atrial tachycardia, atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation, paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, ventricular tachycardia, second- or third-degree atrioventricular block, sinus pause, and other arrhythmias. Comparisons included the total monitoring periods (Holter: 24 hours; MEMO Patch V2: at least 7 days) and the first 24 hours for both devices.
From device application on Day 0 through completion of MEMO Patch V2 monitoring, up to 14 days
Secondary Outcomes (3)
ECG Signal Quality
Up to 14 days
Participant Compliance
Up to 14 days
Usability and Satisfaction
Day 21 ± 3 days
Other Outcomes (1)
Skin-Related Adverse Events
From Day 0 through Day 21 ± 3 days
Study Arms (1)
MEMO Patch V2 and 24-Hour Holter Monitoring
EXPERIMENTALParticipants underwent simultaneous ECG monitoring with MEMO Patch V2 for up to 14 days and a conventional Holter monitor for 24 hours.
Interventions
MEMO Patch V2 is a wearable, single-channel patch-type ECG monitoring device intended for long-term ambulatory ECG recording. The device was applied on Day 0 and used for continuous ECG monitoring for up to 14 days. ECG data were stored and transferred for review through the MEMO ECG Webviewer. Electrode patches were replaced every 24 hours, and the device was returned by courier after monitoring.
A conventional ambulatory electrocardiographic monitor was applied simultaneously with MEMO Patch V2 on Day 0 and used for continuous ECG recording for approximately 24 hours. The device was removed and returned at the clinical site on Day 1.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults aged 19 to 80 years.
- Participants who required ECG monitoring because of suspected arrhythmia associated with symptoms such as palpitations or dizziness; or participants with cryptogenic ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack.
- Participants able to wear MEMO Patch V2 for 14 days.
- Participants who received a detailed explanation of the study, fully understood it, and voluntarily provided written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- History of allergic reactions to adhesive products.
- Participants who required inpatient management during the study because of atrial fibrillation, stroke, transient ischemic attack, another clinically significant condition as determined by the investigator, or a history of dehydration or syncope within 1 year before screening.
- Any other condition that, in the investigator's judgment, made the participant unsuitable for study participation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- HUINNO Co., Ltdlead
Study Sites (1)
Korea University Anam Hospital
Seoul, 02841, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jong-Il Choi
MD, Division of Cardiology, Korea University Anam Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Il-Young Oh
MD, Division of Cardiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 20, 2026
First Posted
July 23, 2026
Study Start
September 1, 2021
Primary Completion
July 5, 2022
Study Completion
July 5, 2022
Last Updated
July 23, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data collected in this study are not planned to be shared with external researchers. Any future sharing would require separate sponsor approval and compliance with applicable privacy, ethical, and institutional requirements.