Bipolar Enucleation of the Prostate Versus Bipolar TURP
TURP
A Comparative Study Of Clinical Outcomes Of Bipolar Enucleation Of The Prostate Versus Bipolar TURP In Management Of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia : A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Bipolar enucleation of the prostate (BEEP) was introduced to treat patients with large prostate. The study compared the functional outcomes and perioperative complications of bipolar TURP and bipolar enucleation of large prostates above 80 gm.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 14, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 17, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 21, 2026
CompletedJuly 31, 2026
July 1, 2026
12 months
July 17, 2026
July 30, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
volume of residual prostatic adenoma
measurement of volume of residual prostatic adenoma post bipolar TURP and BEEP was done by pelvi-abdominal ultrasound
one month postoperative
change in international prostate symptoms score
The international prostate symptoms score is a patient-completed questionnaire for standardized assessment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). It includes seven questions that evaluate the following urinary symptoms: * Weak urinary stream (0 : 5) * Incomplete bladder emptying (0 : 5) * Straining during urination (0 : 5) * Intermittent urine flow (0 : 5) * Increased urinary frequency (0 : 5) * Urgency (0 : 5) * Nocturia (0 : 5) Grade 1 (score = 0 - 7) : Mild LUTS Grade 2 (score = 8 - 19) : Moderate LUTS Grade 3 (score = 20 - 35) : Severe LUTS
pre-operative, one, three, six and twelve months postoperative
change in maximum urine flow rate(Q max)
Maximum urine flow rate was evaluated by Uroflowmetry
pre-operative, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperative
Secondary Outcomes (2)
change in post voiding residual urine
pre-operative, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperative
operation time
during operation
Study Arms (2)
bipolar TURP
ACTIVE COMPARATORtransurethral resection of the prostate by bipolar current
BEEP
ACTIVE COMPARATORendoscopic enucleation of the prostate by bipolar current
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All male patients above the age of 40 years who presented to the urology clinic in Ain Shams university hospitals with BPH with prostate size 80 - 120 g and have any of the following criteria:
- Voiding symptoms that are poorly responsive to medical treatment (IPSS more than 18 and Qmax less than 15 ml/sec)
- Persistent or recurrent attacks of urine retention due to BPH.
- Large bladder stones from BPH.
- Recurrent UTI due to BPH.
- Severe gross hematuria from BPH.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with untreated or active UTI.
- Previous pelvic radiation or pelvicl trauma.
- Patients with anesthesia contraindications such as uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, severe coagulation disorders and severe cardiac diseases.
- Known or suspected neurogenic bladder.
- Urethral stricture or urethral cancer.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ain Shams university hospitals
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, 11566, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- A statistician randomized the eligible patients using block randomization with a block size of 8. Allocation concealment was achieved using sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes. The participants were blinded to the assigned type of intervention at the time of surgery. Outcome assessors also were blinded, whereas surgeons were not blinded.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 17, 2026
First Posted
July 21, 2026
Study Start
July 1, 2025
Primary Completion
June 30, 2026
Study Completion
July 14, 2026
Last Updated
July 31, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share