Exploring the Feasibility and Effectiveness of a MIED-Based Adolescent Mindfulness Intervention Group for Youth With Emotional Distress
1 other identifier
interventional
40
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Background: Adolescent emotional distress (anxiety and depressive symptoms) is rising globally. The detection rate of depression risk among Chinese middle and high school students reaches 24.6%, with anxiety risk at 18.1%. These conditions show high comorbidity, high recurrence, and high disability rates, seriously affecting adolescents' academic performance, social relationships, and quality of life. Mindfulness-Based Interventions (MBIs) have shown significant effects in children and adolescent populations; meta-analyses indicate a moderate effect size on adolescent internalizing problems (Hedges' g = 0.47). Group-based adolescent mindfulness interventions are feasible, as the group format improves efficiency, reduces costs, and provides social support. However, existing research still has limitations in cultural adaptation and systematic intervention design. The MIED (Mindfulness Intervention for Emotional Distress) systematic theory was developed by researcher Liu Xinghua based on MBSR/UP. Its core theory is the "Diamond Model" of emotional distress, identifying four core maintenance mechanisms: engagement in life, distress tolerance regulation, emotional behavior regulation, and cognitive flexibility enhancement. Adult studies on MIED have shown significant improvements in emotional distress symptoms, but no specialized research has been conducted in adolescent populations. Methods: This study is a feasibility exploratory study employing a single-group pre-post design, planning to recruit 24-30 adolescents aged 12-18 years with emotional distress, to undergo an 8-week MIED adolescent mindfulness intervention group. Data will be collected at multiple time points: baseline, after session 4, after session 8, and at 1-month follow-up. Objectives: The primary objective is to evaluate the feasibility of the MIED-based adolescent mindfulness intervention group (recruitment feasibility, retention feasibility, implementation feasibility, acceptability, and safety). The secondary objective is to preliminarily assess the intervention's effectiveness on outcomes such as anxiety, depression, and stress, estimate effect sizes, and provide methodological preparation for subsequent large-scale randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2026
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 20, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 21, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2027
July 21, 2026
July 1, 2026
8 months
July 1, 2026
July 20, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale(GAD-7)
Anxiety symptoms: Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7). Scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worse outcome (more severe anxiety symptoms)
Screening phase(Pre-enrollment screening,T0), Baseline assessment(1 day before session 1,T1), Week4(After session 4,T2) ,Week8(After session 8,T3), and 1 month(post-intervention follow-up,T4)
Patient Health Questionnaire-9(PHQ-9)
Depressive symptoms:Patient Health Questionnaire-9, 9 items, self-report;Scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating worse outcome.
Screening phase(Pre-enrollment screening,T0), Baseline assessment(1 day before session 1,T1), Week4(After session 4,T2) ,Week8(After session 8,T3), and 1 month(post-intervention follow-up,T4)
Perceived Stress Scale(PSS-10)
Perceived stress:Perceived Stress Scale, 10 items, self-report;Scores range from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating worse outcome.
Screening phase(Pre-enrollment screening,T0), Baseline assessment(1 day before session 1,T1), Week4(After session 4,T2) ,Week8(After session 8,T3), and 1 month(post-intervention follow-up,T4)
Secondary Outcomes (5)
10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale(CD-RISC-10)
Baseline assessment(1 day before session 1,T1), Week4(After session 4,T2) ,Week8(After session 8,T3), and 1 month(post-intervention follow-up,T4)
Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-Short Form(DERS-16)
Baseline assessment(1 day before session 1,T1), Week4(After session 4,T2) ,Week8(After session 8,T3), and 1 month(post-intervention follow-up,T4)
Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS)
Baseline (T1), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 (T2), 5, 6, 7 (during intervention), Week 8 immediately post-intervention (T3), and 1 month(post-intervention follow-up,T4)
Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS)
Baseline (T1), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 (T2), 5, 6, 7 (during intervention), Week 8 immediately post-intervention (T3), and 1 month(post-intervention follow-up,T4)
Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire-Short Form(FFMQ-SF)
Baseline assessment(1 day before session 1,T1), Week4(After session 4,T2) ,Week8(After session 8,T3), and 1 month(post-intervention follow-up,T4)
Other Outcomes (5)
Process indicator - attendance rate
Week 8 (immediately after session 8,T3)
Process indicator -homework completion rate
Week 8 (immediately after session 8,T3)
Process indicator - dropout rate and reasons
Week 8 (immediately after session 8,T3)
- +2 more other outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Adolescent Group
EXPERIMENTALAdolescent Group Curriculum: An 8-week adolescent group curriculum adapted from the MIED adult 8-week program, incorporating the cognitive developmental characteristics, social needs, and preferences of adolescents. Curriculum content is based on the MIED Diamond Model modules: awareness and mindfulness, emotion recognition, engagement in life, distress tolerance regulation, emotional behavior regulation, cognitive flexibility enhancement, integration and daily practice, etc. Parent Group Curriculum: The parent group setup references the approach of Pan et al. (2025) in including a parent group in the Chinese version of UP-A. Core objectives of the parent group include: enhancing parents' understanding of adolescent emotional distress; teaching parents strategies to support adolescent mindfulness practice and emotion regulation; improving parent-child communication; and improving parents' own MIED Diamond Model practice and stress management.
Interventions
Adolescent Group: Basic curriculum structure: 8 sessions, once per week, 90-120 minutes per session, 12-15 participants per group. Parent Group Curriculum: Number of sessions: 4 (or 8, synchronized with the adolescent group), once every 2 weeks (or once per week), 120 minutes per session.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- PHQ-9 total score 10-19 or GAD-7 total score 10-14 (either criterion is sufficient, indicating mild to moderate depressive or anxiety symptoms).
- Informed consent from both the participant and their parent/legal guardian.
You may not qualify if:
- PHQ-9 total score ≥20 or GAD-7 total score ≥15, or clinical diagnosis of anxiety or depressive disorder (if severe depression or anxiety, referral to individual therapy is recommended).
- PHQ-9 item 9 score ≥2 and clinical interview confirming active suicidal ideation or plan.
- Presence of psychotic symptoms, bipolar disorder, or severe self-harm behaviors (requiring medical treatment).
- Currently receiving other systematic psychotherapy.
- Severe cognitive or developmental disorders that prevent understanding of group content.
- Unable to use a smartphone (affecting use of AI-assisted tools).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Xinghua Liulead
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Xinghua Liu, PhD
Peking University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Reasearcher
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 1, 2026
First Posted
July 21, 2026
Study Start
July 20, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
March 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 31, 2027
Last Updated
July 21, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Deidentified individual participant data (IPD) underlying the results reported in the main publication will be available upon reasonable request after publication of the primary trial results. The shared data will include deidentified participant-level data used in the primary and secondary analyses, including baseline characteristics, group allocation, outcome measures, follow-up assessments, adherence indicators, and safety outcomes. Directly or indirectly identifiable information will not be shared. Access will be provided to qualified researchers with a methodologically sound proposal, subject to approval by the principal investigator and relevant ethics requirements, and after completion of a data use agreement.