ACDf: Stand Alone Cage Versus Cage Screw Fixation
Anterior Cervical Discectomy Using Stand-Alone Cage Versus Cage-Screw Fixation: Functional Outcomes
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Cervical degenerative disc disease is a common spinal disorder causing significant morbidity worldwide, Patients commonly present with neck pain, cervical radiculopathy, myelopathy, sensory disturbances, motor weakness, and gait abnormalities. Degenerative changes may involve single or multiple cervical levels leading to neural compression and instability, Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is considered the gold standard surgical procedure for treating symptomatic cervical disc disease refractory to conservative treatment, The procedure provides direct decompression of neural structures, restoration of disc height, correction of cervical alignment, and stabilization of the motion segment. Several modifications of ACDF have evolved over the years, Traditional plating systems improve stability and fusion rates but may increase the incidence of dysphagia, soft tissue irritation, and adjacent segment degeneration, Stand-alone cages were introduced to reduce plate-related complications and decrease operative time. Recently, integrated cage-screw fixation systems have gained popularity because they combine the advantages of stand-alone cages with improved immediate fixation and biomechanical stability. Despite many studies comparing these techniques, controversy remains regarding which construct provides superior clinical and radiological outcomes, particularly in multilevel disease.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 14, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 11, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 20, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2026
July 20, 2026
July 1, 2026
4 months
July 11, 2026
July 17, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
VAS score - Clinical Outcome
The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) measures pain intensity. The VAS consists of a 10cm line, with two end points representing 0 ('no pain') and 10 ('pain as bad as it could possibly be'). the patients rate their current level of pain by placing a mark on the line. Use a ruler to measure the distance in centimeters from the 'no pain marker' (or zero) to the current pain mark. This provides a pain intensity score out of 10; for example, 6 out of 10 (or 6/10).
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 months
dysphagia (Bazaz Score) - clinical outcome
dysphagia (Bazaz Score) is a clinical tool used to evaluate difficulty in swallowing (dysphagia). It is primarily used to track swallowing difficulties . severity into four distinct grades Grade 0 (None): No episodes of difficulty swallowing. Grade 1 (Mild): Rare episodes of difficulty swallowing. Grade 2 (Moderate): Occasional swallowing difficulty with solid foods. Grade 3 (Severe): Consistent swallowing difficulty with both solid foods and liquids.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 months
radiological Outcome
cobb angle measurments The Cobb angle is the gold standard measurement used on standing X-rays to quantify the severity of spinal deformities like scoliosis, kyphosis, or lordosis. It measures the intersection of lines drawn along the endplates of the most tilted vertebrae at the top and bottom of a spinal curve. A spinal curvature is only classified as scoliosis if the Cobb angle is greater than 10°. The severity of the curve dictates the treatment path: Mild: 10° to 24° Moderate: 25° to 50° Severe: Greater than 50°.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 months
Study Arms (2)
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and fixation Using Stand-Alone Cage
ACTIVE COMPARATORAnterior Cervical Discectomy and fixation Using Cage-screw
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and fixation by using cage-screw fixation
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and fixation using stand alone cage
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Symptomatic cervical disc disease.
- Single- or multiple-level cervical degenerative disease.
- MRI-confirmed cervical disc prolapse or spondylosis.
- Failure of conservative treatment
You may not qualify if:
- Previous cervical spine surgery.
- Cervical trauma.
- Cervical Infection.
- Cervical Tumors.
- Congenital cervical anomalies.
- Severe Cervical osteoporosis.
- Rheumatoid arthritis.
- Ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament requiring another approach.
- Severe systemic illness preventing surgery.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sohag Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Sohag University
Sohag, 82516, Egypt
Related Publications (4)
Kim MW, Kang CN, Choi SH. Update of the Natural History, Pathophysiology, and Treatment Strategies of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Narrative Review. Asian Spine J. 2023 Feb;17(1):213-221. doi: 10.31616/asj.2022.0440. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
PMID: 36787787RESULTArnautovic A, Mijares J, Begagic E, Ahmetspahic A, Pojskic M. Four-level ACDF surgical series 2000-2022: a systematic review of clinical and radiological outcomes and complications. Br J Neurosurg. 2025 Dec;39(6):750-761. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2024.2337020. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
PMID: 38606493RESULT10) Hwang S, Mun M-H. Relationship of neck disability index, shoulder pain and disability index, and visual analogue scale in individuals with chronic neck pain. Phys Ther Rehabil Sci. 2013; 2:111-4
RESULT2) Zamzam Aberuka, MD, Amr Madkour, MD, Ihab Zidan, MD. Comparative Study Between the Cervical Cage with Screws and the Classical Cage in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. ADVANCED SPINE JOURNAL 2025; 44:31-39
RESULT
Related Links
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Anterior Cervical Discectomy Using Stand-Alone Cage versus Cage-Screw Fixation: Functional Outcomes
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 11, 2026
First Posted
July 20, 2026
Study Start
June 14, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2026
Last Updated
July 20, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07