NCT07713329

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and radiological efficacy of chemical pleural adhesiolysis (using either intrapleural 3% hydrogen peroxide or intrapleural corticosteroids) versus mechanical pleural adhesiolysis (via medical thoracoscopy) in patients with non-malignant, complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion (CPPE). Complicated pleural effusions often lead to the formation of fibrinous septa and adhesions, which impair drainage and prevent lung re-expansion. Standard interventions like tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and DNase can be costly and limited in resource-constrained settings, while thoracoscopic mechanical pleurolysis requires specialized expertise and equipment. The investigators aim to evaluate whether chemical adhesiolysis using accessible, cost-effective agents (hydrogen peroxide or steroids) can offer a comparable and reliable alternative to thoracoscopic mechanical disruption of septa. Efficacy will be assessed using a novel composite clinical and radiological efficiency score evaluated seven days post-procedure.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
36

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2026

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 26, 2026

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 27, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 27, 2026

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 28, 2026

Completed
22 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 20, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

July 20, 2026

Status Verified

July 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

June 28, 2026

Last Update Submit

July 14, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Medical ThoracoscopyPleural EffusionEmpyemaAdhesiolysisPleural DecorticationPleurolysisPleural Adhesions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Composite Radiological Efficiency Score

    Treatment efficiency is evaluated using a study-defined composite clinical/radiological score ranging from 0 to 6. The score integrates 5 domains: (1) Lung volumetric improvement, (2) Diaphragmatic excursion improvement, (3) Pleural thickness reduction, and (4) Drained pleural fluid volume. For these first four domains, a percentage change/improvement from baseline equals or more than 30% is assigned 1 point, while a change \< 30% is assigned 0 points. The 5th domain is Effusion complexity, scored sonographically as: septated = 0, complex = 1, and simple = 2. Higher total scores indicate a greater pleurolytic response, with treatment success classified as a total score equals or more than 5.

    7 days post-intervention

Study Arms (3)

Group A: Hydrogen Peroxide-Mediated Pleurolysis

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants with unilateral complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion randomized to receive intrapleural 3% hydrogen peroxide instilled via an existing intercostal drain.

Drug: Intrapleural Hydrogen Peroxide (H_2O_2)

Group B: Steroid-Mediated Pleurolysis

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants with unilateral complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion randomized to receive intrapleural corticosteroids (dexamethasone or triamcinolone acetonide) instilled via an existing intercostal drain.

Drug: Intrapleural Corticosteroids

Group C: Thoracoscopic Mechanical Pleurolysis

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants with unilateral complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion randomized to undergo medical thoracoscopy for direct vision-guided mechanical disruption of fibrinous septa and adhesions.

Procedure: Thoracoscopic Mechanical Pleurolysis

Interventions

Administered via an existing intercostal drain. Corticosteroid agent used is either Dexamethasone 8 mg or Triamcinolone acetonide 0.3-0.6 mg/kg (approximately 80 mg), diluted in normal saline to a total volume of 250-300 mL. Administered in 2 sessions, spaced 24 hours apart, with a 4-6 hour chest tube clamping window per session.

Group B: Steroid-Mediated Pleurolysis

Performed under local anesthesia and conscious sedation. Involves medical thoracoscopy for direct vision-guided mechanical disruption of fibrinous septa and adhesions, evacuation of loculations, and placement of an intercostal drain.

Group C: Thoracoscopic Mechanical Pleurolysis

Diluted pharmaceutical-grade 3% hydrogen peroxide solution. A total volume of 250-300 mL is instilled via an intercostal chest tube (accounting for tube dead space to deliver approximately 250 mL directly into the pleural cavity). Administered in 2 sessions, spaced 24 hours apart, with a 4-6 hour chest tube clamping window per session.

Group A: Hydrogen Peroxide-Mediated Pleurolysis

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 62 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient age between 18 and 62 years inclusive.
  • Presence of a unilateral complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion (CPPE) requiring pleurolytic intervention.
  • Imaging-confirmed pleural loculation on chest ultrasonography or computed tomography (CT).
  • Pleural fluid biochemical or microbiological indicators of complicated effusion, defined by at least one of the following: pleural fluid pH \< 7.2, glucose \< 60 mg/dL, and/or a positive Gram stain or culture.

You may not qualify if:

  • Confirmed malignant pleural effusion or features highly suggestive of malignancy (e.g., pleural nodularity, circumferential pleural thickening \> 10 mm, mediastinal pleural involvement, or associated pulmonary masses) not yet fully evaluated.
  • Tuberculous pleural effusion.
  • Transudative pleural effusion.
  • Frozen chest syndrome or chronic trapped lung.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Known bleeding diathesis or uncorrected coagulopathy.
  • Patient refusal or inability to provide written informed consent.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Delta university for science and technology

Gamasa, 1234, Egypt

Location

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pleural EffusionEmpyema, PleuralEmpyema

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pleural DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesRespiratory Tract InfectionsInfectionsSuppurationInflammationPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This is a parallel-group, three-arm, pilot randomized controlled clinical trial with a 1:1:1 allocation ratio. Eligible participants are assigned to one of three distinct, independent treatment pathways (Group A: Hydrogen Peroxide, Group B: Corticosteroids, or Group C: Medical Thoracoscopy). Participants remain in their assigned treatment arm for the duration of the 7-day post-procedural assessment period to evaluate comparative efficacy. Crossover to mechanical pleurolysis is strictly reserved as a rescue clinical standard of care for patients who experience chemical treatment failure after data endpoints are established.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 28, 2026

First Posted

July 20, 2026

Study Start

March 26, 2026

Primary Completion

June 27, 2026

Study Completion

June 27, 2026

Last Updated

July 20, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

De-identified individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results reported in the final published manuscript (including text, tables, and figures) will be made available to qualified medical researchers to facilitate secondary academic reviews or meta-analyses.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
Time Frame
Data will become available beginning 6 months after publication of the main trial results and will remain accessible for up to 36 months.
Access Criteria
IPD will be shared upon reasonable formal request directed to the principal investigator. Requests must include a methodologically sound research proposal and a signed data access agreement to ensure ethical compliance.

Locations