Chemical vs Mechanical Pleural Adhesiolysis for Liberation of Captive Pleura in Stacked Effusion
Liberation of Captive Pleura: Chemical Pleural Adhesiolysis Versus Mechanical Pleural Adhesiolysis in Stacked Pleural Effusion
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and radiological efficacy of chemical pleural adhesiolysis (using either intrapleural 3% hydrogen peroxide or intrapleural corticosteroids) versus mechanical pleural adhesiolysis (via medical thoracoscopy) in patients with non-malignant, complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion (CPPE). Complicated pleural effusions often lead to the formation of fibrinous septa and adhesions, which impair drainage and prevent lung re-expansion. Standard interventions like tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and DNase can be costly and limited in resource-constrained settings, while thoracoscopic mechanical pleurolysis requires specialized expertise and equipment. The investigators aim to evaluate whether chemical adhesiolysis using accessible, cost-effective agents (hydrogen peroxide or steroids) can offer a comparable and reliable alternative to thoracoscopic mechanical disruption of septa. Efficacy will be assessed using a novel composite clinical and radiological efficiency score evaluated seven days post-procedure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Mar 2026
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 26, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 27, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 27, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 28, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 20, 2026
CompletedJuly 20, 2026
July 1, 2026
3 months
June 28, 2026
July 14, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Composite Radiological Efficiency Score
Treatment efficiency is evaluated using a study-defined composite clinical/radiological score ranging from 0 to 6. The score integrates 5 domains: (1) Lung volumetric improvement, (2) Diaphragmatic excursion improvement, (3) Pleural thickness reduction, and (4) Drained pleural fluid volume. For these first four domains, a percentage change/improvement from baseline equals or more than 30% is assigned 1 point, while a change \< 30% is assigned 0 points. The 5th domain is Effusion complexity, scored sonographically as: septated = 0, complex = 1, and simple = 2. Higher total scores indicate a greater pleurolytic response, with treatment success classified as a total score equals or more than 5.
7 days post-intervention
Study Arms (3)
Group A: Hydrogen Peroxide-Mediated Pleurolysis
EXPERIMENTALParticipants with unilateral complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion randomized to receive intrapleural 3% hydrogen peroxide instilled via an existing intercostal drain.
Group B: Steroid-Mediated Pleurolysis
EXPERIMENTALParticipants with unilateral complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion randomized to receive intrapleural corticosteroids (dexamethasone or triamcinolone acetonide) instilled via an existing intercostal drain.
Group C: Thoracoscopic Mechanical Pleurolysis
EXPERIMENTALParticipants with unilateral complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion randomized to undergo medical thoracoscopy for direct vision-guided mechanical disruption of fibrinous septa and adhesions.
Interventions
Administered via an existing intercostal drain. Corticosteroid agent used is either Dexamethasone 8 mg or Triamcinolone acetonide 0.3-0.6 mg/kg (approximately 80 mg), diluted in normal saline to a total volume of 250-300 mL. Administered in 2 sessions, spaced 24 hours apart, with a 4-6 hour chest tube clamping window per session.
Performed under local anesthesia and conscious sedation. Involves medical thoracoscopy for direct vision-guided mechanical disruption of fibrinous septa and adhesions, evacuation of loculations, and placement of an intercostal drain.
Diluted pharmaceutical-grade 3% hydrogen peroxide solution. A total volume of 250-300 mL is instilled via an intercostal chest tube (accounting for tube dead space to deliver approximately 250 mL directly into the pleural cavity). Administered in 2 sessions, spaced 24 hours apart, with a 4-6 hour chest tube clamping window per session.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient age between 18 and 62 years inclusive.
- Presence of a unilateral complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion (CPPE) requiring pleurolytic intervention.
- Imaging-confirmed pleural loculation on chest ultrasonography or computed tomography (CT).
- Pleural fluid biochemical or microbiological indicators of complicated effusion, defined by at least one of the following: pleural fluid pH \< 7.2, glucose \< 60 mg/dL, and/or a positive Gram stain or culture.
You may not qualify if:
- Confirmed malignant pleural effusion or features highly suggestive of malignancy (e.g., pleural nodularity, circumferential pleural thickening \> 10 mm, mediastinal pleural involvement, or associated pulmonary masses) not yet fully evaluated.
- Tuberculous pleural effusion.
- Transudative pleural effusion.
- Frozen chest syndrome or chronic trapped lung.
- Pregnancy.
- Known bleeding diathesis or uncorrected coagulopathy.
- Patient refusal or inability to provide written informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Delta university for science and technology
Gamasa, 1234, Egypt
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 28, 2026
First Posted
July 20, 2026
Study Start
March 26, 2026
Primary Completion
June 27, 2026
Study Completion
June 27, 2026
Last Updated
July 20, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- Data will become available beginning 6 months after publication of the main trial results and will remain accessible for up to 36 months.
- Access Criteria
- IPD will be shared upon reasonable formal request directed to the principal investigator. Requests must include a methodologically sound research proposal and a signed data access agreement to ensure ethical compliance.
De-identified individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results reported in the final published manuscript (including text, tables, and figures) will be made available to qualified medical researchers to facilitate secondary academic reviews or meta-analyses.