Validation of AI-Based Detection of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis in Serial Chest Radiographs: A Retrospective Longitudinal Study
Retrospective Evaluation of AI-Based Early Detection of Reticular Opacity in Longitudinal Chest Radiograph Sequences in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
1 other identifier
observational
175
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic, progressive fibrotic lung disease of unknown cause with a median survival of only 3-5 years after diagnosis. Early detection and timely initiation of antifibrotic therapy may improve outcomes, but diagnosis is frequently delayed. Chest radiography (CXR) is widely accessible and cost-effective but has limited sensitivity for early interstitial opacity (IO), so radiologists may miss or delay documentation of relevant findings. This retrospective, single-center, observational cohort study evaluates whether an artificial-intelligence algorithm (VUNO Med-Chest X-ray) can detect interstitial opacity earlier than radiologists in the historical chest radiograph series of patients who were diagnosed with IPF. The cohort was identified via a April 2025 registry screening of patients carrying an IPF diagnosis at Chung-Ang University Hospital. For each patient, the date of the first AI-detected IO (using a pre-specified score cutoff) is compared with the date of the first radiologist-reported mention of interstitial/reticular opacity, across all chest radiographs obtained before the IPF diagnosis date, within a 15-year retrospective imaging window anchored to the April 2025 screening date (January 2010-April 2025). The study also explores patient characteristics that modify this lead-time difference and whether longitudinal AI IO-score trajectories are associated with mortality.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Apr 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 30, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 2, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 20, 2026
CompletedJuly 20, 2026
July 1, 2026
Same day
July 2, 2026
July 13, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Paired lead-time difference (radiologist first-mention date minus AI first-detection date, days)
Delta = radiologist\_detected\_date - ai\_detected\_date, in days. Delta greater than 0 indicates AI detected interstitial opacity earlier than the radiologist; Delta = 0 indicates same-day detection; Delta less than 0 indicates the radiologist detected it earlier. Analyzed in the paired cohort (n=166) using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (zero differences excluded, two-sided), with effect size reported as the Hodges-Lehmann estimate and bootstrap 95% CI (4,000 resamples). Reported measures: median Delta (IQR), Hodges-Lehmann estimate (95% CI), p-value, and the proportional breakdown of AI-earlier / same-day / radiologist-earlier pairs (n, %).
From first available chest radiograph to IPF diagnosis date (retrospective, up to 15 years, anchored to April 2025 registry screening)
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Proportion with AI-earlier detection among discordant pairs
From first available chest radiograph to IPF diagnosis date (retrospective, up to 15 years, anchored to April 2025 registry screening)
Proportion detecting more than 180 days before diagnosis - AI vs. Radiologist
From first available chest radiograph to IPF diagnosis date (retrospective, up to 15 years, anchored to April 2025 registry screening)
Proportion detecting within 180 days before diagnosis - AI vs. Radiologist
From first available chest radiograph to IPF diagnosis date (retrospective, up to 15 years, anchored to April 2025 registry screening)
Sensitivity analysis of the primary lead-time comparison using alternative zero-handling methods
From first available chest radiograph to IPF diagnosis date (retrospective, up to 15 years, anchored to April 2025 registry screening)
Other Outcomes (3)
Kaplan-Meier Time-to-Detection Curves for AI versus Radiologist
From first available chest radiograph to IPF diagnosis date (retrospective, up to 15 years, anchored to April 2025 registry screening)
Time From AI First Detection to Eventual IPF Diagnosis
From first available chest radiograph to IPF diagnosis date (retrospective, up to 15 years, anchored to April 2025 registry screening)
Predictors of the Primary Lead-Time Difference (Regression Coefficients)
From first available chest radiograph to IPF diagnosis date (retrospective, up to 15 years, anchored to April 2025 registry screening)
Study Arms (1)
IPF-diagnosed cohort
Patients with a final diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis at Chung-Ang University Hospital, identified via an April 2025 registry screening, whose historical chest radiograph series obtained before diagnosis (within a 15-year retrospective window, January 2010-April 2025) were retrospectively analyzed by both the AI algorithm and radiology reports.
Interventions
Retrospective, offline application of the AI-based chest radiograph analysis software VUNO Med-Chest X-ray (VUNO Inc., Seoul, Korea) to archival chest radiographs obtained before each patient's IPF diagnosis. The software outputs scores for interstitial opacity(reticular opacity), consolidation, and nodule/mass; interstitial opacity(reticular opacity) score, applying a pre-specified cutoff, is used for the primary and secondary analyses. The AI analysis is performed solely for research purposes and does not inform clinical care.
Eligibility Criteria
Adults aged 19 years or older carrying a final diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF; ICD-10 J84.1 or clinical diagnosis) at Chung-Ang University Hospital, identified via an April 2025 registry screening, with a digital chest radiograph series available before the diagnosis date within the 15-year retrospective imaging window (January 2010-April 2025).
You may qualify if:
- IPF diagnosis on record at Chung-Ang University Hospital as of the April 30, 2025 registry screening, based on imaging findings, pathology results, and clinical information as determined by a pulmonology specialist
- Age greater than or equal to 19 years at IPF diagnosis
- Confirmed diagnosis of IPF (by clinician or multidisciplinary discussion, including CT and/or biopsy)
- Two or more frontal (PA or AP) chest radiographs obtained before the diagnosis date
- DICOM images available and analyzable by VUNO Med-Chest X-ray
- Date of initial IPF diagnosis available
You may not qualify if:
- Only non-frontal chest radiograph views available (e.g., lateral view only)
- One or fewer analyzable chest radiographs
- Missing initial diagnosis date
- No radiology report data available for comparison
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Chung-Ang University Hospitallead
- VUNO Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Chung-Ang University Hospital
Seoul, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kyoungmin Moon
Chung-Ang University Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yoona Hwang
VUNO Inc.
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate professor of Pulmonary and Allergy Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 2, 2026
First Posted
July 20, 2026
Study Start
April 30, 2025
Primary Completion
April 30, 2025
Study Completion
April 30, 2025
Last Updated
July 20, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
This is a retrospective study using data collected under an IRB-approved waiver of informed consent. Individual participant data were not collected with participant consent for sharing with third parties, and no data-sharing infrastructure or de-identification protocol for external release has been established.