Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation and Dual-task Gait Training in Chronic Stroke
Combined Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation and Dual-task Gait Training in Individuals With Chronic Stroke: a Pre-post Study With Exploratory Age-stratified Analyses
1 other identifier
interventional
46
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Rhythmic auditory stimulation and dual-task gait training may improve post-stroke mobility, but evidence regarding integrated programmes and age-related differences in treatment response remains limited. The aim of the study is to evaluate changes in mobility, balance, motor dual-task performance, concern about falling, and health-related quality of life after a six-week combined programme, and to explore whether responses differed across age strata.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable stroke
Started Jan 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 15, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 15, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 15, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 11, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 16, 2026
CompletedJuly 16, 2026
July 1, 2026
4 months
July 11, 2026
July 11, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Motor dual-task performance
Participants completed a 10-m walk at their comfortable speed under single-task and motor dual-task conditions. In the dual-task condition, they carried a ball while walking and were instructed to give equal attention to both tasks. Three trials were performed under each condition, and mean completion time was used in the analysis. Positive values indicated greater dual-task interference.
at baseline and after the six-week programme
Functional mobility
Functional mobility was assessed using the Timed Up and Go test, with shorter completion times indicating better performance. One familiarization trial preceded the timed assessment.
at baseline and after the six-week programme
Balance
Dynamic balance was assessed using the 14-item Mini-BESTest, which evaluates anticipatory postural adjustments, reactive postural control, sensory orientation, and dynamic gait. Total scores range from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating better balance. Static balance was assessed bilaterally using the Single-Leg Stance Test. Two trials were performed on each side, and the longest duration before foot contact, stance-foot movement, or loss of balance was recorded.
at baseline and after the six-week programme
Study Arms (1)
Stroke Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants completed a supervised six-week programme comprising three 30-minute sessions per week (18 sessions; planned dose, 540 minutes). During each session, they synchronized their steps with a metronome while performing tandem walking with progressively demanding object-carrying tasks. Participants maintained their usual walking speed and were instructed to give equal attention to gait and the concurrent motor task. Progression was designed by the research team in accordance with general motor-learning principles and involved predefined weekly increases in metronome tempo and concurrent motor-task complexity.
Interventions
The intervention combined RAS with progressively intensified motor dual-task gait training.6 Participants completed a supervised six-week programme comprising three 30-minute sessions per week (18 sessions; planned dose, 540 minutes). During each session, they synchronized their steps with a metronome while performing tandem walking with progressively demanding object-carrying tasks. Participants maintained their usual walking speed and were instructed to give equal attention to gait and the concurrent motor task. Progression was designed by the research team in accordance with general motor-learning principles and involved predefined weekly increases in metronome tempo and concurrent motor-task complexity. provided that the preceding stage had been completed safely. All sessions were delivered individually by the same licensed physiotherapist experienced in neurology.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age ≥45 years
- stroke ≥6 months previously
- ability to walk at least 10 m independently or with minimal assistance
- sufficient hearing to follow rhythmic auditory cues
You may not qualify if:
- advanced aphasia
- severe neglect, cognitive impairment,
- marked visual impairment,
- severe spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale score15 ≥3)
- severe cardiopulmonary disease
- vestibular dysfunction
- an orthopaedic condition limiting walking
- progressive neurological disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Recep Tayyip Erdogan Universitylead
- İstanbul Yeni Yüzyıl Üniversitesicollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Recep Tayyip Erdogan University
Rize, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- An independent assessor, unaware of previous scores and age-stratum allocation, conducted baseline and post-intervention assessments. Prespecified exploratory analyses compared changes across age strata.
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Assistant Dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 11, 2026
First Posted
July 16, 2026
Study Start
January 15, 2026
Primary Completion
May 15, 2026
Study Completion
May 15, 2026
Last Updated
July 16, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
I do not prefer.