Frequency-Dependent Effects of Transcranial Photobiomodulation on Cortical Excitability
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to investigate the frequency-dependent effects of near-infrared (NIR) transcranial photobiomodulation (tPBM) on human cortical excitability and fine motor performance. A cohort of 20 healthy adult volunteers (aged 18-35 years) will participate in a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, single-center study utilizing a within-subject, five-arm crossover design. Each participant will undergo five distinct experimental conditions separated by a strict washout period: active Continuous Wave (CW) tPBM, active pulsed tPBM at three neural oscillation frequencies (10 Hz, 40 Hz, and 100 Hz), and an inactive Sham comparator. All interventions will be delivered using a clinical-grade near-infrared device. To isolate the specific effects of pulse frequency from overall energy delivery, the total energy dose (cumulative Joules) and total exposure time will be held perfectly constant across all active arms. The pulsed conditions will keeps the average irradiance and cumulative fluence identical to the continuous wave mode. Cortical excitability will be assessed via single- and paired-pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) protocols over the primary motor cortex (M1). Fine motor performance will be quantified using a smartphone-based Finger Tapping Test (FTT). Safety and systemic parameters will be tracked using the Systematic Assessment for Treatment Emergent Events - Systematic Inquiry (SAFTEE-SI) and vital signs. The central hypothesis is that distinct modulation frequencies will differentially influence corticospinal excitability and motor execution, independent of the total energy delivered.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_1
Started May 2027
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 8, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 16, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2027
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2028
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2028
July 28, 2026
July 1, 2026
1 year
July 8, 2026
July 27, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) Amplitude - TMS
Single-pulse TMS will be applied over the primary motor cortex (M1) hotspot to elicit Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) recorded via electromyography (EMG) from the target muscle (e.g., first dorsal interosseous, FDI). Peak-to-peak MEP amplitude (mV) will be measured at a stimulation intensity adjusted to evoke a baseline response of approximately 1 mV. This outcome reflects overall baseline corticospinal excitability and its modulation following the tPBM protocol.
Immediately before the intervention (pre-intervention) and 20 minutes after the intervention (post-intervention)
Intracortical Facilitation (ICF) - TMS
Evaluated using a paired-pulse TMS protocol consisting of a subthreshold conditioning stimulus (80% of resting motor threshold, RMT) followed by a suprathreshold test stimulus (120% RMT) at a long interstimulus interval (ISI) of 10 ms. The outcome is expressed as the ratio of the conditioned MEP amplitude to the unconditioned test MEP amplitude. ICF is primarily mediated by cortical glutamatergic circuits and NMDA receptor activity.
Immediately before the intervention (pre-intervention) and 20 minutes after the intervention (post-intervention)
Short-Interval Intracortical Inhibition (SICI) - TMS
Assessed via a paired-pulse TMS paradigm using a subthreshold conditioning stimulus (80% RMT) followed by a suprathreshold test stimulus (120% RMT) at a short interstimulus interval (ISI) of 3 ms. The resulting SICI value is quantified as the percentage of inhibition of the conditioned MEP relative to the unconditioned test MEP. This parameter indexes local intracortical inhibitory interneuron activity mediated by GABA\_A receptors.
Immediately before the intervention (pre-intervention) and 20 minutes after the intervention (post-intervention)
Cortical Silent Period (CSP) - TMS
Induced by applying a single suprathreshold TMS pulse (120% RMT) over the M1 hotspot while the participant maintains a stable, isometric voluntary contraction of the target muscle (e.g., 20% of maximum voluntary contraction). The CSP duration (ms) is measured from the onset of the MEP to the return of rectified background EMG activity. CSP duration provides a precise marker of interhemispheric and intracortical inhibition mediated by GABA\_B receptors.
Immediately before the intervention (pre-intervention) and 20 minutes after the intervention (post-intervention)
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Total Number of Taps - FTT
Immediately before the intervention (pre-intervention) and immediately after the intervention (post-intervention)
Variability of the Inter-Tap Interval (vITI) - FTT
Immediately before the intervention (pre-intervention) and immediately after the intervention (post-intervention)
Spatial Resultant Sum (Σ||Δr||) - FTT
Immediately before the intervention (pre-intervention) and immediately after the intervention (post-intervention)
95% Confidence Ellipse Area (X,Y) - FTT
Immediately before the intervention (pre-intervention) and immediately after the intervention (post-intervention)
Adverse Events and Tolerability (SAFTEE-SI)
Baseline, before all interventions and one week after the intervention
Other Outcomes (3)
Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)
Immediately before the intervention (pre-intervention) and immediately after the intervention (post-intervention)
Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Immediately before the intervention (pre-intervention) and immediately after the intervention (post-intervention)
Heart Rate (HR)
Immediately before the intervention (pre-intervention) and immediately after the intervention (post-intervention)
Study Arms (5)
Continuous Wave (CW) tPBM
EXPERIMENTALActive near-infrared (NIR) transcranial photobiomodulation delivered in Continuous Wave (CW) mode using the NIR device, providing a constant baseline irradiance to achieve the target total energy dose (J).
10 Hz Pulsed tPBM
EXPERIMENTALActive NIR light delivered in pulsed mode at a frequency of 10 Hz. It matched across frequencies to ensure that the average irradiance (mW/cm2) and total energy dose (J) remain identical to the CW baseline within the same exposure time.
40 Hz Pulsed tPBM
EXPERIMENTALActive NIR light delivered in pulsed mode at a frequency of 40 Hz. It matched across frequencies to ensure that the average irradiance (mW/cm2) and total energy dose (J) remain identical to the CW baseline within the same exposure time.
100 Hz Pulsed tPBM
EXPERIMENTALActive NIR light delivered in pulsed mode at a frequency of 100 Hz. It matched across frequencies to ensure that the average irradiance (mW/cm2) and total energy dose (J) remain identical to the CW baseline within the same exposure time.
Sham Comparator (Sham tPBM)
SHAM COMPARATORInactive transcranial photobiomodulation (tPBM) delivered near-infrared device. To ensure successful participant blinding, the device will be programmed to deliver a minimal, non-therapeutic power output of visible red light (660 nm), which serves as a visual guide mimic but delivers negligible energy to the cortical tissue (0 J of active near-infrared light). Total exposure time, acoustic signals, and equipment interface will be identical to the active arms.
Interventions
Transcranial photobiomodulation (tPBM) is a non-invasive, non-thermal neuromodulatory modality that utilizes low-power coherent (laser) or non-coherent (light-emitting diodes, LEDs) light sources within the red (lambda = 600-700 nm) and near-infrared (NIR; lambda = 700-1100 nm) spectral windows to modulate cortical function. Structurally tailored to penetrate superficial anatomical barriers-including the scalp, skull, and meninges-tPBM delivers photons directly to the cerebral cortex.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Voluntary Participation: Participants who are clear of their cognitive faculties, capable of understanding all experimental procedures, and who provide written informed consent prior to enrollment.
- Neurologically and Psychiatrically Healthy Status: Individuals with no current or prior history of neurological, neurodevelopmental, or psychiatric conditions;
- Age Range: Young adult volunteers aged between 18 and 35 years.
You may not qualify if:
- Use of any continuous psychotropic medication within the past 12 months.
- Any current psychiatric diagnosis based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5).
- Diagnosis of any neurological disorder capable of altering cortical excitability (e.g., seizures/epilepsy, cerebrovascular accidents/stroke, brain tumors).
- Any clinical, psychological, or social condition that, in the investigator's opinion, places the participant at an increased risk, compromises participant safety, or precludes full compliance and successful completion of the study protocol.
- Presence of any intracranial devices or implants, including cochlear implants and aneurysm clips.
- Severe or uncompensated systemic medical illness that could interfere with study participation or confound physiological outcomes.
- Participation in any other interventional neuromodulation study within the preceding 6 months.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marco A Caldieraro, Doctor
Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- To evaluate the integrity of the blinding procedure, a Blinding Index assessment will be conducted at the end of each participant's final experimental session. Participants and the primary investigator will complete a forced-choice questionnaire to guess which intervention (Active or Sham) was administered in each of the five sessions. The success of the blinding protocol will be statistically confirmed if the distribution of correct guesses does not significantly deviate from random chance (p \> 0.05 via chi-square analysis).
- Purpose
- DEVICE FEASIBILITY
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 8, 2026
First Posted
July 16, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
May 1, 2027
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2028
Last Updated
July 28, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share