NCT07706491

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a new handle design for the uresta pessary works better than the current handle design for women when they are using the pessary. The main questions it aims to answer are: Is the new pessary equally effective for users. Do pessary users find the new handle design is more or less helpful for insertion and removal of the pessary Is the optional removal string, provided with the new handle, helpful in pessary handling. The participants will use both the original and the new uresta pessary handle designs and complete a questionnaire to rate both handles. The score for the two questionnaires will be compared to determine which handle is best.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
113

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 20, 2026

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 18, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 18, 2026

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 3, 2026

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 15, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

July 15, 2026

Status Verified

July 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

July 3, 2026

Last Update Submit

July 9, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

stress urinary incontinenceuresta pessaryhandle design

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • questionnaire

    A 15 item questionnaire in which each question is anwered on a 5-point likert scale ranging from "strongly disagree"=1 to strongly agree = 5. The higher the score the better the usability and efficacy

    From enrolment to completion at 4 weeks

  • Paired samples t-test

    The scores of each questionnaire will be summed and the mean scores on the pessary handle questionnaires will be compared using a paired samples t-test with a p\<0.05 considered significant

    from enrollment to completion at 4 weeks

Study Arms (1)

pessary handle comparison arm

OTHER

single arm, sequential use of two pessary handle designs

Device: pessary handle

Interventions

the participants will use two pessary handle designs as well as an optional pessary puller string and complete questionnaires to rate their experience

pessary handle comparison arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult women aged 18 years or older
  • Currently using a Uresta bladder support successfully
  • Using size 3, 4, or 5 from the Uresta Starter Kit
  • Living in the United States
  • Able to participate within 10-20 days of consent
  • Willing to complete study questionnaires and use the modified device

You may not qualify if:

  • Individuals not residing in the United States
  • Individuals not currently using Uresta
  • Individuals using sizes other than 3, 4, or 5
  • Individuals unable to complete study activities within the study timeline
  • Pregnant women

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Stirling IRB

Atlanta, Georgia, 30339, United States

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Farrell SA, Baydock S, Amir B, Fanning C. Effectiveness of a new self-positioning pessary for the management of urinary incontinence in women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 May;196(5):474.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.11.038.

    PMID: 17466709BACKGROUND
  • Lovatsis D, Best C, Diamond P. Short-term Uresta efficacy (SURE) study: a randomized controlled trial of the Uresta continence device. Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Jan;28(1):147-150. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3090-9. Epub 2016 Jul 20.

    PMID: 27438055BACKGROUND
  • Campbell P, Moran K, Boyle S, Gallagher C. Compliance with Uresta (CURE) study; a 12 month follow-up of 40 women. Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Mar;34(3):737-744. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05234-1. Epub 2022 May 27.

    PMID: 35624166BACKGROUND
  • Farrell SA, Gillespie K, Foulem S, Lagace S. A Self-Selection Validation Study of the Uresta Bladder Support. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2025 Nov;47(11):103085. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2025.103085. Epub 2025 Sep 1.

    PMID: 40902949BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Urinary Incontinence, Stress

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Urinary IncontinenceUrination DisordersUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesLower Urinary Tract SymptomsUrological ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Scott Farrell, MD

    Dalhousie University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Model Details: single cohort, sequential use study
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor Emeritus

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 3, 2026

First Posted

July 15, 2026

Study Start

April 20, 2026

Primary Completion

June 18, 2026

Study Completion

June 18, 2026

Last Updated

July 15, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-07

Locations