A Study of Two Versions of the Uresta Pessary Handle for Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence
A Uresta Bladder Support Handle Comparison Study
1 other identifier
interventional
113
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a new handle design for the uresta pessary works better than the current handle design for women when they are using the pessary. The main questions it aims to answer are: Is the new pessary equally effective for users. Do pessary users find the new handle design is more or less helpful for insertion and removal of the pessary Is the optional removal string, provided with the new handle, helpful in pessary handling. The participants will use both the original and the new uresta pessary handle designs and complete a questionnaire to rate both handles. The score for the two questionnaires will be compared to determine which handle is best.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 20, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 18, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 18, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 3, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 15, 2026
CompletedJuly 15, 2026
July 1, 2026
2 months
July 3, 2026
July 9, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
questionnaire
A 15 item questionnaire in which each question is anwered on a 5-point likert scale ranging from "strongly disagree"=1 to strongly agree = 5. The higher the score the better the usability and efficacy
From enrolment to completion at 4 weeks
Paired samples t-test
The scores of each questionnaire will be summed and the mean scores on the pessary handle questionnaires will be compared using a paired samples t-test with a p\<0.05 considered significant
from enrollment to completion at 4 weeks
Study Arms (1)
pessary handle comparison arm
OTHERsingle arm, sequential use of two pessary handle designs
Interventions
the participants will use two pessary handle designs as well as an optional pessary puller string and complete questionnaires to rate their experience
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult women aged 18 years or older
- Currently using a Uresta bladder support successfully
- Using size 3, 4, or 5 from the Uresta Starter Kit
- Living in the United States
- Able to participate within 10-20 days of consent
- Willing to complete study questionnaires and use the modified device
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals not residing in the United States
- Individuals not currently using Uresta
- Individuals using sizes other than 3, 4, or 5
- Individuals unable to complete study activities within the study timeline
- Pregnant women
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Resilia Inc.lead
Study Sites (1)
Stirling IRB
Atlanta, Georgia, 30339, United States
Related Publications (4)
Farrell SA, Baydock S, Amir B, Fanning C. Effectiveness of a new self-positioning pessary for the management of urinary incontinence in women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 May;196(5):474.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.11.038.
PMID: 17466709BACKGROUNDLovatsis D, Best C, Diamond P. Short-term Uresta efficacy (SURE) study: a randomized controlled trial of the Uresta continence device. Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Jan;28(1):147-150. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3090-9. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
PMID: 27438055BACKGROUNDCampbell P, Moran K, Boyle S, Gallagher C. Compliance with Uresta (CURE) study; a 12 month follow-up of 40 women. Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Mar;34(3):737-744. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05234-1. Epub 2022 May 27.
PMID: 35624166BACKGROUNDFarrell SA, Gillespie K, Foulem S, Lagace S. A Self-Selection Validation Study of the Uresta Bladder Support. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2025 Nov;47(11):103085. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2025.103085. Epub 2025 Sep 1.
PMID: 40902949BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Scott Farrell, MD
Dalhousie University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor Emeritus
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 3, 2026
First Posted
July 15, 2026
Study Start
April 20, 2026
Primary Completion
June 18, 2026
Study Completion
June 18, 2026
Last Updated
July 15, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07