NCT07704983

Brief Summary

Dental fluorosis can cause visible chalky-white spots on the front teeth. These white spot lesions may affect dental appearance even when the tooth surface is intact. This randomized clinical trial compared two minimally invasive approaches for masking fluorotic white spot lesions on permanent anterior teeth. Eligible teeth were randomly assigned to receive either resin infiltration or enamel microabrasion followed by application of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP). The main outcomes were the color difference between the white spot lesion and the surrounding sound enamel and the proportion of the visible tooth surface occupied by the lesion. These outcomes were evaluated from standardized clinical photographs before treatment, after treatment, and during follow-up through 6 months.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
42

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2023

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2023

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2025

Completed
1 year until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 10, 2026

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 15, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

July 15, 2026

Status Verified

July 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2.1 years

First QC Date

July 10, 2026

Last Update Submit

July 10, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Fluorotic White Spot LesionsResin InfiltrationCPP-ACPAnterior TeethMinimally Invasive Dentistry

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • CIELAB Color Difference Between the Fluorotic Lesion and Adjacent Sound Enamel

    The color difference between the fluorotic white spot lesion and adjacent sound enamel was measured from standardized clinical photographs in the CIELab\* color space. Mean L\*, a\*, and b\* values were obtained from three points within the lesion and three points on adjacent sound enamel located 2 mm from the lesion margin. Color difference was calculated as ΔE = \[(ΔL\*)² + (Δa\*)² + (Δb\*)²\]¹ᐟ². Lower ΔE values indicate better color matching and lesion masking. A ΔE value below 3.7 was considered not clinically perceptible to the naked eye.

    At baseline and four post-treatment assessments through 6 months (T0-T4)

  • Fluorotic Lesion-Area Ratio on the Labial Tooth Surface

    The fluorotic white spot lesion and the visible labial tooth surface were outlined on standardized clinical photographs and measured using ImageJ. The lesion-area ratio was calculated as R (%) = (lesion area / total visible labial surface area) × 100. Scores range from 0% to 100%, with lower values indicating a smaller visible lesion area and better lesion masking.

    At baseline and four post-treatment assessments through 6 months (T0-T4)

Study Arms (2)

Resin Infiltration

EXPERIMENTAL

Eligible fluorotic white spot lesions were treated with resin infiltration using the ICON Vestibular Kit. After rubber-dam isolation, 15% hydrochloric acid was applied for 120 seconds, rinsed for 30 seconds, and air-dried. Ethanol was applied for 30 seconds, and the etching step was repeated if needed. The resin infiltrant was then applied, excess material was removed, and the surface was light-cured according to the study protocol.

Procedure: Resin infiltration

Microabrasion Plus CPP-ACP

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Eligible fluorotic white spot lesions were treated with enamel microabrasion followed by CPP-ACP application. Opalustre containing 6.6% hydrochloric acid and silicon carbide particles was applied to the labial enamel surface and polished with a rubber cup at approximately 500 rpm for 60 seconds. The procedure was repeated for five cycles, followed by application of CPP-ACP gel for 5 minutes.

Procedure: Enamel Microabrasion Plus CPP-ACP

Interventions

After tooth cleaning and rubber-dam isolation, 15% hydrochloric acid was applied to the fluorotic white spot lesion for 120 seconds, rinsed for 30 seconds, and air-dried. Ethanol was applied for 30 seconds to assess lesion masking, and the etching step was repeated if the lesion remained visible. A low-viscosity resin infiltrant was applied for 180 seconds, excess material was removed, and the surface was light-cured for 40 seconds. A second application was performed for 60 seconds and light-cured for an additional 40 seconds.

Resin Infiltration

After tooth cleaning and rubber-dam isolation, an enamel microabrasion material containing 6.6% hydrochloric acid and silicon carbide particles was applied to the labial enamel surface and polished with a rubber cup at approximately 500 rpm for 60 seconds. The surface was rinsed, and the procedure was repeated for five cycles. CPP-ACP paste was then applied to the treated enamel surface for 5 minutes.

Microabrasion Plus CPP-ACP

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients presenting with fluorotic white spot lesions on permanent anterior teeth.
  • Shallow fluorotic white spot lesions confined to the outer enamel.
  • Chalky-white lesions with a clear border from adjacent sound enamel.
  • Lesions appearing bright on oblique visual inspection and mildly dim under diagnostic transillumination.
  • Clinical diagnosis of dental fluorosis based on the characteristic bilateral, symmetrical, and diffuse distribution of enamel opacities.
  • Willingness to participate in the study and comply with treatment and follow-up visits.

You may not qualify if:

  • Deep subsurface enamel lesions.
  • Lesions consistent with molar-incisor hypomineralization.
  • Lesions with yellow or brown discoloration.
  • Known allergy or hypersensitivity to ICON, Opalustre, Tooth Mousse, or their components.
  • Inability to tolerate rubber-dam isolation.
  • Poor oral hygiene.
  • Inability or unwillingness to attend the scheduled follow-up assessments.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Faculty of Odonto-Stomatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University

Huế, 530000, Vietnam

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Fluorosis, Dental

Interventions

Enamel Microabrasioncasein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate nanocomplex

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Dental Enamel HypomineralizationDevelopmental Defects of EnamelTooth AbnormalitiesStomatognathic System AbnormalitiesStomatognathic DiseasesTooth DiseasesCongenital AbnormalitiesCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Esthetics, DentalDentistry

Study Officials

  • Van Nhat Thang Le, DDS PhD

    Faculty of Odonto-Stomatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 10, 2026

First Posted

July 15, 2026

Study Start

June 1, 2023

Primary Completion

June 30, 2025

Study Completion

June 30, 2025

Last Updated

July 15, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations