Custom-made Zirconia Crowns Versus Prefabricated Zirconia Crowns in Young Permanent Molars
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to compare the clinical performance of Prefabricated Zirconia Crowns (PZCs) with that of Custom-made Zirconia Crowns (CZCs) using enhanced clinical protocols.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 25, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 15, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2027
July 15, 2026
July 1, 2026
2.4 years
March 25, 2026
July 9, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Rate of Crown retention
Visual-tactile evaluation of the crown retention over time (crown present, loose or lost).
3,6 and 12 months
Rate of chipping and fracture of the crown
Clinical evaluation for the presence/absence of crown chipping or fracture
3,6 and 12 months
Gingival health
Clinical evaluation of the gingival inflammation ( the gingival index (GI) by Löe \& Silness 1963 )
3,6 and 12 months
Clinical crown margin extension
Visual-tactile evaluation for crown margin extension (supra/ equi/sub-- gingival)
3,6 and 12 months
Radiographic crown margin adaptation
Evaluation of crown margin adaptation (Geduk et al., 2023)
6 and 12 months
Clinical crown margin adaptation
Clinical evaluation of crown margin using an explorer (Geduk et al., 2023)
3,6 and 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Time taken for intervention
Perioperative/Periprocedural: from the beginning of tooth preparation and until the crown is cemented.
Patient satisfaction
immediately following intervention.
Patient's comfort
peri-operatively
Study Arms (2)
Prefabricated Zirconia Crowns
EXPERIMENTALTooth preparation and cementation of a suitable size of prefabricated Zirconia crown.
Custom-made Zirconia Crowns
EXPERIMENTALTooth preparation, followed by oral scanning and production and cementation of a zirconia crown using CAD-CAM technology.
Interventions
Tooth preparation as per the manufacturer's instructions and cementation of a suitable size of prefabricated Zirconia crown using self-adhesive resin cement.
Tooth preparation (1-1.5 mm occlusal, 0.5 to 1.25 mm circumferential, with a shoulder-edge supra-gingival margin), followed by scanning with an intra-oral scanner, then temporisation. A zirconia crown will be produced using CAD-CAM technology and cemented with a self-adhesive resin cement on a different visit.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Medically fit or with mild systemic illness (ASA I or II).
- Children who assent to take part in the study with a valid parental consent
- Children who have at least one first permanent molar requiring a full-coverage restoration (indications for placing a crown include: badly destructed/carious molars, or teeth affected by molar-incisor hypomineralisation (MIH))
- Maxillary or mandibular fully erupted first permanent molars, regardless of the stage of root development.
- A cooperative child that accepts dental treatment (Frankle Behaviour Rating Scale #3 or 4).
- Capable of attending all follow-up sessions.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients outside the required age range
- Parents/child not willing to participate.
- Medically compromised patients
- Partially erupted permanent first molars.
- Patients with severe malocclusion that prohibits the provision of crowns
- First permanent molars are not indicated for full coverage restorations.
- First permanent molars are indicated for extraction.
- Patients with bruxism or parafunctional habits.
- Uncooperative children (Frankle Behaviour Rating Scale #1 or 2)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Jordan University of Science and Technology
Irbid, Jordan
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 25, 2026
First Posted
July 15, 2026
Study Start
August 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Last Updated
July 15, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07