Pain During Infiltration Injection in Anterior Maxillary Region by Transcodent Painless Needle Tips Versus Regular Needle Tips
Comparison of Pain During Infiltration Injection in Anterior Maxillary Region by Transcodent Painless Needle Tips Versus Regular Needle Tips: a Split-mouth Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
60
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This randomized split-mouth controlled clinical trial will compare pain experienced during anterior maxillary infiltration anesthesia using Transcodent painless needle tips and conventional dental needle tips. Sixty adult patients requiring bilateral maxillary anterior infiltration anesthesia will receive injections with both needle types in a randomized order. Pain perception will be assessed immediately after each injection using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The study aims to determine whether the Transcodent needle tip reduces injection-related pain compared with a conventional needle tip, thereby improving patient comfort during routine dental procedures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable pain
Started Jun 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable pain
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 23, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 23, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 23, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 14, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 15, 2026
CompletedJuly 14, 2026
July 1, 2026
Same day
June 23, 2026
July 11, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain Score During Anterior Maxillary Infiltration Injection
Pain perception measured using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 indicates no pain and 100 indicates the worst imaginable pain. Pain scores will be recorded immediately after administration of infiltration anesthesia using either a Transcodent
Immediately after each injection
Study Arms (2)
Sequence A: Transcodent Needle First
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive anterior maxillary infiltration anesthesia using a Transcodent painless needle tip with a three-edge lancet grinding bevel and silicone-coated cannula. Pain is assessed immediately after injection using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Sequence B: Conventional Needle First
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive anterior maxillary infiltration anesthesia using a conventional dental needle tip. Pain is assessed immediately after injection using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Interventions
A dental injection needle with a three-edge lancet grinding bevel and silicone-coated cannula designed to reduce tissue resistance and injection pain during anterior maxillary infiltration anesthesia.
A standard dental injection needle with a conventional bevel design used for anterior maxillary infiltration anesthesia.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults aged 18 to 60 years. Patients requiring bilateral maxillary anterior infiltration anesthesia for dental treatment.
- Patients undergoing endodontic procedures involving maxillary canines or premolars.
- Presence of healthy maxillary teeth on both sides suitable for infiltration anesthesia.
- Individuals with no systemic disease or neurological disorder affecting pain perception.
- Ability to understand the study procedures and provide written informed consent.
- Both male and female participants.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant or lactating women. Use of analgesics, sedatives, or other pain-modifying medications within the previous 12 hours.
- Known allergy or hypersensitivity to local anesthetics, benzocaine, lidocaine, or epinephrine.
- Presence of active infection, inflammation, swelling, or pathology at the injection site.
- Severe dental anxiety, needle phobia, or inability to cooperate with study procedures.
- Individuals unable or unwilling to provide informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Azra Umar
Saidu College of Dentistry, Swat, Paksitan
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Rationale: The operator administering the injections knows which needle is being used. The protocol does not specify participant blinding or blinded outcome assessment.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 23, 2026
First Posted
July 14, 2026
Study Start
June 23, 2026
Primary Completion
June 23, 2026
Study Completion
July 15, 2026
Last Updated
July 14, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data collected during this study will not be made publicly available because of confidentiality and privacy considerations. De-identified aggregate study results will be reported in scientific publications and presentations.