Comparative Study to Evaluate Microbial Versus Porcine Pancreatic Enzyme Therapy in Chronic Pancreatitis
NP-PERT
A Randomised, Double-Blind, Non-Inferiority Trial Comparing Microbial and Porcine Pancreatic Enzyme Replacement Therapy in Chronic Pancreatitis
1 other identifier
interventional
134
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Background: Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a progressive inflammatory disorder causing irreversible pancreatic damage, eventually resulting in pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI). This may lead to malabsorption, malnutrition, weight loss, and impaired quality of life. Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) is the standard treatment for PEI and is predominantly derived from porcine sources. However, religious, ethical, dietary, and supply-related concerns highlight the need for effective non-porcine alternatives. Microbial (fungal)-based pancreatic enzymes have shown promising safety and efficacy in preliminary studies, but evidence in CP remains limited. Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of non-porcine microbial (fungal)-based pancreatin with standard porcine-based pancreatin in patients with PEI secondary to CP. Methods: This investigator-initiated, randomized, double-blind, single-center, non-inferiority trial will enroll 134 adults with CP-associated PEI (defined as having a fecal elastase \<100 µg/g). After a two-week washout period, participants will be randomized 1:1 to receive either microbial-based or porcine-based pancreatin for 12 weeks. The primary outcome is the change from baseline in the Pancreatic Exocrine Insufficiency Questionnaire (PEI-Q) score at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes include nutritional status, anthropometric measures, gastrointestinal symptoms, pain scores, stool consistency, glycaemic parameters, laboratory markers, and quality of life. Discussion: This study aims to evaluate whether microbial-based pancreatin is non-inferior to porcine-based therapy and may provide a culturally acceptable and sustainable alternative for managing CP-related PEI.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Aug 2026
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 5, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 13, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2027
July 13, 2026
July 1, 2026
10 months
July 5, 2026
July 5, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Pancreatic Exocrine Insufficiency Questionnaire (PEI-Q) score
The PEI-Q is a validated questionnaire that captures several symptoms related to exocrine pancreatic insufficiency and the result is presented as a composite score.
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (28)
Change in nutritional status: Subjective global assessment
3 months
Change in nutritional status: Body weight
3 months
Change in nutritional status: Anthropometry
3 months
Change in nutritional status: Anthropometry
3 months
Change in nutritional status: Anthropomentry
3 months
- +23 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Non-porcine microbial (fungal) based pancreatic enzyme preparation
EXPERIMENTALThe non-porcine microbial enzyme preparation will contain amylase (6650 DU), lipase (13000 FIP), and protease (7120 HUT, 15 SAPU, 3000 PC)
Standard of care porcine pancreatic enzyme
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe standard of care porcine-based enzyme preparation will contain amylase (8000 U), lipase (25000 U), and protease (1000 U)
Interventions
Dietary Supplement: Pancreatic enzyme preparation from microbial (fungal) source that contains amylase (6650 DU), lipase (13000 FIP), and protease (7120 HUT, 15 SAPU, 3000 PC).
Standard of care porcine pancreatic enzyme preparation: amylase (8000 U), lipase (25000 U), and protease (1000 U)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- CP fulfilling the M-ANNHEIM criteria 11 with documented PEI (defined as fecal elastase \<100 µg/g stool on the background of morphological changes of CP).
- Willingness to undergo a 2-week wash-out period without pancreatic enzyme therapy before enrolment.
- Willing and able to provide written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Major psychiatric illness impairing study participation.
- Systemic illness affecting digestion or study outcomes.
- Any condition deemed unsuitable for study participation by the investigator.
- Concurrent acute exacerbation of the CP at the time of screening.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Aalborg Universitycollaborator
- Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Indialead
Related Publications (12)
Rentz AM, Kahrilas P, Stanghellini V, Tack J, Talley NJ, de la Loge C, Trudeau E, Dubois D, Revicki DA. Development and psychometric evaluation of the patient assessment of upper gastrointestinal symptom severity index (PAGI-SYM) in patients with upper gastrointestinal disorders. Qual Life Res. 2004 Dec;13(10):1737-49. doi: 10.1007/s11136-004-9567-x.
PMID: 15651544BACKGROUNDBlake MR, Raker JM, Whelan K. Validity and reliability of the Bristol Stool Form Scale in healthy adults and patients with diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Oct;44(7):693-703. doi: 10.1111/apt.13746. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
PMID: 27492648BACKGROUNDRathnayake N, Abeygunasekara T, Liyanage G, Subasinghe S, De Zoysa W, Palangasinghe D, Lekamwasam S. SARC-F: an effective screening tool for detecting sarcopenia and predicting health-related quality of life in older women in Sri Lanka. BMC Geriatr. 2025 Feb 25;25(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05786-z.
PMID: 40000973BACKGROUNDDetsky AS, McLaughlin JR, Baker JP, Johnston N, Whittaker S, Mendelson RA, Jeejeebhoy KN. What is subjective global assessment of nutritional status? 1987. Classical article. Nutr Hosp. 2008 Jul-Aug;23(4):400-7. No abstract available.
PMID: 18702178BACKGROUNDJohnson CD, Arbuckle R, Bonner N, Connett G, Dominguez-Munoz E, Levy P, Staab D, Williamson N, Lerch MM. Qualitative Assessment of the Symptoms and Impact of Pancreatic Exocrine Insufficiency (PEI) to Inform the Development of a Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Instrument. Patient. 2017 Oct;10(5):615-628. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0233-0.
PMID: 28332032BACKGROUNDSalhi A, Amara S, Mansuelle P, Puppo R, Lebrun R, Gontero B, Aloulou A, Carriere F. Characterization of all the lipolytic activities in pancreatin and comparison with porcine and human pancreatic juices. Biochimie. 2020 Feb;169:106-120. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2019.07.004. Epub 2019 Jul 6.
PMID: 31288050BACKGROUNDChan AW, Boutron I, Hopewell S, Moher D, Schulz KF, Collins GS, Tunn R, Aggarwal R, Berkwits M, Berlin JA, Bhandari N, Butcher NJ, Campbell MK, Chidebe RCW, Elbourne DR, Farmer AJ, Fergusson DA, Golub RM, Goodman SN, Hoffmann TC, Ioannidis JPA, Kahan BC, Knowles RL, Lamb SE, Lewis S, Loder E, Offringa M, Ravaud P, Richards DP, Rockhold FW, Schriger DL, Siegfried NL, Staniszewska S, Taylor RS, Thabane L, Torgerson DJ, Vohra S, White IR, Hrobjartsson A. SPIRIT 2025 Statement: Updated Guideline for Protocols of Randomized Trials. JAMA. 2025 Aug 5;334(5):435-443. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.4486.
PMID: 40294593BACKGROUNDGan C, Chen YH, Liu L, Gao JH, Tong H, Tang CW, Liu R. Efficacy and safety of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy on exocrine pancreatic insufficiency: a meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2017 Oct 7;8(55):94920-94931. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.21659. eCollection 2017 Nov 7.
PMID: 29212278BACKGROUNDde la Iglesia-Garcia D, Huang W, Szatmary P, Baston-Rey I, Gonzalez-Lopez J, Prada-Ramallal G, Mukherjee R, Nunes QM, Dominguez-Munoz JE, Sutton R; NIHR Pancreas Biomedical Research Unit Patient Advisory Group. Efficacy of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy in chronic pancreatitis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut. 2017 Aug;66(8):1354-1355. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312529. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
PMID: 27941156BACKGROUNDLayer P, Yamamoto H, Kalthoff L, Clain JE, Bakken LJ, DiMagno EP. The different courses of early- and late-onset idiopathic and alcoholic chronic pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 1994 Nov;107(5):1481-7. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(94)90553-3.
PMID: 7926511BACKGROUNDConwell DL, Lee LS, Yadav D, Longnecker DS, Miller FH, Mortele KJ, Levy MJ, Kwon R, Lieb JG, Stevens T, Toskes PP, Gardner TB, Gelrud A, Wu BU, Forsmark CE, Vege SS. American Pancreatic Association Practice Guidelines in Chronic Pancreatitis: evidence-based report on diagnostic guidelines. Pancreas. 2014 Nov;43(8):1143-62. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000237.
PMID: 25333398BACKGROUNDWhitcomb DC, Frulloni L, Garg P, Greer JB, Schneider A, Yadav D, Shimosegawa T. Chronic pancreatitis: An international draft consensus proposal for a new mechanistic definition. Pancreatology. 2016 Mar-Apr;16(2):218-24. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
PMID: 26924663BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rupjyoti Talukdar, MD
Asian Institute of Gastroenterology
Central Study Contacts
Abdul Rasheed, PharmD
CONTACT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director, Pancreatology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 5, 2026
First Posted
July 13, 2026
Study Start
August 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2027
Last Updated
July 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07