NCT07696156

Brief Summary

Medical and technological advancements allow increasingly complex invasive procedures to be performed on hospitalized patients, improving their survival rates and prognosis. However, these interventions impact physical, emotional, and psychological health. In this scenario, post-hospitalization syndrome (PHS) emerges as a concerning phenomenon characterized by functional, emotional, and social decline after discharge. Invasive procedures such as surgeries or prolonged use of catheters not only compromise physical integrity but also contribute to disorders like anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress. In fact, between 20% and 30% of patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) develop symptoms compatible with post-traumatic stress disorder. This underscores the need for a comprehensive approach focused on psychological and social well-being during and after the hospital stay. Despite humanization initiatives, few hospitals successfully implement them due to a lack of objective evaluations and clinical recommendations that justify their necessity. In this regard, venous catheterization (VC) is the most prevalent invasive procedure. The pain, anxiety, or fear caused by this technique triggers physiological and psychological alterations that can interfere with the successful insertion of the device. This stress response induces vasoconstriction, reducing the caliber of the vein, which increases technical difficulty, elevates the risk of complications, raises healthcare costs, and negatively impacts patient satisfaction. Natural outdoor environments have been shown to reduce stress, enhancing well-being and health in the general population. In this sense, the use of immersive virtual reality (IVR) to achieve immersion in virtual nature could help not only by diverting attention away from the painful or anxiety-inducing stimulus during invasive procedures but also by providing pleasant stimuli that could have a physiological impact. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of IVR on stress and anxiety during VC using validated clinical scales, measuring the caliber of the vessel to be punctured, and determining salivary biomarkers of stress, well-being, and pain. Confirming this hypothesis will provide the evidence to integrate virtual reality into the National Health System as a standard tool for more humanized and innovative care.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
202

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
24mo left

Started Jan 2027

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

4 active sites

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 22, 2026

Completed
18 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 10, 2026

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 15, 2027

Expected
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 12, 2028

1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 12, 2029

Last Updated

July 10, 2026

Status Verified

June 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

June 22, 2026

Last Update Submit

July 8, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

anxietypainVirtual RealityPICCInvasive ProceduresMetabolomicsHPA Axis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Self-Reported Procedural Anxiety Level

    Measured using the Visual Analog Scale for Anxiety (VAS-A), validated in pre-surgical procedures (Facco et al., 2013), which shows a statistically significant correlation with the STAI-State scale (considered the gold standard). The scale consists of a 10 cm horizontal line where patients select the point that indicates their anxiety intensity. Scores range from 0 to 10, defined as follows: 0 indicates no anxiety (left end); \> 0 and ≤ 2 indicates mild anxiety; \> 2 and ≤ 5 indicates moderate anxiety; \> 5 and ≤ 8 indicates severe anxiety; and \> 8 and ≤ 10 indicates the most severe anxiety (right end)

    Baseline (Day 1, prior to catheter insertion), Periprocedural (Day 1, pre-puncture), and Day 1 (immediately upon completion of the implantation).

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Self-Reported Procedural Pain Intensity

    Baseline (Day 1, prior to the procedure) and Day 1 (immediately upon completion of the implantation)

  • Salivary HPA-Axis Metabolites

    Baseline (Day 1, prior to the procedure) and Day 1 (30 minutes post-implantation); with a total elapsed time between both samples of less than 2 hours

  • Vein Diameter Variation

    Baseline (Day 1, at rest prior to the procedure) and Periprocedural (Day 1, at the exact moment of needle puncture)

  • Patient Satisfaction with the Care Received

    Day 1 (30 minutes post-catheter implantation)

  • Clinical Feasibility and Usability of the ESTAR-VR Program

    At study completion (an average of 1 year)

Study Arms (2)

Standard Procedural Care

OTHER

Hospitalized patients undergoing PICC or Midline catheter insertion who receive the standard institutional nursing protocol for vascular access insertion without any virtual reality intervention.

Device: Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC)Drug: Mepivacaine 2% InjectionDrug: Chlorhexidine Gluconate 2%

Immersive Virtual Reality (IVR)

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in this group will receive standard care from the infusion and vascular access nurses responsible for catheter implantation. The procedure includes sterile field preparation and the standard institutional nursing protocol throughout the entire PICC or Midline catheter insertion. Participants in this group will undergo the same vascular access insertion and clinical monitoring as the control group, but with the use of virtual reality headsets.

Other: Immersive Virtual RealityDevice: Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC)Drug: Mepivacaine 2% InjectionDrug: Chlorhexidine Gluconate 2%

Interventions

The intervention consists of an immersive virtual reality (IVR) software designed to provide continuous non-pharmacological distraction during vascular access. Patients can choose from three distinct natural theme environments: 1) Sensory Forest with views of hot air balloons; 2) Sunrises, Sunsets, and Night Sky / Aurora Borealis; and 3) Underwater Experience. The content is delivered via standalone VR headsets. The experience is administered continuously from prior to the sterile field preparation until the end of the PICC or Midline catheter insertion, adjusting its duration to the length of the procedure.

Immersive Virtual Reality (IVR)

Placement of a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or a Midline catheter made of polyurethane, depending on the patient's clinical indication and venous capital. The procedure is performed by trained vascular access nurses using ultrasound guidance for vein selection and puncture (typically the basilic or brachial vein). The catheter insertion follows the Modified Seldinger Technique under strict sterile conditions. The device may have single, double, or triple lumens, with a caliber ranging from 3Fr to 5Fr. For PICC lines, the correct tip position in the lower third of the superior vena cava is verified using intracavitary ECG or post-procedure chest X-ray.

Immersive Virtual Reality (IVR)Standard Procedural Care

Subcutaneous local anesthetic administered at the puncture site prior to vein needle insertion to minimize procedural pain

Immersive Virtual Reality (IVR)Standard Procedural Care

Topical antiseptic agent applied to the skin at the insertion site for preoperative skin preparation and antisepsis

Immersive Virtual Reality (IVR)Standard Procedural Care

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsMan / Woman / Non-binary / Prefer not to answer
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients ≥ 18 years old
  • Patients undergoing first-time CVC or Midline catheter insertion

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with cognitive impairment
  • Communication barriers
  • Acute pain (VAS \> 3)
  • Epilepsy
  • Brain neoplasm or brain metastases
  • Previous or simultaneous invasive procedures

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

Hospital del Mar

Barcelona, Barcelona, 08003, Spain

Location

Hospital del Mar

Barcelona, Barcelona, 08003, Spain

Location

Fundació Althaia

Manresa, Barcelona, 08240, Spain

Location

Hospital Universitari de Girona Doctor Josep Trueta

Girona, Girona, 17007, Spain

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

PainAnxiety Disorders

Interventions

Catheterization, PeripheralMepivacaineInjections

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

CatheterizationTherapeuticsEndovascular ProceduresVascular Surgical ProceduresCardiovascular Surgical ProceduresSurgical Procedures, OperativeMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresInvestigative TechniquesPiperidinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsDrug Administration RoutesDrug Therapy

Study Officials

  • Purificación Study Director

    Hospital del Mar

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Diana Lead Trial Coordinator, PhD Candidate

CONTACT

Elisabeth Lafuente Cabrero, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This is a multicenter, two-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial conducted across three university hospitals in Catalonia (Spain) that feature a dedicated Infusion and Vascular Access Unit (UIAV). Hospitalized patients scheduled for a PICC or Midline catheter insertion will be randomized (1:1) to either the intervention group (receiving immersive virtual reality distraction throughout the entire procedure) or the control group (receiving standard care). The study model incorporates a collaborative framework with a specialized metabolomics core facility (Hospital del Mar Research Institute) for the bioanalytical analysis of the HPA axis metabolism. Additionally, the experimental design includes pre- and post-procedure physiological tracking (vasoconstriction) and is powered to analyze gender and sex-based differences in response to the IVR exposure.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Advanced Practice Nurse and PhD Candidate in Health Sciences

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 22, 2026

First Posted

July 10, 2026

Study Start (Estimated)

January 15, 2027

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 12, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 12, 2029

Last Updated

July 10, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Data sharing is not planned at this stage as the study is part of an ongoing PhD thesis project. The research team aims to protect the primary data until the main results are analyzed, finalized, and published in peer-reviewed journals to ensure academic priority.

Locations