Assessment of Safety and Feasibility of FUS Next Generation Dome Helmet (NGDH) to Perform Neuromodulation in Patients With Disorders of Consciousness
1 other identifier
interventional
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The main questions this study aims to answer are: Can low-intensity FUS neuromodulation be safely and feasibly administered to the bilateral central thalamus in patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC)? Does FUS neuromodulation result in short-term improvements in arousal or behavioral responsiveness? Does FUS neuromodulation produce measurable changes in neural activity on EEG and/or fMRI? Participants will: Receive two sessions of low-intensity FUS neuromodulation, spaced four weeks apart, plus or minus one week. Undergo pre- and post-treatment assessments, including planning CT, MRI/fMRI, EEG, and standardized clinical scales such as the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). Be continuously monitored for safety during and after each FUS treatment. Complete follow-up imaging and clinical assessments approximately 2 weeks after each FUS session, 12 weeks after the second treatment, and at 12 months post-injury when clinically feasible.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 10, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 2, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 9, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2028
July 9, 2026
July 1, 2026
2 years
July 2, 2026
July 2, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Feasibility of Bilateral Central Thalamic FUS Neuromodulation
Feasibility will be defined as the proportion of enrolled participants who complete both focused ultrasound (FUS) neuromodulation sessions without protocol deviation or occurrence of a serious adverse event (SAE) related to the procedure.
Assessed at Screening/Baseline, Treatment 1, Mid-treatment assessment (2 weeks after Treatment 1), Treatment 2 (4 weeks after Treatment 1), 2-week follow-up (2 weeks after each treatment), 12 weeks after Treatment 2, and 1-year follow-up.
Safety of FUS Next Generation Dome Helmet (NGDH) to Perform Neuromodulation in Patients with Disorders of Consciousness
Safety will be assessed by the frequency, type, and severity of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) following FUS treatment. Events of interest include seizures, autonomic instability, new focal neurological deficits, clinical deterioration, or structural abnormalities detected on post-treatment MRI.
Assessed at Screening/Baseline, Treatment 1, Mid-treatment assessment (2 weeks after Treatment 1), Treatment 2 (4 weeks after Treatment 1), 2-week follow-up (2 weeks after each treatment), 12 weeks after Treatment 2, and 1-year follow-up.
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Change in Behavioral Responsiveness (Coma Recovery Scale-Revised, CRS-R)
Assessed at Baseline, Treatment 1, Mid-treatment assessment (2 weeks after Treatment 1), Treatment 2 (4 weeks after Treatment 1), 2-week follow-up (2 weeks after each treatment), 12 weeks after Treatment 2, and 1-year follow-up.
Change in Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)
Assessed at Baseline, Treatment 1, Mid-treatment assessment (2 weeks after Treatment 1), Treatment 2 (4 weeks after Treatment 1), 2-week follow-up (2 weeks after each treatment), 12 weeks after Treatment 2, and 1-year follow-up.
Change in Rancho Los Amigos Scale Level
Assessed at Baseline, Treatment 1, Mid-treatment assessment (2 weeks after Treatment 1), Treatment 2 (4 weeks after Treatment 1), 2-week follow-up (2 weeks after each treatment), 12 weeks after Treatment 2, and 1-year follow-up.
Change in EEG Measures of Neural Activity
Assessed at Baseline, 2 weeks after each treatment and 1 year follow-up.
Change in Resting-State Functional Connectivity (rs-fMRI)
Assessed at Baseline, 2 weeks after each treatment and 1 year follow-up.
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Focused Ultrasound Neuromodulation
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive two sessions of MRI-guided low-intensity focused ultrasound (FUS) neuromodulation using the FUS Next Generation Dome Helmet (NGDH), targeting the bilateral centromedian and parafascicular nuclei of the thalamus. Treatments will be spaced four weeks apart, plus or minus one week. All participants will receive the same intervention and will be followed for safety, feasibility, clinical outcomes, and neurophysiological effects, including follow-up through 12 weeks after the second treatment and additional assessments at 12 months post-injury when feasible.
Interventions
Participants will receive MR-guided focused ultrasound neuromodulation using the Next Generation Dome Helmet (NGDH). Each participant will undergo two treatment sessions spaced four weeks apart. MRI and CT imaging will be used to guide targeting of the bilateral centromedian/parafascicular nuclei of the thalamus. Continuous monitoring will be performed during each session, and follow-up clinical, EEG, and MRI assessments will be conducted to evaluate safety, feasibility, and preliminary effects.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of severe traumatic brain injury, hypoxic-ischemic brain injury, or other acute brain injury.
- Glasgow coma scale below 13 when off sedation, or on minimal sedation.
- Absence of another better explanation for the depressed level of consciousness (e.g,, metabolic abnormality, seizures)
- Intracranial pressure (ICP) is within a normal range (\< 20 cm H2O), or, a neurosurgeon associated with the study and/or the treating physician agree that ICP is likely \< 20 cm H2O based on clinical and neuroimaging information (acknowledging the limitations of non-invasive assessment of ICP53).
- The treating physician and/or neurosurgeon associated with the study evaluate it to be safe for the patient to be transported to the MRI scanner for a \~45 minute scan.
You may not qualify if:
- Active seizure activity or post-anoxic myoclonus at the time of proposed treatment
- Taking full anti-coagulation medication (does not include deep-vein-thrombosis chemoprophylaxis)
- Skull anatomy incompatible with safe FUS delivery (as determined by CT)
- Medical instability that would preclude safe transport or prolonged supine positioning
- Presence of any MRI-incompatible implants or devices
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 2, 2026
First Posted
July 9, 2026
Study Start
September 10, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2028
Last Updated
July 9, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share