High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Nasal CPAP as Primary Support in Preterm Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Heated Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure as Primary Respiratory Support in Preterm Infants With Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
86
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This single-center randomized controlled trial compared heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) as primary noninvasive respiratory support in preterm infants (gestational age 28-34 weeks; birth weight 1000-2000 g) with moderate respiratory distress syndrome. The primary outcome was treatment failure requiring invasive mechanical ventilation within the first 7 days.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 16, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 9, 2026
CompletedJuly 9, 2026
June 1, 2026
1.9 years
June 16, 2026
July 3, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Treatment Failure Requiring Invasive Mechanical Ventilation
Treatment failure defined as the need for invasive mechanical ventilation per pre-specified criteria (FiO2 \>=0.60 to maintain SpO2 91-95%; pH \<7.20 with PaCO2 \>60 mmHg; recurrent or caffeine-refractory apnea; markedly increased work of breathing; or clinical deterioration determined by the attending neonatologist), assessed at 72 hours, Day 5, and Day 7 of life.
First 7 days of life (assessed at 72 hours, Day 5, and Day 7)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Number of Participants With Nasal Trauma
During noninvasive respiratory support (first 7 days of life)
Number of Participants With Proven (Culture-Positive) Late-Onset Sepsis
From 72 hours of life through hospital discharge, an average of 24 days
Number of Participants With Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD)
At 36 weeks postmenstrual age
Other Outcomes (14)
Number of Participants With Patent Ductus Arteriosus (PDA) Requiring Treatment
From randomization through hospital discharge, an average of 24 days
Number of Participants With Intraventricular Hemorrhage (IVH) of Any Grade
From randomization through hospital discharge, an average of 24 days
Number of Participants With Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) of Any Stage
From randomization through hospital discharge, an average of 24 days
- +11 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Group 1 Heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC)
EXPERIMENTALn:43 Vapotherm Precision Flow Hi-VNI; initial flow 5 L/min (range 5-8 L/min), 37°C, 100% humidity; FiO₂ titrated to SpO₂ 91-95%.
Group 2 Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP)
ACTIVE COMPARATORn:43 nCPAP via ventilator-driven system; pressure 5-8 cmH2O; FiO2 titrated to SpO2 91-95%.
Interventions
HHHFNC delivered via the Vapotherm Precision Flow Hi-VNI system; initial flow 5 L/min (range 5-8 L/min), 37°C, 100% humidity; FiO2 titrated to maintain SpO2 91-95%.
nCPAP delivered via a ventilator-driven system; pressure 5-8 cmH2O; FiO2 titrated to maintain SpO2 91-95%.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Preterm infants admitted to the NICU who fulfilled all of the following were eligible:
- Gestational age (GA) 28+0 to 34+6 weeks and/or birth weight 1,000-2,000 g
- Clinical and radiological diagnosis of moderate respiratory distress syndrome (RDS)
- Silverman-Anderson score (SAS) 4 \< SAS \< 7
- Eligibility for noninvasive ventilatory support
You may not qualify if:
- Parental refusal of consent
- Outborn infants transferred from other centers
- Infants who required immediate intubation in the delivery room
- Major congenital anomalies, chromosomal disorders, gastrointestinal malformations, or life-threatening congenital cardiac defects
- Nasal/pharyngeal anatomical anomalies (choanal atresia, cleft palate/lip)
- Moderate-to-severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (Grade 2-3)
- Infants who died unexpectedly shortly after admission without respiratory evaluation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kayseri City Hospital
Kayseri, Kayseri, 38090, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (10)
Sweet DG, Carnielli VP, Greisen G, Hallman M, Klebermass-Schrehof K, Ozek E, Te Pas A, Plavka R, Roehr CC, Saugstad OD, Simeoni U, Speer CP, Vento M, Visser GHA, Halliday HL. European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome: 2022 Update. Neonatology. 2023;120(1):3-23. doi: 10.1159/000528914. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
PMID: 36863329RESULTHodgson KA, Wilkinson D, De Paoli AG, Manley BJ. Nasal high flow therapy for primary respiratory support in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 5;5(5):CD006405. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006405.pub4.
PMID: 37144837RESULTBruet S, Butin M, Dutheil F. Systematic review of high-flow nasal cannula versus continuous positive airway pressure for primary support in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2022 Jan;107(1):56-59. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-321094. Epub 2021 May 20.
PMID: 34016651RESULTLuo K, Huang Y, Xiong T, Tang J. High-flow nasal cannula versus continuous positive airway pressure in primary respiratory support for preterm infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pediatr. 2022 Nov 21;10:980024. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.980024. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 36479290RESULTAramesh MR, et al. nCPAP vs HFNC for RDS in preterm neonates: a RCT. Curr Respir Med Rev. 2025;21(3). doi:10.2174/011573398X339994241209170750
RESULTSingh S, Ananthan A, Nanavati R. Post-INSURE Administration of Heated Humidified High-Flow Therapy Versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Preterm Infants More Than 28 Weeks Gestation with Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial. J Trop Pediatr. 2022 Jun 6;68(4):fmac062. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmac062.
PMID: 35877150RESULTDemirel G, Vatansever B, Tastekin A. High Flow Nasal Cannula versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Primary Respiratory Support in Preterm Infants: A Prospective Randomized Study. Am J Perinatol. 2021 Feb;38(3):237-241. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1696673. Epub 2019 Sep 28.
PMID: 31563133RESULTMurki S, Singh J, Khant C, Kumar Dash S, Oleti TP, Joy P, Kabra NS. High-Flow Nasal Cannula versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Primary Respiratory Support in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Neonatology. 2018;113(3):235-241. doi: 10.1159/000484400. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
PMID: 29393237RESULTLavizzari A, Colnaghi M, Ciuffini F, Veneroni C, Musumeci S, Cortinovis I, Mosca F. Heated, Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Respiratory Distress Syndrome of Prematurity: A Randomized Clinical Noninferiority Trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Aug 8. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.1243. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 27532363RESULTRoberts CT, Owen LS, Manley BJ, Froisland DH, Donath SM, Dalziel KM, Pritchard MA, Cartwright DW, Collins CL, Malhotra A, Davis PG; HIPSTER Trial Investigators. Nasal High-Flow Therapy for Primary Respiratory Support in Preterm Infants. N Engl J Med. 2016 Sep 22;375(12):1142-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1603694.
PMID: 27653564RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 16, 2026
First Posted
July 9, 2026
Study Start
June 1, 2020
Primary Completion
May 1, 2022
Study Completion
May 1, 2022
Last Updated
July 9, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The data that support the findings of this study are not publicly available due to privacy and ethical restrictions but are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.